• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Great Chronological Run-Through

As KRAD pointed out in his recent Tor.com review, there's a hell of a lot about "The Menagerie" that makes no sense at all.

I'll have to read over that (and the comments); I've been through a lot of KRAD's reviews in the past and would definitely recommend them. I haven't looked at this one yet - now would seem a good time, wouldn't it? :)

Spock committed any number of career-ending crimes even beyond violating General Order 7, yet faced no consequences.

Perhaps we might assume (and I say this without any real commitment to it, just throwing it into the pot) that even if Spock himself protested otherwise, he was given the benefit of the doubt due to the proven powers of the Talosians? That is, unwilling to lose one of their most outstanding officers, Starfleet (or some of those well-placed within it) pushed for the official stance to be one of Talosians Made Him Do It?

Of course, we've already established in "Court Martial" how problematic these "space law" episodes can be on the actual handling of the law and legal procedures. :D

the reasons for the death penalty were vague.

True (and we all know that the real reason is DRAMA), though there are at least some fascinating implications for what the Federation considers the most extreme threat to its civilization's current form, and thus requiring the strongest deterrent.

...the idea that Pike would've been unable to communicate beyond yes/no beeps makes no sense. Even if they didn't have the technologies we have today to allow paralyzed or "locked-in" people to communicate, couldn't Pike have used Morse code or something? Couldn't someone have just asked him a more useful series of yes/no questions to close in on just what he was saying yes or no about? Or, heck, couldn't they have used one of those brain-wave-reading universal translators we'll see next season in "Metamorphosis?" (See the link for more discussion.)

Admittedly, this is very hard to justify.
 
Last edited:
Either by nature or by convention and design, the young super-being seems to lack access to the full range of powers available to its elders, being dependent on technology (or at least, on more unsophisticated and obvious technology; there's no reason to assume the parents aren't reliant on it too).

Right. I've never understood why people are so quick to ascribe Organian/Q-level powers to Trelane when he's so clearly dependent on technology. Sure, his species is apparently incorporeal, but we've seen incorporeals dependent on tech before, such as the Wisps from ENT: "The Crossing," and we'll see others in the future, such as the energy creature from "Beyond the Farthest Star," which was helpless without a starship to possess.

Not to mention that most of what Trelane did could be done with a transporter and a holodeck. The only exceptions are "programming" Uhura to play the harpsichord and moving Gothos, the latter of which could've been an illusion. His parents did imply he'd made the planet, but maybe the whole thing was a holographic construct.

Trelane, after all, has as little depth as his hollow manor and its adornments; unlike Q, who is at times truly philosophically provocative, Trelane just makes shallow, off-the-cuff observations dressed up as pointed commentary. If he hadn't come first, he'd be a parody.
I'd say that "Squire" wasn't a vehicle for commentary so much as an excuse for raiding Desilu's prop and costume warehouses.

That's an interesting point. I think what little we hear of Trelane's parents off screen adds weight to the theory of Trelane's power level, since they seem more godlike.
Also, Q Squared firmly establishes that Trelane is a young Q.
 
That's an interesting point. I think what little we hear of Trelane's parents off screen adds weight to the theory of Trelane's power level, since they seem more godlike.

I don't see any evidence of that. The only things they actually do are to send Trelane "to his room" and to maintain Class-M conditions on Gothos until Kirk leaves. They actually do less than Trelane does, so there's not a shred of evidence that their powers are any greater than his; only their authority is greater, because they're his parents. And because they do so little, there's no reason to assume they aren't just as dependent on technology for their powers.

It's just that fans tend to project their assumptions about other incorporeal species like the Organians onto this episode. They read things into it that aren't there.


Also, Q Squared firmly establishes that Trelane is a young Q.

And I've stated on many occasions why I don't agree with that interpretation. That's my whole point -- that Trelane's powers are clearly established in the episode as technological, not "godlike," and the only reason he gets compared to Q is because their personalities are similar.

The book's claims are certainly incompatible with what Voyager later established, namely that the Q had never procreated before "The Q and the Gray," and that Q Junior almost instantly had the same level of power as his parents, without needing any kind of technological crutch. Don't get me wrong, I think Q Squared is probably Peter David's best book, but it's been superseded by canon, as so many other books have.
 
I just assume the tech Trelane is using is training wheels. He has Q power, but lacks control because of his age.
I really don't have an answer to reconcile Q Squared with The Q and the Gray, but I still consider Q Squared as part of my canon, even if no one else has to.
 
