I watched some Bundesliga over the weekend: Bayern Munich vs. FC Augsburg. Not a bad match - Augsburg was clearly overmatched but they played tough and never let Bayern completely overwhelm them.
And to be fair the referee ended up being on Bayern's side.
Our secret football thread is all growed up. Sex sells.
Soon even Guy Gardener will be here suggesting that the offside rule should incorporate an exploding goose.
Comfortable win for Chelsea as expected (4 - 0). Wenger is an idiot (lost 2 - 1). Bring Klopp now. Good away win for Zenit.
Soon even Guy Gardener will be here suggesting that the offside rule should incorporate an exploding goose.
I thought #KloppfortheKop is the next big thing on twitter.
I don't really see Wenger leaving, like, ever.
Ciro Immobile
Fifpro wants to abolish transfer fees and make it easier for players to move between clubs while respecting contracts. It believes its members have less freedom of movement than other workers when a club is able to demand a fee for a footballer under contract. Its lawyers also plan to argue that the existing system is anti-competitive because it places disproportionate power in the hands of elite clubs who can afford to pay large transfer fees.
Other Fifpro objectives include an end to the loan system, restrictions on squad sizes and the capping of payments to agents.
“Whatever happens, it is a historical moment not only for Fifpro but for professional football,” said Fifpro’s general secretary, Theo van Seggelen, who claims to represent 65,000 players across 65 countries. “We were responsible for Bosman, we were responsible for the declaration of objectives in 2001. We thought we had a good position then but we were tackled from behind.
In the complaint to the Directorate General of EU Competition, Fifpro will argue that several opt-outs from European law agreed under a 2001 settlement have not been adhered to and are no longer in the public interest. They plan to argue that the transfer system is anti-competitive and also breaches European law on restraint of trade and freedom of movement.
The Commission could take six to 12 months to reach a decision and, if it rules in favour of Fifpro, lawyers estimate that it could take one to two years of horse trading beyond that to come up with a new set of rules.
Fifpro will argue that the transfer system breeds instability, with small clubs gambling on selling one or two star players to sustain themselves.
One vision of the future would provide a “protected period” where neither club nor player could break their contract within the first two or three years (unless there were extenuating circumstances where they were not getting a game). Then the player would be able to buy out the remainder of his contract and switch clubs. It would also limit contracts to a maximum of, say, four years.
That's a pretty mighty lobby (you might even say cartel) they're going up against.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.