Ryan Gosling is a more celebrated sex symbol than Margo Robbie.
Meanwhile Marvel's Shang Chi is also Ken.
And the next Doctor Who is also Ken
Ryan Gosling is a more celebrated sex symbol than Margo Robbie.
Meanwhile Marvel's Shang Chi is also Ken.
Ryan Gosling is a more celebrated sex symbol than Margo Robbie.
Meanwhile Marvel's Shang Chi is also Ken.
And the next Doctor Who is also Ken
And also...is is just me, or does it look like he is running BACKWARDS in at least a couple of the scenes?Rewatching this at home - I'm struck at how bad some of the CGI is - even leaving the director's excuses - there are multiple scenes where Ezra Millar's face is badly CGI'd onto his double's face...
That was clearly intentional. He runs so fast that he starts going back in time which is why it looks like he is running backwards.And also...is is just me, or does it look like he is running BACKWARDS in at least a couple of the scenes?
So even more confusing than Reeve Superman flying backwards? (I understood he was flying back in time, but some saw it as Superman spinning the glibe in reverse)It's like people are looking for any excuse to berate the film.
That was clearly intentional. He runs so fast that he starts going back in time which is why it looks like he is running backwards.
So even more confusing than Reeve Superman flying backwards? (I understood he was flying back in time, but some saw it as Superman spinning the glibe in reverse)
I always thought he flew back in time but em... reviewing it he then goes forward a couple of times to get the earth started again in the right direction... ![]()
So even more confusing than Reeve Superman flying backwards? (I understood he was flying back in time, but some saw it as Superman spinning the glibe in reverse)
WB put up one of the Flash extras on YouTube. I know why, but it's still kind of funny to see them interview Ezra's double rather than Ezra.![]()
Considering how poorly the film did I think it's safe to say that nobody in that movie will ever be back again. No Sasha Calle Supergirl
The highlight of this film was Supergirl.
No inherent reason for this, though I certainly won’t be surprised if it’s true. She wasn’t in the film long enough to be the star of the film (so its business failure isn’t her fault), her sequences did nothing to diminish her as she is one of the film’s best aspects, and, frankly, if the marketing people simply ignore the Flash movie, by the time the Supergirl movie comes out, it’ll be largely forgotten by the general audience. And given other actors will be reprising DCEU roles in the new DCU, AND she’s not weighed down with significant DCEU baggage, I see no rational reason for her not to be in the Supergirl movie, unless she chooses to decline the role.No Sasha Calle Supergirl
I see no rational reason for her not to be in the Supergirl movie, unless she chooses to decline the role.
I enjoyed it, warts and all.Considering how poorly the film did I think it's safe to say that nobody in that movie will ever be back again. No Sasha Calle Supergirl, no Keaton team up with Batfleck. Audiences and fans buried it and anything related to it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.