"Arena"

In a different extrapolation from the canonical Trek universe than the one I'm exploring here, here's Captain Veice (V'iii-sss) of the IKS Killinger. He is here to remind us that Gorn are awesome, even when they must suffer my bungling attempts at control.

pbeZIdS.png


It's been a while since we've encountered another full-fledged interstellar civilization new to our protagonists (the First Federation being the last, if I recall correctly). This episode takes a rather neutral approach to the existence of other empires in unexplored space, depicting the Gorn as territorial and dangerous but more of a hazard faced by the unprepared or a grim reality of the frontier than anything to be judged. The Federation is in many ways rather hard-hearted and ready to accept its losses, and it's certainly intriguing to muse upon. Spock, I think, would approve, given the measured and reasonable if somewhat coldly unfeeling approach that the Federation seems to take in the aftermath of the attack (and we know from later history that no hostile stance was taken regarding the Gorn). The Federation seems to take the annihilation of its people in situations like this as an uneasy consequence of going boldly, and a cautious example of the need to tread carefully when there are other, unknown players also out exploring and colonizing space. People often mention the "mercy" angle in Kirk refusing to kill S'alath (as the Gorn captain is named in the novels), but I think the more intriguing aspect is the non-judgemental nature with which the humans ultimately relate to the Gorn, not as equals bound in a mutual understanding nor as demonised opponents, but rather hands-off and accepting. Sometimes lizard-men are going to freak out over accidental incursions into their territory and rain down fire on you. Deal with it. There's a lot to think and feel regarding this, some of it making the Federation seem very admirable to my eyes, some of it potentially troubling in various ways. What isn't?

I suppose we should also note the possible irony in the reptiles' approach being potentially read as the hot-headed one (instant, uncommunicative attack on trespassers and perceived invaders) and the mammals - the Enterprise crew - immediately latching on to the Gorn's defensive justification as reason to cool things down and prioritise a more sedately measured approach. That said, I don't personally perceive Gorn aggression as "hot-headed" but rather just brute-force and methodical. I don't believe that they act in the passion of the moment, but simply bring defensive instincts to the fore, and these loom so large in their minds that logically all other concerns are swept aside or cannot muster the influence to steer them from their committed path.

Continuity

The Gorn were first mentioned back in the Enterprise episode "Bound", as trade partners of certain Orion interests, noted for brewing very desirable meridor. Other sources expand on this to describe the Gorn production method as making use of enzymes originating in the intestinal tracts of labourer-caste Gorn; whether the enzymes are collected through medical procedures or (as I suspect is more likely given the Gorn's general brute force approach to things) they just throw up in it, I'm unsure. Either way, meridor is better when it's had what amounts to passage through a Gorn, in the manner, one assumes, of coffee beans passing through the digestive system of Civets.

This initial mention and our Mirror Universe visit aside, this is the first appearance of the Gorn Hegemony as a player in interstellar politics, though it will remain a low-key and often overlooked piece of the tapestry, in part because of its distance from the Federation core, combined with the Gorns' comparative lack of interest in outside affairs. From this episode we get our basic sense of the Gorn people: methodical; territorial; wary; brutal when they feel imposed upon. A certain tunnel vision and relentless pursuit of an objective is apparently inherent to them; I wonder what the fauna of Gornar or their other core worlds is like; would they hunt lumbering prey with the methodical, slow-but-steady pace with which S'alath pursues Kirk, bringing it down like charcharodontosaurs targeting sauropods? Of course, Gorn evolution is difficult to pin down because they're such an ancient species. We'll learn over time that the Gorn caste system is now a matter of biology as much as anything, with millennia of selective breeding having rendered the Gorn a very diverse and stratified people. They've also been shaped by the environments of multiple worlds, to the point that certain of their castes (including the warrior breed we meet here) are no longer able to incubate successfully on Gornar itself. They're an insular people, comfortable in their rut, and it will be a while before they're drawn out - indeed, they seem to find the Cestus debacle more alarming than the Federation does, since they'll retreat in the aftermath and pursue what characters on both sides will later describe as a century of isolation. They'll even renounce the very claim to Cestus and neighbouring systems that triggered their hostility here, something that doesn't seem to rest too easily in the Gorn cultural mindset (evidence will mount that Gorn are very possessive and don't relinquish a holding easily once they feel it's theirs). Combined with what we'll soon learn about Gorn attitudes toward aliens on their outworlds, it would seem that the Gorn have little interest in the outside galaxy unless they feel threatened by it -- though as the Orions showed us, they're trading.

