They had a suit and it featured prominently but there was absolutely a CG Gorn used as well, for at least several (most?) wide shots.As far as I can tell, only the tail was cgi.
They had a suit and it featured prominently but there was absolutely a CG Gorn used as well, for at least several (most?) wide shots.As far as I can tell, only the tail was cgi.
They won't just leave them as mindless monsters, the writers and producers know how Trek works.
Give them time, they'll say this now because that's what they want the Gorn to be seen as now. But those humanising/relatable aspects will come in, they do every single time.From Variety:
AKIVA GOLDSMAN: I thought it was important for there to be real monsters in our galaxy ... By the way, many of the other “Star Trek” antagonists began as alien, as Other — forgive the use of “alien” — but we learned to connect with them. Not so the Gorn. The Gorn are not understandable to us in this way, not relatable to us in this way. Part of our galaxy is be good, be kind, be empathetic, and also understand that evil exists, because seeing with compassion does mean you should be blind to horror. The Gorn are monsters.
From Inverse:
GOLDSMAN: “I mean, this goes all the way back to the Gorn skeleton in Lorca’s lab on Discovery. Much less the Gorn neon velvet painting in the Artifact in Picard Season 1, which was painted out [in post-production.] So yes, I’ve always wanted to sell a version of the Gorn. But, our Gorn are real monsters. Compassion and empathy, are the driving themes and intent for our show. But, we also wanted to say that those things don't preclude the existence of monsters. So, that’s the role the Gorn have currently on our show. I'm a believer in kindness, connection, and understanding. I also believe there are monsters out there. And it's our job to show both.”
This version of the Gorn is about as well thought out with depth and nuance as the Discovery version of the Klingons were.
Give them time, they'll say this now because that's what they want the Gorn to be seen as now. But those humanising/relatable aspects will come in, they do every single time.
Nope.From Variety:
AKIVA GOLDSMAN: I thought it was important for there to be real monsters in our galaxy ... By the way, many of the other “Star Trek” antagonists began as alien, as Other — forgive the use of “alien” — but we learned to connect with them. Not so the Gorn. The Gorn are not understandable to us in this way, not relatable to us in this way. Part of our galaxy is be good, be kind, be empathetic, and also understand that evil exists, because seeing with compassion does mean you should be blind to horror. The Gorn are monsters.
From Inverse:
GOLDSMAN: “I mean, this goes all the way back to the Gorn skeleton in Lorca’s lab on Discovery. Much less the Gorn neon velvet painting in the Artifact in Picard Season 1, which was painted out [in post-production.] So yes, I’ve always wanted to sell a version of the Gorn. But, our Gorn are real monsters. Compassion and empathy, are the driving themes and intent for our show. But, we also wanted to say that those things don't preclude the existence of monsters. So, that’s the role the Gorn have currently on our show. I'm a believer in kindness, connection, and understanding. I also believe there are monsters out there. And it's our job to show both.”
This version of the Gorn is about as well thought out with depth and nuance as the Discovery version of the Klingons were.
Nope.
Goldsman is right about all that.
Maybe an enemy who is legitimately bad, and beyond easy redemption, is a worthwhile tack for Trek to take. The closest thing we've seen so far are the Borg (as a collective) and the Jem'Hadar.
does anyone really get the impression that Kurtzman/Goldsman could actually develop a complex villain, or something as innovative and still frightening (by ST standards) as the Borg?
For me as well, since it establishes that their violent nature and contempt for other races is genetically locked in. "To the Death" and "By Inferno's Light" do give them a sense of honor... but they're still remorseless killing machines.The episode where Odo tries to rehabilitate a young Jem'Hadar is
I think you have to take a look at what the creators have delivered so far. Curent Trek series are too fast paced and FX driven for the creators to be overly concerned with building tension the way the earlier (but also cheaper) Trek series had to. The Gorn are exactly what you would expect from a studio philosophy based more on thrills than creativity.Sure, why not?
I see no reason not too. Though Kurtzman’s involvement with the show is minimal. In addition to Goldsman, the guy running things is Henry Alonso Meyers. Though I guess Kurtzman is quite the Boogey Man.Whether or not you like the Gorn as portrayed in SNW, does anyone really get the impression that Kurtzman/Goldsman could actually develop a complex villain, or something as innovative and still frightening (by ST standards) as the Borg?
And discovering this is what makes them interesting adversaries. They are monsters, but complex ones, which is why I think the "xenogorns" are just not that interesting.For me as well, since it establishes that their violent nature and contempt for other races is genetically locked in. "To the Death" and "By Inferno's Light" do give them a sense of honor... but they're still remorseless killing machines.
I see no reason not too. Though Kurtzman’s involvement with the show is minimal. In addition to Goldsman, the guy running things is Henry Alonso Meyers. Though I guess Kurtzman is quite the Boogey Man.
Never found the Borg particularly innovative and they were frightening for maybe an episode or two. Relentless techno-zombie? Doctor Who says “Hi.”
They were Zombies from day one.Unfortunately, the Borg became zombies when the creators realized they had something interesting on their hands and overexposed them.
"I, Borg" really set the standard for how the Borg should have been utilized. post BoBW. Even Worf is scared shitless of them. The Borg should have remained an overwhelming enemy to be avoided or outwitted, but rarely confronted. Their uncompromising alien-ness was their hook.
As for the Gorn? I say dispose of them as villains and come up with something more creative.
which is why I think the "xenogorns" are just not that interesting.
Something must happen to classify all aspects of the Gorn, before Arena.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.