• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Steven Moffat reveals the one thing he’d do differently if he was in charge of Doctor Who again

For what it's worth, I have always thought Amy, Rory, and River ran a giant scam on the Doctor to get him to leave Amy and Rory alone, and the Doctor could have taken the TARDIS back to New York at any time but he didn't because River told him he couldn't when he was utterly devastated and he believed it.
Oh, that's an interesting theory. I always found that whole episode kind of shaky, but I did appreciate the emotional impact that it had on The Eleventh Doctor. He was always very clingy, so I think that would be a reasonable explanation.
 
Just hurling shit? As if much of the criticism wasn't valid.

Fair enough. But, it certainly would be hard to quantify "much" in this case.

Keep in mind that no one went into series 5 and beyond wanting to hate the show under Moffat, almost the entire fandom went gaga with excitement, the episodes he wrote under Davies were so well received almost everyone expected one of the greatest eras of Doctor Who ever so something must have happened to change that perception and that was obviously Moffat's showrunning and attitude.

Or maybe fans expectations.

Moffat's season arcs were very obvious right from the start, there was zero sublety with the camera zooming in on a crack at the end of series five episodes for example,

Two words. BAD. WOLF.
Moffat is hardly the only one guilty of obvious arcs and lack of subtlety.

there was the laughable attempt at creating tension with the doctor being killed "for real" in series six, there was Clara who didn't start as a character but as a mystery to be solved and then became a character I despised.

I agree with that. I thought a mystery of the Impossible Girl shouldn't be one to a Time Traveler. That said, there were still great episodes that season and I didn't feel the need to get on the internet and hurl vitriol at the show runner.

There was Moffat's need to deal with big events just so he could put his stamp on the series not because it was necessary like the regeneration limit. There was him ignoring the private lifes of the companions although they were at times important (like when super important screwed up best friend Melody was introduced five minutes before she regenerated into River ... why not introduce Melody earlier if that's the plan?), there was his obsession with timey wimeyness when a simpler story would have often been better.

Timey wimeyness literally comes from one of his greater stories. Blink. Why not go with something that works, that people loved?

The prime example for Moffat not using the perfect story he set up himself is Amy's and Rory's exit. In the first half of series seven they were CLEARLY moving on with their lives, getting ready so say goodbye to the doctor and leaving the Tardis for good but then they get suddenly written out by being zapped by an angel and being stuck in the past in New York in a time the doctor cannot go to without blowing up the universe or something and this is presented as final and impossible to circumvent although the very obvious solution would have been to land the Tardis in Jersey and take a train if you can't land in New York.

I agree, the ending of that story makes very little sense. That said, you wanted to end the story in one way, he wanted to end it in another. I feel I can't fault a writer for doing what they want, only the execution.

Moffat often acted like his farts didn't smell and he often had an "You just don't get it" when people actually got it, they just didn't like it!

And fans heaped scorn on them, claiming they can do it better--while having no experience in TV or running a show.
I get it, he didn't live up to expectations. I had problems with his resolutions to his arcs. But, to say he deserved ALL of the criticism, and the method it was delivered in--the hyperbole, the personal attacks, is insane.
 
Keep in mind that no one went into series 5 and beyond wanting to hate the show under Moffat,

Oh, there's a whole bunch of threads at Gallifreybase that prove you so, so wrong.

I'd link you, but oddly enough for a bunch of people supposedly highly intelligent and following possibly the most anarchic fictional character ever, they're a humourless bunch of pricks and banned me for joking about a woman having been stung by wasps. Not wishing that a woman WAS stung by wasps, you understand, but commenting that she might already have been.

Once you wrap your noggin around that, people pre-hating Moffatt seems almost simple by comparison.

But, if you want some objective proof, let's look at those pre-condemning the Thirteenth Doctor because - on top of being over 2000 years old with the ability to change her face and travelling in a sentient Police Box that is bigger on the inside - she's got tits.
 
Last edited:
Oh, that's an interesting theory. I always found that whole episode kind of shaky, but I did appreciate the emotional impact that it had on The Eleventh Doctor. He was always very clingy, so I think that would be a reasonable explanation.

I came up with the theory about Amy, Rory, and River scamming the Doctor pretty much within fifteen minutes of watching "Time of the Angels," because I was trying to make sense out of what I'd just seen. The Doctor's clinginess was a recurring issue throughout Season 7A, and it was obvious that he couldn't let them go unless he absolutely had to, especially since he then goes and sulks on a cloud for years upon years. Everything about their loss felt very "artificial" and maybe that's what it would take to convince the Doctor that they were lost to him.

"The God Complex" was, I felt, a better exit story for the Ponds as regular characters. But that's another problem of Moffat's; he doesn't know when to let something go.
 
^ I don't know, when I went to Scotland, I found them to be amazingly warm and friendly. And, I'm not counting the people I was visiting but random people out in public. Shoot, at a function I attended, one nice woman I didn't know came up to me and kissed me on the lips saying, "I have to kiss the American!" So, I like Scotland . . . a lot!
Oh, I'm sure it's a great place, I'm just making a joke based on things that have been said about it on the show, ironically under Moffat. Like Strax insisting on going to Scotland on his weekends off because it was the most Sontaran place on Earth or something.
Moffat's season arcs were very obvious right from the start, there was zero sublety with the camera zooming in on a crack at the end of series five episodes for example, there was the laughable attempt at creating tension with the doctor being killed "for real" in series six, there was Clara who didn't start as a character but as a mystery to be solved and then became a character I despised.
IMO, the only one of Moffat's seasonal arc which didn't work was the theme of death that was present throughout much of season 9. That was so unsubtle, there might as well have been a bright neon sign in every scene that had written on it "PEOPLE DIE CLARA WILL DIE."
There was him ignoring the private lifes of the companions although they were at times important (like when super important screwed up best friend Melody was introduced five minutes before she regenerated into River ... why not introduce Melody earlier if that's the plan?),
I kind of wondered if Mels was just meant to be a sort of meta-reference to this sort of trope. The whole thing after all seemed way too on the nose. Although...
I'm skeptical that Mels was part of Moffat's plan when he sketched out Series 6 and wrote "The Impossible Astronaut"/"Day of the Moon." I don't know if he didn't have any idea how to link the little girl at the end of "Day of the Moon" with River or if he realized that he had no way of dealing with the emotional devastation of a mother losing her child in "A Good Man Goes to War" would produce, but either way Mels is a poor solution to either problem -- she introduces more questions than answers as a bridge between the little girl in 1969 and Amy's contemporary in 1996, and a childhood friend fifteen years earlier is no substitute for losing a child in the present, no matter what MOffat says.
I suspect this might be closer to the truth.
The prime example for Moffat not using the perfect story he set up himself is Amy's and Rory's exit. In the first half of series seven they were CLEARLY moving on with their lives, getting ready so say goodbye to the doctor and leaving the Tardis for good but then they get suddenly written out by being zapped by an angel and being stuck in the past in New York in a time the doctor cannot go to without blowing up the universe or something and this is presented as final and impossible to circumvent although the very obvious solution would have been to land the Tardis in Jersey and take a train if you can't land in New York.
Moffat really didn't think out the Ponds' departure. IIRC, someone actually did ask him why didn't the Doctor just take the TARDIS to London in 1930 and take a boat to New York and pick them up, and Moffat's answer was "it would still have destroyed New York." This is one problem with the "part-time companions" thing he had going with the Ponds in their final days and for Clara's run, the only way you can get rid of them permanently is through incredibly convoluted means,
 
For all of Moffat's faults, and I'll admit he had his fair share (but I don't necessarily agree with the number or the extremeness), he did give me my third favorite Doctor (Eleventh) and two of my favorite companions ever (Amy and Rory). His tenure produced some of the best individual stories ever (at least since the show returned) such as "The Doctor's Wife," "The God Complex," "The Girl Who Waited," "Vincent and the Doctor," "A Christmas Carol," and "Last Christmas" (among many others and your mileage may vary). His biggest problem was his story arcs.

Honestly, I kind of hope Chris Chibnall avoids story arcs for the most part. Of course, there should be character arcs for The Doctor and her companions, but do we really need these great sweeping story arcs that both Davies and Moffat gave us? Less is more and I would love to see the show go back to "simpler" times of the classic run (aside from the Cartmel Master Plan).

"The God Complex" was, I felt, a better exit story for the Ponds as regular characters. But that's another problem of Moffat's; he doesn't know when to let something go.
The God Complex and Last Christmas were great exits for Amy/Rory and Clara respectively. If they'd stayed like that, they'd be the best-ever companion exits, period.
I completely agree about those of episodes, and if I squint just right, I'm able to pretend those are their actual exit episodes. Also helps that not only were those two episodes great exits for those companions, but they were great stories unto themselves. It's a shame Moffat doesn't know how to let go because that really hurts his writing. Same thing has happened for Bill twofold: Not only not allowing her to keep her tragic ending as a Cyberwoman, but after she was magically fixed from that state, she''s going to return for "Twice Upon a Time." Granted, Davies had the same problem (aside from Donna).
 
Moffat deserves criticism for a majority of the writing failings after season 6, but his tenure did bring about some really cool things. I loved the 50th anniversary special. The return of roundels in the TARDIS, the war doctor story arc, the return of Paul McCann and his regeneration, the return of the time lords and Gallifrey, and the cool trio of Silurian led detective agency in 19th century London, along with the inclusion of new cybermen, Warwick Davis as the Emperor of the human imperium, and the Daleks planet of crazies. There is much to like there.
 
They never left.
That's true, but they certainly weren't many of them in the Smith to Capaldi TARDIS.. I liked the neon roundels added after. They were a nice touch. As for Rori and Amy.. and pretty much anything the Doctor has done in his life, Clara by jumping into his timeline made all his victories possible, as she was countering the great intelligence. So, Moffat basically took the Doctor's past 50 years, and essentially tied all of it to Clara.. So right there, story wise.. that put me off.. alot.
 
I came up with the theory about Amy, Rory, and River scamming the Doctor pretty much within fifteen minutes of watching "Time of the Angels," because I was trying to make sense out of what I'd just seen. The Doctor's clinginess was a recurring issue throughout Season 7A, and it was obvious that he couldn't let them go unless he absolutely had to, especially since he then goes and sulks on a cloud for years upon years. Everything about their loss felt very "artificial" and maybe that's what it would take to convince the Doctor that they were lost to him.

"The God Complex" was, I felt, a better exit story for the Ponds as regular characters. But that's another problem of Moffat's; he doesn't know when to let something go.

Well he's not alone with that, and letting go of companions was as much a chore for RTD as Moffat, and once you get into the realm of people wanting to travel with the Doctor forever you're stuck with how to handle that when the actor wants to leave or the character's run his/her course. So Rose had to be separated from the Doctor by being trapped in another universe she could never, EVER, escape (until she did) Donna had to undergo a mind wipe, Amy and Rory had to be trapped in the past, Clara had to die/be reborn/become immortal/never see the Doctor again, Bill became a Cyberman and then a crazy alien water thing...really the only two modern companions whose departures felt like classic departures were Nardole (very Nyssa) and (ironically given she's perhaps my least favourite character) Martha, and even Martha had to come back several times. Note I'm kinda ignoring Jack and River here, but realistically we did see both their exits. The Face of Boe and Professor River Song both died.

On one level I get it, the Doctor has full control of his Tardis and back in the day he was somewhat adept at abandoning people and never, ever seeing them again, but the modern show's gone too far the other way. Everyone always wants to travel with the Doctor and he can always get them home again and pop round for tea long after they've left.

There must be a middle ground.

I'd like to see more companions who travel with the Doctor almost by accident (Tegan, Ian and Barb) or because they have nowhere else to go (Nyssa, Turlough) and it'd be nice if just sometimes people had had enough. Tegan's exit is still phenomenal, and it's surprising more companions don't effectively get PTSD. Yes they see wonders, but a whole lot of warzones too!

I still liken travelling with the Doctor as being akin to backpacking on your gap year. It's fun and adventurous, and sure some people turn it into a life, but most people get tired of sleeping in tents, tired of the lack of stability, and they want to go home get a job raise a family etc.
 
On one level I get it, the Doctor has full control of his Tardis and back in the day he was somewhat adept at abandoning people and never, ever seeing them again, but the modern show's gone too far the other way. Everyone always wants to travel with the Doctor and he can always get them home again and pop round for tea long after they've left.