I suppose I should also discuss the Metrons, since they feature just as heavily. The Metrons won't be heard from again until it's revealed that Nanietta Bacco, Governor of Cestus, successfully negotiated an agreement with them around the same time that she patched up Cestus-Hegemony relations in the aftermath of the Black Crest campaign (we'll get there in due time; years, at the rate this is going ;)). Presumably trying to ensure that all players in the region were committed, this is regarded as an impressive display of political and diplomatic prowess, and such is pretty important - in that Bacco making a name for herself outside of Cestus is what makes her an accepted candidate for the presidency.

There is a mention of "Metron Consortium" in Deep Space Nine, but I interpret that as coincidental name-sharing (it has to happen quite often in a galaxy of a million languages and cultures); that, or it's a deliberately ironic name, akin perhaps to "Mahatma Ghandi Munitions". I hope the official emblem features a grizzled, hard-eyed Metron armed to the teeth. Also possible behind the irony: someone knows enough about Metron operation to at least suspect a certain hypocrisy about them.

Anyway, the Metrons are yet more mysterious energy people with mysterious powers and a parental air about them, though their true nature is unclear. Possibly they're a people even further along the developmental path that the Gorn seem to have chosen - resting comfortably in their enclave adhering to millennia-old traditions, generally reacting rather than projecting, cultivating a sense of easy superiority? Their motive is difficult to decipher - are they trying to be genuinely helpful, streamlining the conflict for minimum bloodshed by reducing it to individual champions, while encouraging Personal Growth by telling the captains that there are elements suitable for fabricating weapons - that is, if you're going to fight with weapons, you could use your ingenuity to create them! Won't that be fun! - sort of a quietly desperate or adoringly parental effort to make the play slightly "educational"? Are they just messing lesser species around from a position of assumed moral superiority as manifests in smug indifference to others' desires? Kirk even accuses them of setting the contest up for entertainment (a reasonable assumption, but I wonder if he was recalling the Talosians, whose home videos he recently watched).

The Metrons claim that violent intent is at odds with civilization, though they view "mercy" as a civilized trait, which suggests that they at least must retain some understanding of intensive interpersonal aggression. They certainly have a rather easy time segregating outsiders from the perceived protections of "civilization" - you're violent, so you don't count. Very convenient, Metrons, and if you so easily place other people outside of the system codes and niceties that define your concept of society then I can see why you place such importance on "mercy" but not how you're apparently "non-savage" as you seem to define it. Of course, I have no idea if the Metrons mean what they say. It's hard to know what to take at face value here. But if we accept what they say then they certainly don't seem that different to Humans or Gorn.

More insight into what took place in this episode (the Cestus attack and the Federation's incursion into the region, that is, not the Metrons) will be offered very soon in Open Secrets, which will contextualise Cestus by revealing it to be part of the general Taurus Reach colonization initiative (although Cestus in fact lies slightly outside of the official boundaries of the Reach, however precisely those are measured - I'm guessing there's a reasonable degree of vagueness about it). Cestus will be resettled sometime before the 2290s, and somewhere down the line will receive full membership in the Federation.

Characters insist that diamond is the hardest substance known. We'll have a lot of fun with this as the episodes mount, because they keep changing their minds. As it is, tritanium will be noted as harder than diamond and the Axanar were using that a century ago.

Next Time: "The Alternative Factor".
 
Last edited:
People often mention the "mercy" angle in Kirk refusing to kill S'alath (as the Gorn captain is named in the novels)

To give credit where it's due, this name was coined in Marvel's Star Trek Unlimited #1 by Dan Abnett and Ian Edgington in 1996.


They'll even renounce the very claim to Cestus and neighbouring systems that triggered their hostility here, something that doesn't seem to rest too easily in the Gorn cultural mindset (evidence will mount that Gorn are very possessive and don't relinquish a holding easily once they feel it's theirs).

That always bugged me, the way DS9 established Cestus III as a Federation colony, when the whole takeaway from "Arena" was that the Federation didn't have the right to be there. It struck me as missing the point.


Anyway, the Metrons are yet more mysterious energy people with mysterious powers and a parental air about them, though their true nature is unclear.

The Metrons are not "energy people." There is nothing whatsoever in the episode to suggest that the boyish Metron we see at the end is not in his true form. The only reason some people have gotten the false impression that they're energy beings is because Carole Shelyne's shiny costume reflected glints of light into the camera lens, creating a sparkly effect around the Metron. Combined with the preponderance of first-season super-races that were energy beings, some people just assumed the Metrons were also. All that's actually said in the episode, though, is that the Metron looks boyish but is 1500 years old. That suggests they're extremely long-lived humanoids, not incorporeals.


