• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Thats it. I dont consider Disc , SNW , or Picard cannon

Status
Not open for further replies.
The moment the first few people came in trying to look "tough" by "challenging me, aka taking the side of the talentless hacks of paramount, the rest of you came in mindlessly so easily PEER pressured to copy the opinions of everyone else so you can fit in and be part of the crowd.

I suppose there's no true fan anymore.

Paramount releases garbage and says "you better watch this and like it", and all of you say "yes sir. Please love me. Please like me. I'll be peer pressured to do whatever you say and support you, and insult the real fans anytime I see one, and peer pressure the rest to do so also, just please let me fit in with the crowd and with the times, no matter which talentless hack happens to be running it".
How about less peer pressure to consider the new garbage Canon, and more self reflection.

Most of you here I assume grew up watching tos through ent. Most of you here surely knew how bad discovery was when it came out. Nothing made sense in that show. But look at all of you today. Peer pressured to like these shows just to fit in and get attention.

I don't care if we lived in a world where people would laugh at me, throw me down the spire of commerce on ferenginar, or execute me, I'd STILL get right in the faces of those talentless hacks and push them down in their place and bring back the best of the best from tng/ds9/voy/ent to replace them. But I suppose we live in a world of fear. Everyone wants to.be liked and fit in, and theyre afraid to agree with the person they KNOW deep down is rifht, simply because the challengers supporting the status quo outnumber us (because they were peer pressured into it anyway, which is sad)
 
Sometimes, I have to remind myself I'm not a mod anymore.

I don't care. All of you people can laugh at me and hate me for all I care. Your CONFORMIST "opinions" are irrelevant to me. And I'm willing to bet at least HALF the people.here feel the same way but are just afraid to speak out fearing the onslaught of the conformists coming at them to destroy their online reputation. Anyone here who attacks fans for pointing out their dislike of new trek by trying to destroy their reputation, is a despicable shill. If you really like new trek, use arguments. But all I see is peolle going after reputations to force conformity because there is not ONEreason for anyone to like new trek other than a DESPERATE desire to fit in with the current status quo. Oh how well they exploit people's fear of loneliness.
I haven't seen ANY arguments for why new trek is good. None. Everytime people point out the obvious, we have desperate conformists shills attacking only the persons reputation as opposed to accusation, in some desperate hopes that their owners they're shilling for will give them some bonus points, candy, or invite them to their party or something. Please, explain to us why nutrek is actually good or better than 60s-90s trek. We are waiting.

I know half the people here agree with me but conform out of fear. Nutrek, is bad. And if you believe it's good, enlighten us with some facts rather than being a conformist shill
 
Let's not forget how people attacked Shatner for pointing out the obvious that "roddenbery would be turning in his grave" at the new trek a few months ago.

So what are you conformists with no facts to explain why new trek is good, going to attack Shatners reputation too? Give me a break. New trek sucks and I don't care what copycat conformist afraid to speak the truth and thus conforms to fit in, says about me. It sucks. I know it. Shatner knows it. But when Shatner said that, instead of one single person pointing out some facts why new trek is good, all they did is attack his reputation, rather than his accusations, just like how it's happening here
 
.
Let's not forget how people attacked Shatner for pointing out the obvious that "roddenbery would be turning in his grave" at the new trek a few months ago.

So what are you conformists with no facts to explain why new trek is good, going to attack Shatners reputation too? Give me a break. New trek sucks and I don't care what copycat conformist afraid to speak the truth and thus conforms to fit in, says about me. It sucks. I know it. Shatner knows it. But when Shatner said that, instead of one single person pointing out some facts why new trek is good, all they did is attack his reputation, rather than his accusations, just like how it's happening here
QuestionableNimbleAchillestang-size_restricted.gif
 
I don't care. All of you people can laugh at me and hate me for all I care. Your CONFORMIST "opinions" are irrelevant to me. And I'm willing to bet at least HALF the people.here feel the same way but are just afraid to speak out fearing the onslaught of the conformists coming at them to destroy their online reputation. Anyone here who attacks fans for pointing out their dislike of new trek by trying to destroy their reputation, is a despicable shill. If you really like new trek, use arguments. But all I see is peolle going after reputations to force conformity because there is not ONEreason for anyone to like new trek other than a DESPERATE desire to fit in with the current status quo. Oh how well they exploit people's fear of loneliness.
I haven't seen ANY arguments for why new trek is good. None. Everytime people point out the obvious, we have desperate conformists shills attacking only the persons reputation as opposed to accusation, in some desperate hopes that their owners they're shilling for will give them some bonus points, candy, or invite them to their party or something. Please, explain to us why nutrek is actually good or better than 60s-90s trek. We are waiting.

I know half the people here agree with me but conform out of fear. Nutrek, is bad. And if you believe it's good, enlighten us with some facts rather than being a conformist shill
I'm not a fan of the Kelvin Films or Lower Decks and I'm iffy on Strange New Worlds.

While we're at it: I also don't like most of the TNG Films or ENT.

If I were a "conformist", I'd love it all. I don't.
 
And if you believe it's good, enlighten us with some facts rather than being a conformist shill
Good characters, who are dynamic, feel real and deal with real problems.

Thanks.

I also don't like TNG, VOY, ENT, parts of Picard (season 2, especially), parts of Discovery, Lower Decks and decisions on SNW. Trek, as always, is a mixed bag for me.

Conformist? A conformist is the person who insists the past was way better, TNG the best, TWOK the best, etc.. I was there; not everyone agreed it was.
I suppose there's no true fan anymore.
There never was. What a stupid moniker. Who determines such a status?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top