I'd like to see more companions who travel with the Doctor almost by accident (Tegan, Ian and Barb) or because they have nowhere else to go (Nyssa, Turlough) and it'd be nice if just sometimes people had had enough. Tegan's exit is still phenomenal, and it's surprising more companions don't effectively get PTSD. Yes they see wonders, but a whole lot of warzones too!

Agree with all of that. And, that Tegan had a great departure, perhaps the best ever. Sometimes you just see too much, experience too much, and her departure didn't whitewash that and that's why she left.

I'll just add that in the modern show, it got even worse over time as it wasn't just the departures that became a problematic chore but also the part-time nature of companions detracted.

I hope Chibnall changes those aspects.
 
I don't hate the idea of part time companions as much as some, and in reality that's what you'd choose surely, to pop off for adventures but still be able to live at home with friends and family etc, but yeah I hope CC quashes this, or at least does something a little different with it.
 
[FONT=Open Sans]
Bah? We saw her teaching class in The Magician's Apprentice and in The Woman Who Lived Clara talks about one of her students the Doctor helped with her homework, and we even see a selfie on Clara's phone of her and the girl.

I can't remember right off but I suppose you're right. "The Magician's Apprentice" is one of my least favorite episodes, so I've forgotten a lot of it. And my mind wanders during the final denouement of "The Woman Who Lived." As far as I'm concerned, the story is over after the Doctor parts ways with Me.

I think JNT gets a bad wrap sometimes.. Sure he presided over the cancellation, however he did have the BBC director trying to kill it, and admittedly so in later interviews. It was also a budget issue, and hiatus, BBC strikes, and shoddy time schedules. JNT had a lot that was hitting him all at once. I think he Struck Gold quite a few times tho, even in the latter series, with Remembrance of the Daleks.. I still love that epi even today.

Agreed that JNT probably deserves more credit than he gets from fans simply for keeping the show going and promoting the show. His problem was that, while he was a great showman, he wasn't very good at running the show. Granted, I think part of his problem was that he & Eric Saward should never have been working together for that long. Saward has made his feelings about JNT very clear and you kinda wonder why he stuck around so long if he hated JNT's capricious mandates so much. (For what it's worth, I've never heard Andrew Cartmel complain about the kinda stuff that Saward talks about.)

Moffat on the other hand had everything, and the biggest budgets, and the best PR going. He presided over the worst ratings slide in the show's history since it was rebooted.. I think Moffat Does deserve some Criticism, who doesn't.. no body is perfect. But to act Smug, sarcastic, and condescending when a fan calls him out.. or the media.. yea.. I have no love for Wanker's like that. Self absorbed is another adjective I'd use, as he comes off in interviews.

IIRC, haven't the ratings for nearly every show been sliding down for the last decade? I figure that's more attributable to changes in TV viewing habits more than anything else. (IIRC, there was a graph that I saw a while back that was looking at the ratings for Doctor Who vs. other long running shows that had been on during the same period like Coronation Street, EastEnders, Emmerdale, etc. It showed that the ratings had gone down for all of the shows and Doctor Who had actually gone down less than most of the others, with the exception of New Tricks.) And while they may be going down in the U.K., it seems like every year I hear about the show breaking yet another ratings record on BBC America.

And I've often read interviews with Moffat where he comes across as quite self-effacing. There was one where they asked him what he thought his greatest episode was and his response was something like, "I'd be pleased to think that I've ever written anything good, let alone great."

Moffat may in reality think that some of his episodes may have been genuine misfires but I'd hardly expect him to admit it while he's in the midst of running the show. Talk to him in a decade and maybe we'll get a more frank, clinical assessment of his tenure. For now, I would expect him to think that everything that he's written is good, otherwise why write it?

Moffat's season arcs were very obvious right from the start, there was zero subtlety with the camera zooming in on a crack at the end of series five episodes for example, there was the laughable attempt at creating tension with the doctor being killed "for real" in series six, there was Clara who didn't start as a character but as a mystery to be solved and then became a character I despised.

The crack was never meant to be subtle but I thought it was an effective tease. And Moffat at least generally incorporated his arcs into his seasons more than RTD did. RTD's seasons weren't really "arcs" but more just season long easter eggs that wouldn't be explained until the finale, like "Bad Wolf" in Season 1 or the references to disappearing planets & bees in Season 4.

