• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Casting of this series is extremely bad

Sci-fi fan

Lieutenant Commander
Red Shirt
Not everyone is totally bad, there are 2 or 3 exceptions but the overwhelming majority of main (MAIN!) characters are either obnoxious or dull. It's hard to manage that even on a low budget so whoever is responsible for casting is just bad at their job.

Who was it? Have they casted before? If they casted before was it done well? Are there examples of them casting something in a good way? Because if there is, I don't know what happened now.
 
Could it be perhaps that your estimation is incorrect and as a personal opinion really doesn't hold much water?
I find all of the folks in the show to be the complete opposite of what you describe and are what make DISCOVERY to be one of the best Trek iterations among them all.
(as well as the writing this season)
:shrug:
 
I don't understand you complaining about the casting in the title, then the characters in the body. Casting means the cast - the actors picked to play the characters. By saying the casting is bad, you're saying the acting is bad, or at least the actors were picked for the wrong roles.

I think you can argue that characterization in Discovery has been very weak until recently, with many of the main characters basically existing as plot devices and nothing more (what they did with Stamets up until a few episodes ago for example, where all he was there to do was spout spore-babble or mourn Culber). But that is not casting.
 
Last edited:
Not everyone is totally bad, there are 2 or 3 exceptions but the overwhelming majority of main (MAIN!) characters are either obnoxious or dull. It's hard to manage that even on a low budget so whoever is responsible for casting is just bad at their job.

Who was it? Have they casted before? If they casted before was it done well? Are there examples of them casting something in a good way? Because if there is, I don't know what happened now.

I think the casting has been the consistent positive of Discovery for the two seasons its been on the air. Whoever is in charge has earned a healthy bonus.

Wish I could say the same for the writing and designs on the show.
 
I think the acting has been very good.

As for characters, I think they have been mainly good, some great -- but there are two characters that I think need tweaking (and that's no fault of the actors playing the role, but rather the writers).

First, I think Burnham needs to lose the attitude of: "Every problem I see I'll make it my own mission to fix it on my own, and will feel personally responsible to see it through by myself".

It's been discussed to death already that she's not a "Mary Sue", but I can see why some people argue that she is, because she seems to feel she is the only person who can bear the weight of the world, and feels she must do it herself. That's fine as the beginning of a character's journey and growth, but the writers really need to have her finally grow past that feeling. It makes for an isolation of that character from the other characters, and in turn a dull show because the best part of most TV shows -- the chatacrer interactions -- is missing.

Secondly: Stamets. Anthony Rapp is fantastic, but the character seems to have had little to do other than lament the loss of Culber (first physically, now emotionally). We really don't get enough of that "slighty prickly" character we got in the first few episode last season.

I liked that Stamets; he was a bit McCoy-like in that Stamets wasn't afraid to speak his mind about things being done a certain way, but he still had a warmth to him, even when he was being prickly. We get glimpses every so often of that Stamets, such as when we told Tilly she will become a magnificent captain one day, but talks too much. Or recently when he said that Spock and Burnham's debating was helping him work, but a few minutes later told them he changed his mind, and realized their discussion was distracting.

We need more of that Stamets, rather than too much of the brooding aimless one.
 
Last edited:
Casting Rebecca Romijn as Number One was ... well odd. Why cast someone that talented, and then bearly use them?

More strange casting than bad though. They could have just gone with a average no name actress
 
Last edited:
Casting Rebecca Romijn as Number One was ... well odd. Why cast someone that talented, and then bearly use them?

More strange casting than bad though. They could have just gone with a average no name actress

We know she still has at least one more scene coming, which involves her being on the bridge of the Enterprise.
 
Casting Rebecca Romijn was Number One was ... well odd. Why cast someone that talented, and then bearly use them?

More strange casting than bad though
When I heard she was cast as Number One, I immediately saw her character in The Librarians as being similar to what I imagine Number One is like. So I was perfectly OK with the choice.

Romijn's character in The Librarians seemed not overly concerned with being feminine and was quite able to hold her own -- physically, emotionally, and intellectually -- against anyone who might be a threat to the Librarians with whom she was tasked to protect (she was the Librarians' Guardian -- i.e., their bodyguard.)

Similarly (and only going by what we saw in The Cage), I feel Number One is a no-nonsense woman who could hold her own with her male counterparts on all levels, but still be a woman.
 
Last edited:
Casting Rebecca Romijn as Number One was ... well odd. Why cast someone that talented, and then bearly use them?

More strange casting than bad though. They could have just gone with a average no name actress

The thinking could be that she's an iconic character (in some respects), so they put out feelers to search of a big-name actress willing to appear for a small fee in a couple episodes and Romijn was one name that came up.
 
The thinking could be that she's an iconic character (in some respects), so they put out feelers to search of a big-name actress willing to appear for a small fee in a couple episodes and Romijn was one name that came up.
I was about to say that they might have gotten her at a discount because she's a huge Trek fan and wanted to be involved, like Samuel Jackson in the Prequel Trilogy.
 
Not everyone is totally bad, there are 2 or 3 exceptions but the overwhelming majority of main (MAIN!) characters are either obnoxious or dull. It's hard to manage that even on a low budget so whoever is responsible for casting is just bad at their job.

Who was it? Have they casted before? If they casted before was it done well? Are there examples of them casting something in a good way? Because if there is, I don't know what happened now.
The casting is just fine. The actors may not always be used to their full potential, but there's only so much that actors can do with material like "yes, sir."

Kor
 
Casting Rebecca Romijn as Number One was ... well odd. Why cast someone that talented, and then bearly use them?

More strange casting than bad though. They could have just gone with a average no name actress
There are 5 episodes left. hard to say until we've seen all 14 as Ethan Peck didn't really appear as Mr. Spock until episode 8 (yes, we had glimpses from his SB 5 stay, but we didn't see anyone really interacting with his as the character until Ep. 8.)
 
Whatever problems the show has had, and despite being one of those 'people with a number on the end of their names that loves DSC without reserve or whatever the cool kids were saying (yeah.. "I can read" -Jett Reno)' I freely admit it has had problems, there have been zero problems in casting. It's the strongest casting choices I've seen from Star Trek.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top