So let me see if i understand this.
Old guns, Gilbert and Sullivan, 3D movies, lounge singers, popcorn, chewing gum, Sherlock Holmes, the wild west, the alamo, the battle of Britain, James bond, and a whole episode of baseball = Star Trek
Motorbike and rock music = not Star Trek.
The trope of characters being into 20th and 21st century things is present on every incarnation of Star Trek so far. Why is it so out of place here?
Most of what you list are things that are either daydreams, took place on the holodeck, or in a holodeck-type environment. Tom Paris didn't really drive a pickup truck around the corridors of Voyager (they found the truck out in space), and the only time when he drove a 20th century vehicle on a planet was when he was literally in the 20th century.
I have no problem with Kirk having interest in centuries old music or paraphernalia (nor did I have a problem with Tom Paris and his hobbies). Maybe it's because I live in an area of the country where grown men and women take great care to dress up in accurate Civil War era garb and re-enact battles that took place 150 years ago. Its normal around here. I'd never say this to any of them but its a form of cos-play.
And these are not hayseed yahoos spouting things like 'The South will rise again'. These people are leaders in the communities and there are professional people among them. Those uniforms and the accompanying accouterments are expensive.
So yeah, Kirk and his music and his bike, I'm good with it.
I'm into old stuff myself - I used to be active in the Society for Creative Anachronism, but it's not "cos-play". That's what people do when they dress up as a Storm Trooper and go to a science fiction convention (I've attended conventions in costume, but back then we called it "wearing a hall costume" or "entering the Saturday Night costume contest"). Historical re-enactment or re-creation involves research and hands-on creation of items (at least in the SCA; I wouldn't know about Civil War stuff). Some people have turned aspects of their SCA activity into RL paying jobs, when they discovered that other people will pay for things like armour, chainmail jewelry, leather goods, clothing, embroidered textiles, hand-calligraphed documents, and so on.
However... while nuKirk may very well have a hobby to do with 20th century stuff, it's off-putting (to me; this is my own opinion which I am not ascribing to anyone else) to see it in this trailer. It gives the impression that he's still "Captain Frat Boy" who never grew up, and not a mature starship Captain who has grown up.
eyeresist said:
Who knows, Kirk may be considered the height of culture in his own time. Extremely unlikely, but still....
If that's true, that culture is doomed. If they want to present nuKirk as cultured, he really needs to grow up.
And ProTip®: if you use the term "Abomination" and "Abomination 2" to describe the other nuTrek movies then you're not going to be taken seriously by a majority of people here. It's like going into a DMB forum and saying Under the Table and Dreaming is a worthless waste of an album.
Well, the beauty of living in a society with freedom of speech (or expression, if in Canada) is that I don't have to care if my opinions mesh with the majority of opinions.
It remains to be seen if this one is "Abomination 3" but I'll make that decision after it comes to either Netflix or somewhere where I won't have to pay to see it.
A funny trailer for a random action movie.
Interesting to read how some applaud to anything and call it "Star Trek" as long as someone wrote "Star Trek" on it. Why not produce Star Trek porn films? I mean Shatner was shirtless all the time and many women were nearly naked anyway and since Star Trek has to open up for new audiences - porn always works!
Shatner's shirtless scenes were mostly during fights, Sickbay scenes, or when he was exercising. Or being interrogated. I can only think of two episodes where he was shirtless during a love scene.
NuTrek already did a gratuitous underwear scene.
How am I not part of the core audience for this movie?
Been watching for a long time? Check. Since 1975.
Trek fan? Check.
Owns all the series? Check.
Owns all the movies? Check.
Buys toys? Check.
Buys novels? Check.
Buys comics? Check.
I'm so confused right now.
Well, let's see...
I've been watching since 1975. I'm a Star Trek fan. I don't own all the series. I own the first 6 movies on VHS. I still have the action figures I bought many years ago, plus a few TNG ones. Novels... well, I've cut back on those either because I'm just not interested in TNG and DS9 anymore, not to mention that I already don't have enough shelf space for the books I already have. I used to buy comics, but don't anymore. I do collect TOS-era print fanzines, but have cut back on that too, since the exchange rate is so awful right now.
So apparently that makes me a part of the core audience for nuTrek. Except that I'm not, because I don't like nuTrek.