In earlier episodes, reference is made to UESPA (United Earth Space Probe Agency). Was this intended to be a separate arm of government, or was it just a precursor to Starfleet?
Well, Vulcan has it own separate starbases (Take Me out to the Holosuite), it's own military starships (Unification), it's own interstellar intelligence service, it's own foreign policy separate from the Federation, has foreign embassies on it's soil (not a consulate), and exchanges Ambassadors with other Federation Members.Vulcan and Andor have as much sovereignty as the State of California.
In Journey to Babel, Ambassador Sarek represented his government, his government being the government of Vulcan, not the government of the Federation. In Journey to Babel, the Member worlds (and not the Federation government) decide if a outside world gets to join the Federation.
In TVH, Kirk and crew were safe from Federation jurisprudence while on Vulcan soil.
Not even close to California.
When have we seen Member worlds being subject to the authority of the Federation Council? The closest was once where the Council set a interstellar speed limit in a certain area of space.They are still subject to the authority of the US Federal government. California doesn't have the ability to invade Texas for example.
Would you like to introduce information from the novels and games into this discussion?
California invades just about every other state all the time. We just call it tourism. We've taken the Alamo three dozen times in the last decade.
As for what the Federation did when Cardassia invaded Bajor. We don't know what they did, but we know the Federation was in a state of conflict with Cardassia over a long period of time until about the time Cardassia left Bajor. It is entirely possible that the Federation was trying to help Bajor, but it led to war with the Cardassian Union.
Couple of points:
1) Given that Federation member races have sovereignty within their own cultures and spheres of influence, it is correct to compare the Federation more with the UN than with the US.
2) At least one example of the Federation using Starfleet for peacekeeping operations was it's intervention between the Klingons and Romulans during the Klingon Civil War.
1) Vulcan and Andor have as much sovereignty as the State of California. They are still subject to the authority of the US Federal government. California doesn't have the ability to invade Texas for example.
1) Vulcan and Andor have as much sovereignty as the State of California. They are still subject to the authority of the US Federal government. California doesn't have the ability to invade Texas for example.
Vulcan and Andor have absolute sovereignty within their own territorial claims. If a Federation citizen commits a crime on Vulcan/Andor/wherever, it is local law they submit to, not Federation law. This is shown numerous times in Trek.
In earlier episodes, reference is made to UESPA (United Earth Space Probe Agency). Was this intended to be a separate arm of government, or was it just a precursor to Starfleet?
The writers just hadn't figured out the finer details yet.
Couple of points:
I see the Federation more like NATO than the UN. The UN seeks to have every nation on Earth as members.
The Federation seems more like an organization of independent member planets with similar values and/or interests. It also seems to serve as a defense alliance, with Starfleet being a joint military force, while each member may still maintain its own local military.
Not exactly. NATO isn't a government. They are all sovereign states that are pledged to defend each other when attacked. Each country maintains full control over independent military forces. The US president for example, cannot order the Canadian army to help invade Iraq.
Whereas the Federation requires independent military forces like the Bajoran Militia to be absorbed into its Starfleet. And Starfleet doesn't answer to any local planetary government, not even Earth. It answers to the will of the Federation Council.
So no, Earth, Vulcan and Andor are no longer sovereign states. Sovereignty means your own government is the highest level of government. The moment they acknowledge the Federation Council and its President and the highest authority, they are no longer sovereign. It's the Federation as a whole that is the sovereign state.
For interstellar matters only.At the end of the day, the Federation Council and its President is considered the central government and the highest level of authority.
Only because we've never allowed it to assume it's full potential authority (arguably correctly, but that is neither here nor there). The Federation is what a fully-realized UN would look like. Another good example of a UN-type government structure was the original US Articles of Confederation (pre-Constitution).Whereas nobody considers the United Nations a government.
I see the Federation more like NATO than the UN. The UN seeks to have every nation on Earth as members.
I don't believe that the Federation aspired to be an universal organization. I don't think it had any intention to have, say, the Romulans, Klingons, Cardassians, Ferenghis, Borgs, Dominion, etc. to become members of club Fed.
Uh, no, not even within the context of that particular film. Dax obviously wasn't human, neither was Valeris or Spock. Oh, and there's the little matter of the then Federation President at that time, who was an Effrosian.And like NATO, the Federation appear to have a dominant member. Within the Fed, that is Earth.
In TUC, the Klingon chancellor's daughter said that "the Federation is no more than a homo sapiens only club." She was attempting to mock Kirk and co. But her point was essentially accurate.
See above.Starfleet seems to be run and manned predominantly by humans. Nothing wrong with that. Often times, an organization functions best when there is a leader.
And because Starfleet is the most important and meaningful organization within the Federation, humans are thus the dominant members of the Fed.
I always thought of the Federation as more of a confederation, like Switzerland, without a strong central government. The individual members govern themselves but they came together for mutual defense and to regulate trade between them and non members.
