Some things definitely deserve to be updated with the times. No doubt about that. But that doesn’t explain the majority of the changes in Discovery, and you’re lying to yourself if you think it does. Similarly, just because TNG had unnecessary changes doesn’t make Discovery’s less unnecessary. That is all. The two tired arguments from Discovery apologists:
1) Oh, I guess you want crappy plastic models, lol!
2) Oh, I guess you want them to be as consistent with the Klingons as they were between TOS and TUC, lol!
Come on. No one is saying either of those things. But there is an order of magnitude difference in S1 of Discovery. And that’s exactly why they tried so hard to undo it all in S2. We all get it. Even the producers get it. Only Discovery apologists don’t.
Well, IDK - as a TOS fan first and foremost (watched first run since 1969 - third season; caught the rest in syndication over the years) - at least the current STD arguments you site are better than the TNG apologists were in 1987, which consisted of:
"It ain't 1966 anymore, man."
Believe me, I get it - there's a lot of changes from YOUR era of Trek in this new era of Trek you hate and think are absolutely unneeded and make no sense...
To you I say:
Hey WELCOME to STAR TREK fandom...we've been through this with EVEY new incarnation from TAS to the first TOS feature films (My GOD! TWO Turbolifts on the 1701 in ST:TMP!!! WTF!!! - Not my Trek!!! <- And no not kidding, many were upset about stuff like that back in the day..)
It's the way it is...get used to it.
Last edited: