If that's the most recent example you can come up with, then this is hardly a pressing matter, no?Of course, that's nothing new either. Remember Fatty Arbuckle?
If that's the most recent example you can come up with, then this is hardly a pressing matter, no?Of course, that's nothing new either. Remember Fatty Arbuckle?
95% of what's called "cancel culture" is nothing of the sort. It's just a boogey man inflamed by the GOP.
I prefer LeVar Burton's term (as mentioned earlier in the thread): Consequence culture.
I think overall cancel culture is a good thing, assholes like Whedon deserve to be canceled, but I do think they go a bit overboard at times. If it comes out that someone is a horrible person, with a long history of abusive and/or offensive behavior then they deserve to be canceled, but I don't think it's fair when they want to ruin a persons life over one, relatively minor incident, or situations like what happened with James Gunn, where it was stuff that didn't actually harm anyone, that happened decades ago, that the person stopped doing and has apologized for repeatedly.
Transphobia deserves a harsh response just like any other form of bigotry. It's not an opinion, it's harmful misinformation that directly leads to violence against trans people. She destroyed her career and got her fanbase to turn on her because she couldn't stop herself from repeatedly being transphobic, she deserves no sympathy.
Her opinion, that trans women are men, is the reason a lot of trans women are murdered. She may not intend harm, but harm is the direct result of her "opinion". Her position as a beloved writer just makes it worse since so many will hear it and it will give legitimacy towards those who do want to actively harm trans people. One of the results of the controversy that got stirred up because of her has lead to trans people in the UK losing access to medical care, which will also lead to deaths. I have sympathy for the trans people directly affected by her "opinion" and the "opinions" of other bigots like her. None of whom will ever feel a fraction of the pain they cause.I respect your viewpoint on that, but I do think there is a difference between expressing an opinion that is shared by a majority of people of a certain age is different than acting on that opinion with violent actions. Change is happening, but it takes time. I consider myself an ally, but I still have a great deal to learn.
Her opinion, that trans women are men, is the reason a lot of trans women are murdered. She may not intend harm, but harm is the direct result of her "opinion". Her position as a beloved writer just makes it worse since so many will hear it and it will give legitimacy towards those who do want to actively harm trans people. One of the results of the controversy that got stirred up because of her has lead to trans people in the UK losing access to medical care, which will also lead to deaths. I have sympathy for the trans people directly affected by her "opinion" and the "opinions" of other bigots like her. None of whom will ever feel a fraction of the pain they cause.
The people who tried to reach out to her were ignored or attacked. She wasn't interested in it, just repeating bigotry. That's the problem with bigots, they don't want to change. They believe they're right and nothing can change that. You can't get her to sit down with a trans person so she can learn to understand them anymore than you can get a Nazi to try to understand a Jewish person. It's also really not the job of trans people to constantly do the emotional labor for TERFS and other bigots, that's what allies are for.I do not disagree with that assessment. I wonder if anyone ever approached her and invited her to spend time getting to know trans people in a safe space and learn more about them as people. I am a firm believer that the way to building empathy and understanding is building connections between people first. It is harder for somebody to make clinical generalizations when those generalizations include people one cares about.
I doubt she'd see the need. J.K.'s a very progressive and inclusive transphobe - she's on record as saying that trans women should be free to live how they want without judgment and that she's supportive of their right to do that.I wonder if anyone ever approached her and invited her to spend time getting to know trans people in a safe space and learn more about them as people.
It's the community when you share their opinions, it's the mob when you don't. See how this works?Is Consequences when you agree with the mob, it's Cancel Culture when you don't.
This is the part where you have to read the room and keep your thoughts to yourself.JK Rowling is not 'transphobic'. Speaking biological fact is not 'transphobic'
JK Rowling is not 'transphobic'. Speaking biological fact is not 'transphobic'
JK Rowling is not 'transphobic'. Speaking biological fact is not 'transphobic'
She's transphobic. Science is your friend.*
JK Rowling is not 'transphobic'. Speaking biological fact is not 'transphobic'
JK Rowling is not 'transphobic'. Speaking biological fact is not 'transphobic'
Could you provide a link to this information? Not that I don't believe you, because I do, I would just like have access to that information myself.Trans people have uniform distinct unique physical and genetic characteristics, that cis people do not.
CITATION NEEDED.
Seriously.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.