Three guards were killed in the explosion Karli set off. In official US Military terminology this is called "collateral damage." Those guards were "protecting" food and medicine that was supposed to be going to refugees. How many refugees died from malnutrition and disease for want of those supplies? Those guards were not "innocent." Meanwhile Walker chopped the head off of someone who hadn't killed anyone.
I didn't say they were innocent, I said they were at her mercy. She tied them up and then blew up the building they were in for no other reason than to execute her prisoners, deliberately and with premeditation, in the most spectacular way possible. She was entirely done Robin-Hooding those supplies and nothing was stopping her from leaving. Karli took Mama Donya's death as a malicious, personal attack by the GRC and wanted to respond in kind to the perceived murder of her loved-one.
And it's giving an uninformed child a lot of the benefit of the doubt to assume those supplies weren't stockpiled for a reason, and that someone else isn't going to go hungry because she decided that her righteous anger and bloodstream full of Nazi drugs made her the only person with the moral clarity to decide who gets help when.
The US Government does not own the copyright to "Captain America" and has no legal authority to proclaim any person with that title. It is not an actual position or rank that is authorized by any regulation or legislation. The ownership of The Shield is "a grey area." The government put Walker on the stage as the new "Star Spangled Man" just because they could. They may as well have "appointed" him as the new Mayor McCheese. The whole thing was a charade to begin with.
It looked pretty government-backed when the Army was paying for Steve's equipment, personnel, drugs, and Vita-Rays in World War II. And saying both "they have no legal authority" and "they did it because they could" is a contradiction. Either the Government can legally assign someone to the position of "America, Captain" or they can't.
The unnamed Flag Smasher didn't kill Lamar and was in fact the one standing behind Walker holding him when Lamar was killed. Walker was out of control and delusional. He was guilty of murder, or innocent by reason of insanity. Pick one. Hint: whatever offences anyone else committed does not let him off the hook, or justify his continued freedom.
Hm. Your description of Walker as being delusional when he blamed the man he killed for Lamar's death rings a bell. I could've sworn someone else described that exact behavior with that exact word in this thread, possibly in the quote directly above that line.
Anywho, again, the fight was over, Walker had subdued the Flag Smasher, and nothing was stopping him from binding his hands and hauling him in by the book except his own rage. In my view. In your view, by abetting Karli's theft of needed medicines and supplies, he was what the military calls "collateral damage," so long as we just quietly ignore that he was killed after the fighting was over in retribution for the actions of an associate and nothing he personally was culpable for.
Karli and Walker were anything but in the same place. Karli took it to the extreme the way so many groups have been forced to for generations. Walker was making up for a small penis.
Yes, Karli was just like like the American frontiersmen who bravely massacred native villages once they realized the people whose homes they'd stolen weren't actually dead and wanted to live their own lives. They were promised free land and opportunity in a magical place that they were told had no people in it, and by hook or by crook, they were going to make that true.
Walker was ordered to put on a monkey suit and take down an international larceny ring that was founded on the principle that three and a half billion people deserved to be dead because it had been more convenient for them that way, and attempted to do so to the best of his limited ability. He wasn't joy-riding around hanging out with his buddy doing spec-work for the Air Force because he was bored, like some superheroes I could name. It's totally misreading the situation to paint Walker as being vainglorious, sadistic, or narcissistic. He had enough actual flaws without inventing new ones.
Likewise, Karli was obviously motivated by anger that Thanos's great work was undone, and wanted to undo that undoing, and didn't particularly care how or why, so long as the returnees who were ruining her life stopped doing so. Maybe they should be the ones in the camps being shipped off to their ancestral homes. Maybe they should be at the back of the line for jobs and food (which, in some cases, they
were, as we saw when Sam tried to apply for a small business loan and was told that having been dead was not an acceptable excuse for his lack of employment history). Maybe she just didn't care what happened to the rest of the world as long as she and her friends were fine.
You're making the mistake of letting yourself be fooled by trappings and slogans. Scratch the surface, and it turns out Karli is fighting for the most entrenched, conservative point of view, the people who are at the top now, benefitting from happenstance and the suffering of others, are the ones who should be protected, and the losers of history should be ignored so they can die off quietly without causing too much stress for those of us lucky enough to have the good life already. People talk a lot about eating the rich, but once you take a couple bites out of them, they'll start to look a lot like Karli Morgenthau, talking about how great things were before
those people started getting all the jobs and homes and healthcare, taking up more than their share. Why should she suffer, she's not the one who disintegrated them? If they want to come back to life, they should take responsibility for themselves the way she did, seizing opportunities to improve her lot, not just getting hand-outs from the government taken from the forgotten men and women.
This is a didactic morality play for children. When Karli is accused of being a supremacist and her response is to say that, no, the people she dehumanizes actually
deserve to be murdered, a supremacist is someone who dehumanizes and murders people who
don't deserve it, you should realize that's exactly what supremacists think, and not just write it off as not fitting with your preconceptions of what someone coded as an activist would believe. There are plenty of grifters, show-horses, career martyrs, and, recently,
the literal CIA, who are all eager to exploit the human tendency to evaluate things superficially to co-opt your energy for their own ends without actually advancing the causes you care about, and if you can't tell when comic-book supervillains like Karli Morgenthau or Erik Killmonger are preying on your sympathies to con you, how are you going to realize when it's happening in real life?