• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sulu -- the forgotten lover and racism of the times?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why would anyone be shamed if they did not think what they did was shameful? If the reasoning and behavior is something to be proud of, then by all means, be proud. Keep doing it. Use it among educated people, and see if it works.
You chose to zero in only on my comment about your wielding student opinion, and completely ignored the parts where I did address the original topic. Are you interested in an actual discussion?
 
It's impossible to prove every adverse omission is racism-based, though there have been subtle and not-so-subtle TOS incidents which suggest the possibility of it.

First, in the not-so-subtle, there's the sudden promotion of DeSalle to fifth-in-command in CATSPAW the very moment Uhura would be the natural fifth. DeSalle is the only non-regular Enterprise crewperson ever to sit in the center seat in TOS. It's only his second, and final, appearance. And suddenly his shirt's promoted from yellow to red. Quite convenient. I sense major placating of the South here.:borg:

The next two points are subtler. Takei and Nichelle Nichols were the only two of the key seven in THE WRATH OF KHAN to lack significant scenes or moments. And, if were George Takei, I might even wonder why of all the six major male players, I/he alone was never temporarily killed in TOS.:cool:
 
Apparently, things have not changed much in 50 years. These articles suggest the problems for Asian American male actors and/or how getting films made with an Asian American male lead are virtually impossible . . . with the odds going up significantly if you recast a role as a white character:

http://jezebel.com/5992922/why-arent-asian-actors-getting-leading-roles-in-hollywood

http://seattletimes.com/html/opinion/2019041450_guestderektingxml.html

http://newamericamedia.org/2014/01/...huns-asians-while-new-media-embraces-them.php

Of course, the easy thing to do is just be dismissive of any claims that suggest there might be problems for Asian Americans, especially males, in Hollywood.

To add to those articles:

http://www.racialicious.com/?s=Asian+Americans+in+media

http://www.hyphenmagazine.com/ (magazine has some article on the same topics as your links)

Don't leave just yet, Gassy Man- I like your posts, they are though-provoking!
 
First, I'm not impressed by your bald attempt to shame people by waving your students' reactions in their faces. If you want to refute an argument here, by all means do so, but don't try to pull an "and my minions agree with me."

The inherent trouble with your question is that it can't actually be answered since no one here has access to information which could confirm or deny it. Is it possible neither Sulu or Uhura got a romance because of racism? Is it also possible it just didn't happen because of the luck of the draw? Is either of these things provable unless a smoking gun appears in the form of a memo?

I short, the only answers you're going to get are going to be gut-checked speculation.

I will say "factually" that the production apparently didn't think George was a bad actor. As I recall, one memo regarding the actor contracts actually calls him out as one their "better" actors. I'll try to find it.
Why would anyone be shamed if they did not think what they did was shameful? If the reasoning and behavior is something to be proud of, then by all means, be proud. Keep doing it. Use it among educated people, and see if it works.

I brought up the class reaction as a statement of fact -- if it felt like shaming, then there must be a reason on the part of the person that my students identified and commented on. And students are not "minions." In this case, they are working hard to understand appropriate ways to reason and the fundamentals of using logic, and not straw men arguments or personal attacks, nor dismissing ideas out of hand.

Talk radio and discussion boards like these are excellent "real world" places to see what constitutes argumentation. And the students are doing a fantastic job of identifying the flaws and weaknesses that they see.

I told everyone to chill the hell out, and drop the personal stuff. This entire post has nothing to do with the (supposed) topic, and is nothing but thinly veiled trolling Again.

Knock it off. Last warning.

And please learn to use the multi-quote function.

Thanks.
It's okay -- it's clear that the problems that kept me away before have not resolved themselves but just gotten worse. I'll post one more comment to someone who seems reasonable and open to a discussion and then that will be it.
 
Apparently, things have not changed much in 50 years. These articles suggest the problems for Asian American male actors and/or how getting films made with an Asian American male lead are virtually impossible . . . with the odds going up significantly if you recast a role as a white character:

http://jezebel.com/5992922/why-arent-asian-actors-getting-leading-roles-in-hollywood

http://seattletimes.com/html/opinion/2019041450_guestderektingxml.html

http://newamericamedia.org/2014/01/...huns-asians-while-new-media-embraces-them.php

Of course, the easy thing to do is just be dismissive of any claims that suggest there might be problems for Asian Americans, especially males, in Hollywood.

