You could say the exact same thing about each and every new Midnight'sEdge or Doomcock video. They include the exact same damn "sources", which usually is a mixture of public documents, and personal tweets, blogs or emails between the two. Or just some rando conspiracy theories from Twitter. All heavily slanted.It's hardly spam if each of the posts linked by you have new, pertinent information, no?
And thankfully we're not allowing these types of videos here either.
AxaMonitor is not a "news" site. This is an activism site reporting about it's own actions in a pretend neutral tone with "commentary" sections added. It's spam.
To contrast:
THIS is what a good post about an opinion piece with some good information looks like:
I saw this recommended on twitter, it was a good watch.
He originally supported Anas, but is now questioning his stance.
It's informative, it's opinionated, but it's not pretending to be anything it isn't (aka a "news" site), there's no blatant user-action calls, it's not reporting about itself in third person, and most importantly it's not hidden advertisement with an agenda.
AxaMonitor in contrast very obviously wants in on the exact same ad revenue pie as Midnight'sEdge and Doomcock, but by producing constant content for the other side of the debate. But equally uninformative and divisive bullshit to rile up fans and push subscription numbers.
Last edited: