^Yes, of course -- but clearly that conceit is not being used here.
One place where the "Superman telekinesis" idea comes in handy is in the stunt commonly used in TV adaptations where Superman (or Clark in Smallville) is just standing on the ground and catches someone falling from a great height, thereby saving their life, when realistically he'd just cut them into three pieces when they slammed into his outstretched arms at terminal velocity. One pretty much has to assume he has the ability to cancel the inertia of anything he touches.
See also the bit in the pilot episode of The Flash where the Flash "saves" the crashing bicyclist by abruptly accelerating him to superspeed in the exact opposite direction from the way he was already moving. That would've just made things much, much worse than actually letting him hit the pavement, unless there were inertial cancellation going on.
One place where the "Superman telekinesis" idea comes in handy is in the stunt commonly used in TV adaptations where Superman (or Clark in Smallville) is just standing on the ground and catches someone falling from a great height, thereby saving their life, when realistically he'd just cut them into three pieces when they slammed into his outstretched arms at terminal velocity. One pretty much has to assume he has the ability to cancel the inertia of anything he touches.
See also the bit in the pilot episode of The Flash where the Flash "saves" the crashing bicyclist by abruptly accelerating him to superspeed in the exact opposite direction from the way he was already moving. That would've just made things much, much worse than actually letting him hit the pavement, unless there were inertial cancellation going on.