To add to those articles:

http://www.racialicious.com/?s=Asian+Americans+in+media

http://www.hyphenmagazine.com/ (magazine has some article on the same topics as your links)

Don't leave just yet, Gassy Man- I like your posts, they are though-provoking!
Thanks, Shaka, but I came here in the past for intelligent conversation, and for the most part, got it. I registered many years ago. I then stopped coming a while back because it was clear that the nature of the discussions too often devolved quickly into something else. Of course, finger-pointing would result, the difference being that if one turned the tables on those who start the problem -- in some way to respond in kind or challenge that behavior -- too often, that person is the one singled out for being a problem. That is stifling and unfriendly, as is having what one says -- like simply asking a question -- turned into something completely different by people mis-characterizing it. Perhaps that is something a moderator could address in the future, too. But you can find me on other forums, as I'm a big movie and pop culture guy, for many reasons. I'm not just an educator but also a published author of several works and I'm blessed to have the means to be online while working. Live long and prosper, my friend.
 
But he doesn't even have to be aware that it's happening in order for it to be so. Many people are victims of passive racism without knowing it...

Thing is, is that we would know what his hopes for the character were, whether he communicated those hopes with TPTB and how they reacted to those hopes.

I'm still firmly in the "I don't know" camp. Because, I don't know.
 
. . .

The next two points are subtler. Takei and Nichelle Nichols were the only two of the key seven in THE WRATH OF KHAN to lack significant scenes or moments. And, if were George Takei, I might even wonder why of all the six major male players, I/he alone was never temporarily killed in TOS.:cool:

I'd rather pilot and command a Starship than being temporarily killed any day.
 
I hate the Dr. McCoy love stories, though, and Praise be to Allah, there's only like 2 of them: Nancy the Salt Addict and that Oracle woman. Bones was already a bit old to be Playing the Field, he didn't need no romancing, he was already given plenty else to do.

McCoy also had Yeoman Tonia Barrows as well (from 'Shore Leave') or did you forget?

And how old is too old for a man of McCoy's age, and how do you (and others) get to judge?

Speaking as a red-blooded American male who's almost the same age as De Kelley when he filmed the episode...you're never too old for Tonia Barrows! :techman:

To Gassy Man's students: Maybe you can earn a little extra credit by showing the teach how to use Multi Quote. I'd say that's worth at least an extra 15 points.
 
It's okay -- it's clear that the problems that kept me away before have not resolved themselves but just gotten worse. I'll post one more comment to someone who seems reasonable and open to a discussion and then that will be it.

Several people have been reasonable and open to discussion. You're just not allowing yourself to see it, and selectively ignoring it when people do address the issue in a reasonable fashion.
 
It's impossible to prove every adverse omission is racism-based, though there have been subtle and not-so-subtle TOS incidents which suggest the possibility of it.

First, in the not-so-subtle, there's the sudden promotion of DeSalle to fifth-in-command in CATSPAW the very moment Uhura would be the natural fifth. DeSalle is the only non-regular Enterprise crewperson ever to sit in the center seat in TOS. It's only his second, and final, appearance. And suddenly his shirt's promoted from yellow to red. Quite convenient. I sense major placating of the South here.:borg:

It was DeSalle's third appearance. He was in season one's "The Squire of Gothos" and "This Side of Paradise," making "Catspaw" the third (and final) appearance.

The fact DeSalle made it to season two seems to suggest he was one of the 1st season guests thought to have some sort of potential, so he was worked into the "Catspaw" script. That the character assumed command over Sulu in this episode suggests no bias or skipping over him for the position, since Sulu held temporary command a season earlier in "Errand of Mercy" (and during a tense situation normally reserved for leading characters).


The next two points are subtler. Takei and Nichelle Nichols were the only two of the key seven in THE WRATH OF KHAN to lack significant scenes or moments. And, if were George Takei, I might even wonder why of all the six major male players, I/he alone was never temporarily killed in TOS.:cool:
Let's not forget Takei was supposed to have his promotion to captain scene in TWOK, but the scene was cut. That was major for one of the "B" team, and certainly proof of how his character was viewed behind the scenes. Moving to TUC, Sulu has his own ship. How often do "B" level characters ever receive that kind of promotion? It is rare.

