• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers "Superman & Lois" Season 3

I hear they are getting ride of Superman and Lois and all of the characters except Sam Lane, General Hardcastle and Sophie. All the other characters are going to die offscreen and when the new season rolls around we will find out Sam and Hardcastle fell in love and adopted Sophie and them being her parents will be what season 4 will be about.
 
It's not cheap for John and Natalie to fight crime. So either they're gone or Lex has some way to override their suits to render them useless.

If Kyle sticks around, there probably won't be one fire for him to put out.
 
It's not cheap for John and Natalie to fight crime. So either they're gone or Lex has some way to override their suits to render them useless.

Good point. I figured we might lose them, although it would suck for the show to lose its only black cast members. The alternative is to keep them and ditch the Lang/Cushings, but given the show's family-drama focus, that seems unlikely.
 
More of the same:

Seeing reports now that Walsh's wife said on social media that he was offered recurring status for three episodes and turned them down. Also that Inde Navarette is saying she won't be in season 4, at least not as a regular.
 

Not a fan of this decision, but its not particularly rare for a series on its last legs to cut characters before the end.

Unless most of S4 takes the Kents out of Smallville (forced by Luthor / on the run / life-changing events for the world, etc.), the current casting news is not going to be easy to explain away in a setting where everyone is practically living in their neighbors' home.
 
Jesus. "Bloodbath" is right. :eek:

I'll miss most of these actors/characters a lot. Per the original Deadline article, however, "The hope is for the septet to guest star/recur next season, reprising their roles, subject to interest on their part and availability."

https://deadline.com/2023/06/superm...-michael-cudlitz-promoted-regular-1235417430/

Looking on the bright side, hopefully this means an intense and focused ten-episode story of the Kent-Lane family vs. Lex Luthor, with few distractions from a showdown that -- if the writers rise to the occasion -- could be a high point of Superman TV history.
 
I wonder if the Kents will move back to Metropolis?

That would be the easiest thing to do. Cast lesser known (cheaper) actors in recurring roles as Perry, Jimmy, Cat, Troupe, Lombard, etc., and even though they're new to the show, they're still familiar to the fans of Superman lore.
 
So those characters who are cut, are they cut completely or just as regulars?

Because they can still easily show up as recurring characters to wrap up things.
 
So those characters who are cut, are they cut completely or just as regulars?

Because they can still easily show up as recurring characters to wrap up things.

If they want to. One of them walked already after turning down a handful of season 4 episodes.
 
I’m surprised they cut Sarah. She seemed just as important as the Kent family.
I wonder if they will just move back to Metropolis then.
 
Per the original Deadline article, however, "The hope is for the septet to guest star/recur next season, reprising their roles, subject to interest on their part and availability."

I hope so. It would be a shame to lose them completely. If they structured it right, they could include them in several episodes each spaced out over the season -- with different ones in different episodes so there weren't too many guest stars in any single one -- and make it feel like they were still integral to the story. A number of the Arrowverse shows, and other Canadian productions I've seen, have done that with cast members who were nominally regulars, staggering their appearances so the number appearing in each episode was kept low. And The Flash managed okay with Jesse L. Martin's reduced appearances over the past few seasons.


Looking on the bright side, hopefully this means an intense and focused ten-episode story of the Kent-Lane family vs. Lex Luthor, with few distractions from a showdown that -- if the writers rise to the occasion -- could be a high point of Superman TV history.

I don't think that's a good idea, though. That would fundamentally change the show from a family-focused drama to a more conventional Superman story. What's made season 3 work so much better than season 2 is that intensified focus on family, both the Kent-Lane family and the Mannheim family. It wouldn't do the show justice if its final season were retooled into something so different and so ordinary as yet another Superman-Luthor "showdown." Hopefully they'll find a more novel way to use Luthor that fits into the style and focus of this series and brings it to an organic culmination rather than abandoning it.



That would be the easiest thing to do. Cast lesser known (cheaper) actors in recurring roles as Perry, Jimmy, Cat, Troupe, Lombard, etc., and even though they're new to the show, they're still familiar to the fans of Superman lore.

Two of those characters have already been seen in flashbacks in S&L. Perry was played by Paul Jarrett in the pilot and "A Brief Reminiscence In-Between Cataclymsic Events," and Ron Troupe was played by Charles Jarman in the latter episode. In the series present, Perry has retired and the Planet's editor-in-chief is Samuel Foswell (Dean Marshall). It's reasonable to expect that Ron, Jimmy, etc. have all moved on in their lives and careers since those flashbacks, especially given the shakeups and firings Tal-Rho instituted when he bought the Planet as "Morgan Edge." And there's a good chance that Jimmy and Cat would be doppelgangers of their Earth-38/Prime counterparts, or at least would be similarly far along in their careers.
 
Jesus. "Bloodbath" is right. :eek:

I'll miss most of these actors/characters a lot. Per the original Deadline article, however, "The hope is for the septet to guest star/recur next season, reprising their roles, subject to interest on their part and availability."

That "subject to interest on their part and availability" line is the kind of code showrunners use in place of "the actors knew they were fired, so they moved on to other work. If they're not available, it will not matter too much, since season four suggests a major format shift is coming."


I’m surprised they cut Sarah. She seemed just as important as the Kent family.

The issue with Sarah is that her storyline has largely been one where she acts as a catalyst for Jordan's angst / teen crush drama. Her personal issues were a part of the previous episode, but that is also tied to Jordan, and after awhile, they begin to stagnate in CW muck.

I wonder if they will just move back to Metropolis then.

That would be the best way to handle the disappearing act of supporting characters who were so integral to three seasons' worth of stories.

Lex Luthor kills them all off screen.

You might be closer to an upcoming plot than you realize...or maybe not.
 
I’m surprised they cut Sarah. She seemed just as important as the Kent family.
I wonder if they will just move back to Metropolis then.

OTOH sometimes the Sarah appearances felt like it was shoehorned into episodes at times like "Ok, we need to make sure x/y/z appears". When they did something actually meaningful or impactful it resonated very strongly, but sometimes it just felt like needing to justify why she (or anyone else) was in the regular cast.

But yea. They just basically cut SMALLVILLE out of the show so moving away from it either to Metropolis or possibly somewhere else (maybe in hiding?) would make more sense than explaining why everyone isn't appearing anymore.

Unless they all get sucked into a multiversal wormhole and end up somewhere else and the season is about trying to get home for the series finale.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top