I'm not sure what it is but I hope it is a star bathing deck, people on deck chairs, (get it?) lounge around there under the stars when not on duty
I was being sarcastic
That would be pretty cool.I'm not sure what it is but I hope it is a star bathing deck, people on deck chairs, (get it?) lounge around there under the stars when not on duty
My only theory is that building a shuttle that would be designed by the characters and made for the Delta Quadrant was an actual viable story idea that could possibly help Voyager's ratings and open up new threads for new storiesIIRC, the Aeroshuttle was featured in a Voyager comic from 1996 or 1997. Since then it's been included in Ships of the Line calendars. The novels have come up with the explanation that Voyager left before their Aeroshuttle could be installed, with the spot where it would be covered up with a "dummy hull" to explain why we never see it on the show.
It always struck me as odd they never did use or, especially that they chose to create the new Delta Flyer instead of using the Aeroshuttle. According to talk from the designers, it's meant to be a runabout body with wings built around it, meaning they could just reuse the runabout interiors for it instead of building new sets for the interior of the Delta Flyer, saving time and money. Since the Delta Flyer was introduced in Voyager's fifth season (which is during DS9's seventh) they wouldn't have to worry about coordinating the filming schedules much, DS9 didn't use the runabouts very often in their seventh season. And since that was DS9's final season, the set could be saved and used on Voyager hassle free during the sixth and seventh seasons just like the Defiant's bridge was.
why does it make sense to have an indent there?
Everyone agrees that the first season of TNG has not aged well. but here is the thing.. when it was made everyone worked so hard on it. The idea of designing a ship with a "technology unchained" philosophy (mixing the best of technology with improved quality of life) wound up being more than having a wooden railing on the bridge, it was incorporated into every aspect of the bridge's design. Everything from makeup tests on actors to motion control photography of the D resulted in creating long hours for everyone involved, and something that truly felt in line with Star Trek. Every show that bared the name required no less effort to produce, until now. Cheap animation and a crass attitude is not befitting the name Star trek. It's the lowest common denominator.
But I have CBS and I will watch. I'll give it a try. Everyone told me to watch Knives Out and I did and it was garbage but I still watched
I mean, stepping back and thinking about Trek ships logically.
- There is zero reason for any spaceships which do not actually enter an atmosphere to actually be streamlined. Clean lines might look cool, but you can just as well build a jaggedy mess and it will be just as able to travel through space. Unless you think ships are flying through something other than vacuum at warp I suppose.
- While it's never been 100% clear in the Trek verse, we know there are industrial-sized replicators used for ship construction, and power seems to be cheap. Thus I don't think there are serious resource constraints which force you to have a given surface area to volume ratio.
Also did a Trek fanfilm when he was much younger...
It always struck me as odd they never did use or, especially that they chose to create the new Delta Flyer instead of using the Aeroshuttle.
The thing about that picture is that the scale looks off.. if the front of that "ship" is the size of a Runabout (two peopme) than Voyager is VERY small..Per the blueprints, it was supposed to be an Aeroshuttle/Atmospheric Entry Shuttle. Enterprise D plans had a Captain's Yacht as well, but never used so not "teh canon".
The thing about that picture is that the scale looks off.. if the front of that "ship" is the size of a Runabout (two peopme) than Voyager is VERY small..
in all these shows i always think the scale is off particularly when they show actual people near the shipMight have looked like a Danube class front and been scaled up. A shame they never used the thing.
Yeah that is definitely a start. I'm always trying to picture corridors and decks when thinking about scale, and that is where I run into a problem. I love Orville.. but the intersection where there is an elevator and two extremely long straight hallways.. idk where that isI just had a very quick look at Voyager's underside to compare. The Runabouts are apparently 23 meters long, and Voyager is apparently 345 meters. On a bottom down image of the ship, I found Voyager to be 13 (and a bit) aeroshuttles long. I'm despicably bad at maths, but that doesn't sound too far off to me (although the design of the aeroshuttle means it's probably not quite the same length as a runabout, but seems reasonably close). Hopefully someone who is good with math can chime in.![]()
Enterprise D: 642 metersRandom question how big would a 747 be to the Enterprise D? Could you park one in the shuttlebay?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.