Their motive is difficult to decipher - are they trying to be genuinely helpful, streamlining the conflict for minimum bloodshed by reducing it to individual champions, while encouraging Personal Growth by telling the captains that there are elements suitable for fabricating weapons - that is, if you're going to fight with weapons, you could use your ingenuity to create them! Won't that be fun! - sort of a quietly desperate or adoringly parental effort to make the play slightly "educational"? Are they just messing lesser species around from a position of assumed moral superiority as manifests in smug indifference to others' desires?

There were lines cut from the final scene -- but retained in the Blish adaptation -- revealing the Metrons' true motivation:

http://www.orionpressfanzines.com/articles/arena.htm
We said that the ship of the loser
of this personal combat would be
destroyed. That is not quite
accurate. It is the winner... the
stronger, the more resourceful...
who would pose the greatest threat
to us. We planned to destroy the
vessel of the winner.

So the real purpose was a test to see which race was the greater threat to the Metrons themselves -- further establishing that they can't be godlike energy beings, if they can be threatened by corporeal civilizations. If you prick them, they probably bleed.


Characters insist that diamond is the hardest substance known. We'll have a lot of fun with this as the episodes mount, because they keep changing their minds. As it is, tritanium will be noted as harder than diamond and the Axanar were using that a century ago.

Maybe they mean diamond is the hardest naturally occurring substance, assuming tritanium is an alloy (as the name would suggest -- perhaps some blend of titanium and two other metals?). Of course, even that is inaccurate; there are at least two extremely rare natural substances that are harder than diamond, not to mention at least one artificial nanomaterial.
 
That always bugged me, the way DS9 established Cestus III as a Federation colony, when the whole takeaway from "Arena" was that the Federation didn't have the right to be there. It struck me as missing the point.

Interesting. I wasn't bothered by this as a lot can happen in a hundred years. Exchange of worlds? Peace agreement? Abandonment of borders?

LJ.
 
^Sure, but none of that was mentioned. It was just presented without justification that Cestus III belonged to the UFP now, without acknowledging the Gorn in any way.
 
Why should it?

SISKO: That sounds like baseball.
KASIDY: You know about baseball?
SISKO: It's my favourite sport. But no one has played it for two hundred years.
KASIDY: Well, they're playing it on Cestus III, which, as you know Ben, was ceded to the Federation after the border was negotiated in 2312 after a new, less territorial Gorn government came to power. In returns the Federation made several trade concessions and agreed to abandon our border listening posts. At least they have been playing it for the past six months.
SISKO: I had no idea. That's fantastic. How many teams are there?
 
Why should it?

SISKO: That sounds like baseball.
KASIDY: You know about baseball?
SISKO: It's my favourite sport. But no one has played it for two hundred years.
KASIDY: Well, they're playing it on Cestus III, which, as you know Ben, was ceded to the Federation after the border was negotiated in 2312 after a new, less territorial Gorn government came to power. In returns the Federation made several trade concessions and agreed to abandon our border listening posts. At least they have been playing it for the past six months.
SISKO: I had no idea. That's fantastic. How many teams are there?

I believe I see Captain Exposition's work here!:lol:
 
Why should it?

SISKO: That sounds like baseball.
KASIDY: You know about baseball?
SISKO: It's my favourite sport. But no one has played it for two hundred years.
KASIDY: Well, they're playing it on Cestus III, which, as you know Ben, was ceded to the Federation after the border was negotiated in 2312 after a new, less territorial Gorn government came to power. In returns the Federation made several trade concessions and agreed to abandon our border listening posts. At least they have been playing it for the past six months.
SISKO: I had no idea. That's fantastic. How many teams are there?

That was awesome. :guffaw:
 
Well, indeed. :lol:

But I suppose the point is: why Cestus III? They picked a point of origin for Kasidy Yates, and it could have been any world. Apparently they wanted a nod to TOS - always welcome, of course - and so picked an established colony, but they made an odd choice by picking a planet that in its initial appearance wasn't actually Federation, certainly not after the Gorn levelled it, and where it was a plot point that Humans setting up home there was a problem. It does seem odd that they'd pick Cestus III, and arguably even more so when they then make no mention of the Gorn (as clunky and pointless as that would indeed have been from a script-writing perspective). That said, it does raise interesting questions, which I suppose is also welcome in terms of providing hooks for world-building expansion. It does at least tell us that something has changed in the century since.
 
But I suppose the point is: why Cestus III? They picked a point of origin for Kasidy Yates, and it could have been any world. Apparently they wanted a nod to TOS - always welcome, of course - and so picked an established colony, but they made an odd choice by picking a planet that in its initial appearance wasn't actually Federation, certainly not after the Gorn levelled it, and where it was a plot point that Humans setting up home there was a problem. It does seem odd that they'd pick Cestus III, and arguably even more so when they then make no mention of the Gorn (as clunky and pointless as that would indeed have been from a script-writing perspective).

Right. It'd be kind of like writing a near-future story that casually claimed that Vietnam was under French rule. It's a thoughtless, throwaway mention of something that's either historically ignorant or disturbingly revanchist in its implications. If they wanted to casually mention a Federation colony connecting to TOS, Cestus III was a bad choice, because the whole point of the story was that the Federation did not have a manifest destiny to turn any planet they wanted into a human possession. Certainly it's not impossible that matters could change enough that the Gorn would cede Cestus III, but that's too massive a change to just establish in passing without explanation. It would've had to be a focus of the story rather than just a passing nod. If that was all they wanted, then Kasidy's home should've been someplace more neutral, like Benecia or Ariannus.
 
Right. It'd be kind of like writing a near-future story that casually claimed that Vietnam was under French rule. It's a thoughtless, throwaway mention of something that's either historically ignorant or disturbingly revanchist in its implications.
Sorry, Christopher, but this is just a bizarre statement to me. Throwaway comments to build a future history are a key feature of science fiction, especially Star Trek, which posited a war perpetrated by selectively bred supermen only 30 years in the future! Or that 50 years in the future, there'd be 52 states, or that 35 years in the future, Northern Ireland would be reclaimed from Great Britain-- all events that are a good deal less probable than this one, based on our knowledge.

A hundred years have passed since "Arena," and we literally know nothing canonically about the status of the Gorn after 2267. For all we know by 2370, they're Federation members and all the other baseball players on Kasidy's brother's team are Gorn.
 
^I'm not saying it can't be rationalized in-universe. Anything can be rationalized in-universe with a little creativity, so it's trivial to point that out. I'm talking about the mindset of the writers who put it in there, their apparent failure to give any thought to the questions it would raise. That's something that bothered me the moment I first heard Kasidy mention Cestus III back in 1995. It took me out of the story because it just sounded so wrong for Cestus III to be a Federation colony. Lines that take you out of the story are not good.
 
Right. It'd be kind of like writing a near-future story that casually claimed that Vietnam was under French rule. It's a thoughtless, throwaway mention of something that's either historically ignorant or disturbingly revanchist in its implications.
Sorry, Christopher, but this is just a bizarre statement to me. Throwaway comments to build a future history are a key feature of science fiction, especially Star Trek, which posited a war perpetrated by selectively bred supermen only 30 years in the future! Or that 50 years in the future, there'd be 52 states, or that 35 years in the future, Northern Ireland would be reclaimed from Great Britain-- all events that are a good deal less probable than this one, based on our knowledge.

It's not about how likely or unlikely it is, though; it's about the implication. All the statements you describe are relatively inoffensive (except potentially for the Irish unification, but it's at least to a degree anti-colonial and pro-self-determination). But what Christopher is saying is that the reference misses the point of "Arena" entirely; it's as though the writers of DS9 were implying that the Federation was in the end right in "Arena" all along. He's not saying that it's bad because it's an unlikely event, he's saying it's bad because on its face it's a pro-imperialist inclusion in Federation history. One that can be rationalized against those ends, yeah, but that still presents an implication towards imperialism/colonialism if you make no rationalizations whatsoever and merely let it sit on its own with no context about how it happened, as the episode did.
 
He's not saying that it's bad because it's an unlikely event, he's saying it's bad because on its face it's a pro-imperialist inclusion in Federation history. One that can be rationalized against those ends, yeah, but that still presents an implication towards imperialism/colonialism if you make no rationalizations whatsoever and merely let it sit on its own with no context about how it happened, as the episode did.

Yes. It's the same as, say, doing a story that paints the Gorn as vicious, predatory monsters and imperialists. That's also missing the point of "Arena," because it's mistaking Kirk's first impression of the Gorn for the reality, and the whole point of the story was that Kirk was wrong about them, that they were the wronged party. (That was one thing that bugged me about The Gorn Crisis at first, but at least it portrayed the savage imperialist Gorn as a fringe faction that overthrew the rightful government.) That message, that lesson in humility for the human race, was what made "Arena" one of the show's most powerful episodes. So it shouldn't be forgotten or casually tossed aside for the sake of a random Easter egg.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top