What an odd thing to say.
It wasn’t my idea. Talk to CBS.
What an odd thing to say.
The only reason we have phasers is some one told Gene "lasers can't do that" and he actually listened. Other than the name they functioned the same for the needs of the show. (I.e. Ray gun)One day they'll make a Trek that pulls a Halloween or Terminator, and picks up after one of the earlier movies deliberately ignoring everything that comes after. Heads will explode.
And does anyone remember "Balance of Terror", when phasers were photon torpedoes and Kirk had to use shipboard communications to order them fired from the bridge, to someone below decks who had to press a special button? Which never happened again?
Or when Pike's crew used hand lasers? And a massive laser cannon because phasers weren't thought of until the series proper?
Roddenberry had the idea first.It wasn’t my idea. Talk to CBS.
Roddenberry had the idea first.
This is strangely vindictive.Roddenberry's dead. CBS is in charge now. And CBS didn't need to follow in Roddenberry's footsteps. They chose to.
This is strangely vindictive.
I'd be happy to talk to CBS. I have no problem with them choosing to follow with what Roddenberry had done prior. Nothing is wrong with my eyes, as you so colorfully claim. It is simply another artistic interpretation.
Saying that CBS is saying that you can no longer trust your eyes. If I misread, I apologize but it comes across as very hostile and vindictive towards CBS.Vindictive? Not sure where you're getting this from. I'm just pointing out that CBS has no intention of making DSC look like TOS. I never said that was a bad thing. I just said that CBS chose to make a 'visual reboot' of TOS, so I can no longer trust my eyes that what I see in TOS is accurate, because someone else is currently in charge of this universe and is dictating what I see irrespective of what my eyes show me. How is that being vindictive?
Saying that CBS is saying that you can no longer trust your eyes. If I misread, I apologize but it comes across as very hostile and vindictive towards CBS.
And I can watch TOS and DSC side by side with no issue.
Didn't say you were.Well, I can't be responsible for your judgments.
That's fair.Yeah, so can I. Never said I couldn't. It's the 'DSC is a prequel to TOS' thing that I don't agree with. And as I keep saying ad nauseum, I just treat DSC as a separate thing from TOS. When I do that, I like DSC just fine.
I don't understand what CBS has do with any of this but I think I'll just move on.
Probably not. Personally in the regards of PIC, I don't much care whether it is in continuity with DIS or not, it really doesn't have any impact. I merely care about it maintaining decent continuity with TNG and the associated movies.Is the PIC board really the place to have the same tired old discussions about the validity of DSC?
just asking for a friend
And I can watch TOS and DSC side by side with no issue.
^^^There weren't many intentional changes. (Not counting ENT though, that's when the continuity started to fall apart.)
No it didn't. Overall it was pretty plausible development of technology and society over a century.^^^
Um, try TNG <-- That show retconned the hell out of Kirk's era from the start.
^^^
Um, try TNG <-- That show retconned the hell out of Kirk's era from the start.
^ Liked for HoW reference.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.