Uh, no, not even within the context of that particular film. Dax obviously wasn't human, neither was Valeris or Spock. Oh, and there's the little matter of the then Federation President at that time, who was an Effrosian.And like NATO, the Federation appear to have a dominant member. Within the Fed, that is Earth.
In TUC, the Klingon chancellor's daughter said that "the Federation is no more than a homo sapiens only club." She was attempting to mock Kirk and co. But her point was essentially accurate.
http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/President_of_the_United_Federation_of_Planets (scroll down to 2293).
In fact, of the 4 known Federation presidents, 2 were not-human (Ra-ghoratreii [2293, name from non-canon], and Jaresh Enyo [2372])
There are plenty of non-human members of the Federation, both within Starfleet and otherwise
http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Unnamed_USS_Enterprise_%28NCC-1701%29_personnel
3 of the 4 named founding members of the Federation are non-human species as well
http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Federation_members
See above.Starfleet seems to be run and manned predominantly by humans. Nothing wrong with that. Often times, an organization functions best when there is a leader.
And because Starfleet is the most important and meaningful organization within the Federation, humans are thus the dominant members of the Fed.
in the DS9 episode "Rapture" a Starfleet Admiral states "The Bajoran militia must be absorbed into starfleet," absorbed as in to accommodate, or take in, this might be like when a new member nation in NATO alters their military command and support structures so as that they can co-ordinate joint operations with other NATO members . But the member retains direct control over their military.Federation membership requires that you relinquish control of your space agency/armed forces and allow them to be absorbed into Starfleet. When Bajor first agreed to sign Federation membership, this was one of Starfleet's first priorites.
During TOS the Enterprise carried out mission for the Federation, but also directly for Earth.By the 23rd century ... Earth no longer had absolute control over Starfleet.
Why would the sovereign Members of the Federation acknowledge the Federation Council as their highest authority? That makes no sense. They're not subordinate states in a nation, they're members in a interstellar organization. A defense and trade allianceThe moment they acknowledge the Federation Council and its President and the highest authority, they are no longer sovereign. It's the Federation as a whole that is the sovereign state.
The Federation does have a governing body, but it has no authority over the Members, the Members (collectively) have authority over the Federation.At the end of the day, the Federation Council and its President is considered the central government and the highest level of authority
So no, Earth, Vulcan and Andor are no longer sovereign states. Sovereignty means your own government is the highest level of government. The moment they acknowledge the Federation Council and its President and the highest authority, they are no longer sovereign. It's the Federation as a whole that is the sovereign state.
ST IV. If what you said was true, then Vulcan could not offer asylum to Kirk and his crew. They would have immediately been turned over to Federation authorities.
For interstellar matters only.At the end of the day, the Federation Council and its President is considered the central government and the highest level of authority.
in the DS9 episode "Rapture" a Starfleet Admiral states "The Bajoran militia must be absorbed into starfleet," absorbed as in to accommodate, or take in, this might be like when a new member nation in NATO alters their military command and support structures so as that they can co-ordinate joint operations with other NATO members . But the member retains direct control over their military.Federation membership requires that you relinquish control of your space agency/armed forces and allow them to be absorbed into Starfleet. When Bajor first agreed to sign Federation membership, this was one of Starfleet's first priorites.
Never was relinquishing control mentioned, the Bajorians (once a member) would need to be able to have their forces interact with other Federation forces.
NATO regularly conducts integration exercises with the Navies and land forces of it's members military's. The BALTOPS 2015 exercise this past June involved ships from 17 NATO and partner countries, and also Marines from four nations.
During TOS the Enterprise carried out mission for the Federation, but also directly for Earth.By the 23rd century ... Earth no longer had absolute control over Starfleet.
Why would the sovereign Members of the Federation acknowledge the Federation Council as their highest authority? That makes no sense. They're not subordinate states in a nation, they're members in a interstellar organization. A defense and trade allianceThe moment they acknowledge the Federation Council and its President and the highest authority, they are no longer sovereign. It's the Federation as a whole that is the sovereign state.
The Federation is never once called a sovereign state, but twice it's directly called an alliance (Kirk and Daniels).
The Federation does have a governing body, but it has no authority over the Members, the Members (collectively) have authority over the Federation.At the end of the day, the Federation Council and its President is considered the central government and the highest level of authority
Vulcan offered political asylum to Kirk? I don't remember this part. Can you recall which scene this was in?
Kirk mentioned being in a "Vulcan exile" but nothing specific that the Vulcan government was preventing Starfleet from arresting them.
In fact, McCoy was complaining that Starfleet wouldn't send a ship to pick them up even when they agreed to face prosecution. They had to fly themselves home.
And the Federation government is not only responsible for foreign affairs. All Federation citizens are subject to its federal laws whether you are from Vulcan or the colonies way out in the DMZ.
They also have a constitution and a Federation supreme court.
So the Federation government is the highest level of authority in issues of domestic law as well.
Just like the how the US supreme court is the highest authority in its land. There's no court in the United Nations or NATO that can overturn its decision
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.