While your mileage may vary, I LOVED the shocker of killing the Doctor at the beginning of "The Impossible Astronaut." While I knew in the back of my mind that they couldn't ever actually kill the Doctor because they need to keep milking the cash cow, I was flabbergasted for the entire season as to how they would actually get out of it. It completely worked for me. The resolution left me flat, but the set-up was incredible and is still one of my biggest jaw-droppers in the entirety of the franchise.

And I liked Clara. I wasn't crazy about her in Season 7 but I thought she was a lot of fun the way she tried to keep the Doctor in-line in Seasons 8 & 9.

(like when super important screwed up best friend Melody was introduced five minutes before she regenerated into River ... why not introduce Melody earlier if that's the plan?)

Admittedly, it would have been nice for them to plant a brief set-up for Mels in the prologue of "The Impossible Astronaut." But for what it was, I thought the flashbacks in "Let's Kill Hitler" did a great job of setting up the character and I was completely surprised when she turned out to be River.

I came up with the theory about Amy, Rory, and River scamming the Doctor pretty much within fifteen minutes of watching "Time of the Angels," because I was trying to make sense out of what I'd just seen. The Doctor's clinginess was a recurring issue throughout Season 7A, and it was obvious that he couldn't let them go unless he absolutely had to, especially since he then goes and sulks on a cloud for years upon years. Everything about their loss felt very "artificial" and maybe that's what it would take to convince the Doctor that they were lost to him.

As has been mentioned, that's not confined to Moffat's Doctors & companions. The departures of Rose & Donna were way over the top too.

For all of Moffat's faults, and I'll admit he had his fair share (but I don't necessarily agree with the number or the extremeness), he did give me my third favorite Doctor (Eleventh) and two of my favorite companions ever (Amy and Rory). His tenure produced some of the best individual stories ever (at least since the show returned) such as "The Doctor's Wife," "The God Complex," "The Girl Who Waited," "Vincent and the Doctor," "A Christmas Carol," and "Last Christmas" (among many others and your mileage may vary).

Certainly a solid list. I don't know that I would necessarily call "A Christmas Carol" & "Last Christmas" great episodes but they were at least a solid improvement over the usual tepid Christmas fare. "The Husbands of River Song," now that's a great Christmas special. And there have been many other excellent episodes provided during Moffat's run, like "The Eleventh Hour," "Amy's Choice," "The Lodger," "The Day of the Doctor," "Listen," "The Caretaker," "Flatline," "Heaven Sent," "World Enough & Time," and "The Doctor Falls." And some others that may not be game changers but are, IMO, perfect executions of the Doctor Who formula, like "The Vampires of Venice," "Mummy on the Orient Express," "Under the Lake," & "Before the Flood."

Well he's not alone with that, and letting go of companions was as much a chore for RTD as Moffat, and once you get into the realm of people wanting to travel with the Doctor forever you're stuck with how to handle that when the actor wants to leave or the character's run his/her course. So Rose had to be separated from the Doctor by being trapped in another universe she could never, EVER, escape (until she did) Donna had to undergo a mind wipe, Amy and Rory had to be trapped in the past, Clara had to die/be reborn/become immortal/never see the Doctor again, Bill became a Cyberman and then a crazy alien water thing...really the only two modern companions whose departures felt like classic departures were Nardole (very Nyssa) and (ironically given she's perhaps my least favorite character) Martha, and even Martha had to come back several times.

I was fine with them bringing Martha back because they'd already established that she could easily come back because she didn't have some kind of cataclysmic departure. She just moved on. Personally, I wish they'd done that with Clara by keeping her rather low-key exit at the end of "Death in Heaven." (I don't get all the love for her "Last Christmas" almost-departure.)

As for Amy & Rory, I struggle a lot with their later episodes because, if I'd been Rory, "The Girl Who Waited" would have been the definitive breaking point for me. It was such a near-miss for Amy that so easily could have gone the other way. I would have put my foot down and said, "That's it! Home! Now!"

As for Bill's resurrection, I can't really fault it because her becoming a Cyberman was so traumatic for me as an audience member that I'm just glad she's OK. (I didn't really feel like there was all that much chemistry between her & the puddle girl though.)

