This reminds me how Black Canary took down Superboy in a sparring session in an early episode of Young Justice.The Injustice version for example?
![]()
"Should" is a useless word when it runs up against contradictory information. Superman gets beat in fair fights repeatedly throughout his history. This was just the latest instance.
We're only having this argument because a girl beat him.
I can't believe this argument is still going on.
There is no evidence to suggest anywhere that Superman was depowered. Period.
Supergirl in this universe is just slightly stronger than him. End of story.
Also, there is nothing wrong with Clark recognizing this and owning it. What's he going to do, ask for a rematch?
Actually that's not true. I've said that no one should beat Superman in a fair fight. The commentary about women beating men in a fair fight came as a result of the baseless claims of sexism and the decision to ignore biology in favor of ideology. An in shape, well trained woman, would stand no chance against an in shape, well trained man. That's not sexism. That's biology--something that can only be overcome in fiction, but not in the real world.
In fiction however, Superman is the ultimate symbol of heroism, goodness, strength, power, and wisdom. In this episode, he was treated as inferior to Kara and written to go around telling everyone so. They felt the need to pump up Kara by weakening Superman, which was out of character for Superman. Again, not sexist, as it would be the same even if Kara were a man.
No. It means imposing their politics. The man hating of the last two episodes is not a message I find uncomfortable--it's a message I don't agree with and has no place on a superhero show. Shilling for the democrat party like they did in the episode before this one is not an uncomfortable message, it's imposing their beliefs on the viewer on a superhero show.
If anyone is acting uncomfortable, it's the people crying sexism and hurling personal insults because THEIR opinions are being challenged.
It isn't, but expressing my opinion on that subject in a forum that is designed for doing just that isn't exactly beyond the scope.
Again, putting words into other people. It has nothing to do with Kara being a girl. It has to do with him being the ultimate force for good, for 80 years, and losing to an opponent that is less experienced, and given that they are the same species, physically weaker. The writers made some choices that absolutely weakens the character, not because he lost to a girl, but because he lost at all, and then spent the rest of the episode running around telling everyone she was his better. That's not Superman.
Anyone who watched the episode care to tell me if this is even close to true?![]()
This whole "debate" is like those canon vs fanon arguments that fans of this show called Star Trek get into.
BTW, I think this needs to be mentioned: In spite of being "name-checked" in the Season 3 synopsis, Calista Flockhart will not definitively be appearing on a more consistent basis during the season, as her availability will once again be determined by Calista's availability.
A variant of the my dad can whup your dad?This is actually exactly the kind of argument that kids in elementary school get into over comic book characters.
It's nostalgic and kind of fun, as long as you accept that it will not end with the kids agreeing. Ever.![]()
I think it might have been Superman vs Thor.![]()
I agree. A fantastic series, most notably for what they allow Evil Superman to do.This is one of the lesser evil things that he did in the Injustice comics.
That, I have to say, it's an excellent reading.
DC Comics' Injustice Is the Best Evil Superman Story of All Time
Nobody's telling you you can't express your opinion, but so far I don't see any evidence your opinion is based on anything but preconceived biases.
Yes, because Superman has been around 80 years, and is not a new character.
If they are going to use him, they should use him, not dumb him down to make Kara look good.
I don't see others here saying he was dumbed down. Are you sure that's not just your imagination?
As much as he's not a new character, this Superman is just the latest of many many different incarnations, all of which have had different abilities, qualities, etc.Yes, because Superman has been around 80 years, and is not a new character.
I was curious - apparently Superman has lost a lot of fights...even to a (shock! horror!) woman!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.