Moreover, on TOS, Sulu was in the captain's char on several occasions, which would have never found its way in front of cameras if the unsubstantiated racism had any merit.

Regarding the topic, as noted time and again, one cannot charge racism as a cause about a specific situation, then fail to offer equally specific evidence about the event & players involved. No conclusion can be reached from false premises dipped in a pool of inflammatory language.

Further, to ignore relevant examples (the scene in "The Way to Eden"), which for 1960s TV counters any notion of Takei facing true racial discrimination is dishonest. Particularly when considering the woman who shared his scene was white. Again, this was 1960s TV.

One cannot allow an agenda-gripped mindset leading to a search for evil that did not exist in the production offices of TOS..

...otherwise, someone would have found it easy to produces something--anything of substance which supports the charge.
 
Last edited:
Sulu had sort of a thing for Uhura in Mirror, Mirror. That should count for something, lol. j/k.
No, it really should count for something. :techman:

Mirror Sulu pursued Uhura, who he thought was Mirror Uhura. I'm not seeing any racism there.
But the fact that the two times he went after her, he was either the "opposite" person he was in the traditional universe or under some sort of inebriated influence suggests it wasn't simply a straightforward romantic issue. Moreover, putting people of color with other people of color is viewed by some people as bigoted, in part because this country literally once had laws that said that was the only arrangement possible among minorities. Even as recent as a year ago, there were many people "outraged" over a Superbowl commercial for cereal that showed a biracial couple with a biracial child, and that was in 2014.

No, what happened in the Mirror Universe wasn't a straightforward romantic issue, but it was George Takei acting the part. That's now a third example of the actor being used in contexts within TOS where his character "tried to get it on with some women." If Scotty was shown having a love interest for the purposes of the OP, even though the women he was interested in did not reciprocate, then so was Sulu. There's no implied racism, because Sulu was not the exception when it came to trying "to get it on with some women."

Every major male character on Star Trek got a love interest except Sulu. Kirk was routinely shown to have them, Spock had several, McCoy had old flames, Chekhov got his, and even Scotty, who would rather spend time with technical manuals, tried to get it on with some women. But not Sulu. Racism of the times?
 
In respect to the topic, I do have to say that I'm still scratching my head over the very weird choices in the JJ films in disconnecting actors' heritage with the heritage of their characters. I thought it was cool to see a Samurai pop out and chase Sulu in Shore Leave. A little nod to the actor's and character's culture there. Would that still be relevant in the JJ verse? I'm sure this has been beat to death in other threads in this forum.. (goes off to search..)
 
Last edited:
As to the Samurai, Sulu was not originally Japanese, right? I've read that here, I think, that he was kinda pan-Asian, with "Sulu" actually being a sea near the Philippines. Later an author (V. McIntyre?) named him Hikaru and Japan-i-fied him, IIRC. My apologies if this has been covered. I do keep coming back to this thread to see if the train has totally wrecked yet, but I haven't read all posts.

(And do NOT argue with me, even reasonably, or you are a hater and I will take my keyboard and leave this board. I will!)
 
. . .
People on this very board have told me the studio wanted more ethnicity on the show (except for Chinese people) that it wasn't just GR. I can't see them saying have lots people of different races but don't let them have romances (though it is possible).

. . .

Wait, what was the problem with casting Chinese people?? lol That's the first I've heard of that.

I'm certain I read somewhere that just about the only nationality not allowed in TOS Trek was Chinese. I can't remember the source. Wasn't there a war on at the time?

I don't know what happened in Omega Glory though.
You seem to be forgeting Key Luke who played Dr. Cory in "Whom Gods Destroy". and the Tsing Tao family in "And the Children Shall Lead".
 
In respect to the topic, I do have to say that I'm still scratching my head over the very weird choices in the JJ films in disconnecting actors' heritage with the heritage of their characters. I thought it was cool to see a Samurai pop out and chase Sulu in Shore Leave. A little nod to the actor's and character's culture there. Would that still be relevant in the JJ verse? I'm sure this has been beat to death in other threads in this forum.. (goes off to search..)

Well, Sulu was born in San Francisco according to Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. So I'd say all bets are off on what his cultural heritage actually is.
 