I'd like to see more companions who travel with the Doctor almost by accident (Tegan, Ian and Barb) or because they have nowhere else to go (Nyssa, Turlough) and it'd be nice if just sometimes people had had enough. Tegan's exit is still phenomenal, and it's surprising more companions don't effectively get PTSD. Yes they see wonders, but a whole lot of warzones too!

I liked Tegan's exit, although I wish that there had been a bit more build-up to it in the story. Still, that was pretty par for the course for the classic series. Dodo & Sarah Jane both had pretty sudden exits. And the departures of Leela & Mel were just outright bizarre!
[/FONT]
 
^ So, I had the opportunity to ask Cartmel about his experiences with JNT. This was in a very small group setting. Cartmel said that he and JNT got along fine. That it took understanding the give and take that was required. He knew what he had to give JNT in order to get what he wanted. It was often offering small things too, and Cartmel would get wide latitude on everything else. I think understanding how to navigate that is what made the difference. As an aside, I found Cartmel to be such a refreshingly nice, kind person. Very thoughtful and articulate.
 
Prior to becoming showrunner, Moffat wrote some great episodes for the series (The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances, Blink, Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead). Does anyone think he could (or would want to) return to write an episode or two in the future for a new Doctor, or is he done like RTD?
 
Well he's not alone with that, and letting go of companions was as much a chore for RTD as Moffat, and once you get into the realm of people wanting to travel with the Doctor forever you're stuck with how to handle that when the actor wants to leave or the character's run his/her course. So Rose had to be separated from the Doctor by being trapped in another universe she could never, EVER, escape (until she did) Donna had to undergo a mind wipe, Amy and Rory had to be trapped in the past, Clara had to die/be reborn/become immortal/never see the Doctor again, Bill became a Cyberman and then a crazy alien water thing...really the only two modern companions whose departures felt like classic departures were Nardole (very Nyssa) and (ironically given she's perhaps my least favourite character) Martha, and even Martha had to come back several times. Note I'm kinda ignoring Jack and River here, but realistically we did see both their exits. The Face of Boe and Professor River Song both died.

On one level I get it, the Doctor has full control of his Tardis and back in the day he was somewhat adept at abandoning people and never, ever seeing them again, but the modern show's gone too far the other way. Everyone always wants to travel with the Doctor and he can always get them home again and pop round for tea long after they've left.

There must be a middle ground.

I'd like to see more companions who travel with the Doctor almost by accident (Tegan, Ian and Barb) or because they have nowhere else to go (Nyssa, Turlough) and it'd be nice if just sometimes people had had enough. Tegan's exit is still phenomenal, and it's surprising more companions don't effectively get PTSD. Yes they see wonders, but a whole lot of warzones too!

I still liken travelling with the Doctor as being akin to backpacking on your gap year. It's fun and adventurous, and sure some people turn it into a life, but most people get tired of sleeping in tents, tired of the lack of stability, and they want to go home get a job raise a family etc.

That actually sounds good again. Accidentally ends up in the TARDIS, on the run and no real life..the Ian and Barbara trope..that's Actually kinda cool. Loved when they invented the randomizer. That was a good series arc to milk, and refreshed Bakers series with a new story direction that was refreshing and exciting. Unpredictable. I can see the title now..

Doctor who.."The Accidental Tourist".

Haha. Brilliant!
 
Prior to becoming showrunner, Moffat wrote some great episodes for the series (The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances, Blink, Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead). Does anyone think he could (or would want to) return to write an episode or two in the future for a new Doctor, or is he done like RTD?
It'd expect he'll be done with the show for some years to come. He's burned out and wanted to leave the show a couple of years ago but BBC twisted his arm. Maybe someday he'll come back and write another episode (maybe Davies, too), but it won't be anytime soon.
 
Yeah, I seem to recall Moffat has said that Twice Upon a Time will be his last Doctor Who script. Whether him or RTD ever come back remains to be seen, but if they do it won't be for a long while. I'm thinking a decade or so at least. Hell, Moffat has more or less devoted an entire decade to Doctor Who, given he began writing the script to The Eleventh Hour in January 2008.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top