The point is, you don't trust a word they say.
I need to read up on it more but all I see from the No camp is fear mongering. I'll be voting yes because progress doesn't have to be perfect and representation is always progress. Once you enshrine something you build on that.
I was watching the Women's Soccer World Cup (YES i WATCHED A SPORT, THERE WAS BEER INVOLVED) and I was impressed that the signs on the fences around the pitch (wait.. field?) had Melbourne Narrm on them. I don't know if that's always the case but I was impressed. I guess I am out of touch as I assumed the usage of Melbourne's indigenous name was mostly in the realm of hipster instagram, I had not seen it used "officially".
What's the level of information the average person gets on this referendum? I don't watch regular tv. Are there informative ads? Everyone I talk to is confused about what it means and what will change.
As for the Voice, as I said, I see who's against it, and follow my instinct. From what I have read, it's like an advisory committee, explaining to us gubbas what we don't know about the history and culture of the land. Which trees are sacred and which not. Where the graves are, Where the sacred caves with ancient art are (think Juukun Gorge) so they aren't wiped out. Now, they can't order those things stopped, but they can strongly advise the Government, and the Govt can weigh up both sides, and act accordingly. They don't have this power to throw farmers off their land, which is the scare campaign in West Australia says right now. No actual power, all they has is a Government that will listen. When the LNP gets back in, fuck knows.
I was on my daily walk when I saw a large NO sign on a letter box. My hopes lifted because I thought it was a ‘No stadium’ sign but when I got closer and was able to read the smaller writing it said ‘No vote’ and I was disheartened
If you want to know which way to vote in the referendum, just look at the quality of those voting No.