Try this:

TO: All Concerned
FROM: Gene Roddenberry
DATE: 4-20-66
SUBJECT: Finalized STAR TREK Running Characters
...
SULU -- Ship’s helmsman, to be played by actor George Takei. You saw this same actor in the pilot as ship’s physicist. However, since that role was not too identified, we are moving Sulu up to the helmsman position where greater use of the character is expected. Although an Oriental, Sulu is contemporary American in speech and manner. His exact ancestry will probably never be indicated.
However, he does have something of a Japanese characterization in one thing -- his hobby of space-botany...
 
re. the memo: Trying to give the Asian a better role. Yup, racist.

Though I will grant you a bit stereotyped, as in, "all-Japanese-guys-dig-Bonsai-trees."

DeSalle never had a romance. I am 1/4 French. I am offended. Kyle? No love for a while. Boma? Loner. M'Benga? No ringa on HIS finga. Go figure.

I'm quite a mongrel, but almost half Irish. So . . . cousin Kevin O'Riley? Not unless you count "Kathleen."

The most bigoted production on television! I agree with upthread, start a letter campaign and get this garbage off the air!
 
re. the memo: Trying to give the Asian a better role. Yup, racist.

Though I will grant you a bit stereotyped, as in, "all-Japanese-guys-dig-Bonsai-trees."

Not racist, but stereotypical.

DeSalle never had a romance. I am 1/4 French. I am offended. Kyle? No love for a while. Boma? Loner. M'Benga? No ringa on HIS finga. Go figure.

All these guys were in one or two episodes, not as many as Takei. Too, I wonder if we would have saw Boma or M'Benga get with a girl who looked like the very pretty Yeoman Tamura or the very interesting Yeoman Atkins...on a show that was produced in 1960s Amerikka?;)

The most bigoted production on television! I agree with upthread, start a letter campaign and get this garbage off the air!

Well, it couldn't be bigoted because it seemed to listen to 'fans.' Albeit given the internet wasn't present at the time, and given it was during a certain time in America (or Amerikka) we didn't have feedback going to the production from a diverse group of people who identify as 'black' or 'African American' (or dark-skinned chocolate complexioned folk)....'Asian American'....'white American'....'Afro-Latino'...'Hispanic'...LGBT....etc.

The people who were interested in the show, based on our knowledge of the viewers at the time, took the show at face value; they saw a multi-racial crew on television and probably didn't go further than that.
 
You'd think that Trek BBS members would understand by now that the failure to produce evidence of existence is not proof that something does not exist. After all, no evidence has been produced for the existence of Big Foot or extraterrestrial life, but the lack of evidence does not prove that they do not exist. No matter how often one demands "show me evidence!" and replies "See! You have no evidence," doing so does not prove the absence of a possibility. Also, conflating 1) a possibility of (conscious or unconscious) bias regarding one aspect of a character with 2) charges of vast, evil conspiracies of prejudice towards that character and bone-deep bigotry of a TV series does not disprove the possibility.

Hypothesis: Sulu was not given opportunities for romance, perhaps in a similar way to how other Asian men were often neutered, made into clowns, or seen only as asexual wise men or exotics in 20th century popular culture. This bias could have been conscious or unconscious.
Not disproof of the hypothesis: "Show me evidence! See! You have no evidence! I win!"
Not disproof of the hypothesis: "Oh, so you're saying the entire Star Trek franchise is racist garbage and the production staff was full of bigots?"
Not disproof of the hypothesis: "Sulu the character and Takei the actor were/are well liked by fans and the production!"
Not disproof of the hypothesis: "It happened 50 years ago. Shut up about it already."
Not disproof of the hypothesis: "George Takei is a happy homosexual man."
 
Last edited:
First, in the not-so-subtle, there's the sudden promotion of DeSalle to fifth-in-command in CATSPAW the very moment Uhura would be the natural fifth.


To be fair, Uhura wasn't the natural anything (no pun intended).

Just having a 28 year old black woman as an officer was way out there in 1966. Although she sat on the bridge, there was never any suggestion that she was a senior officer (at least not until TAS). There was only a time or two when she ordered men around, and they had to be "scrubs" wearing low-man coveralls. So of course she would not take command when the top guys were away.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top