PRe concIEVed nOTioNs aRE poINtLEss iN a vISUallY rEBOoted sHoW
I've reached a point where none of that matters to me now. They can say the entire creative team behind Discovery is made up of Devil-Worshiping Anti-Christs or Retcon-Worshiping Anti-Genes and I wouldn't care.
You sure are putting a visible amount of effort into something you claim not to care about.
I mean...
I honestly don't know why people have problems with square nacelles. The TMP refit era nacelles weren't exactly round either.![]()
You sure are putting a visible amount of effort into something you claim not to care about.
Well, so is the Galaxy class.It's not that they're square or rectangular in shape. It's that so many of the ones in DSC are, well, kinda ugly. Or really ugly.
Well, so is the Galaxy class.
Well, beauty is in the eye of the beholderI actually really love the long, lean nacelles of the Crossfield-class. It (and some of the other design choices) gives the design a distinctive look that was needed for a new Star Trek hero ship.
Well, beauty is in the eye of the beholder![]()
The D and the C were not a favorite of mine, but I can appreciate some facets. The Defiant I agree is ugly on purpose but I always liked the Intrepid design. Also, absolutely love Kelvin Enterprise.Actually, most of Star Trek's hero ships are beautiful designs to me. The only exceptions are the Voyager and the Defiant...and I give the latter a pass because it was not meant to be a sexy design.
But all the versions of the Enterprise (NX through E) have their own special beauty...as does the Discovery.
Im not a fan of the Kelvinverse Enterprise, but I certainly don't dislike it either. I think the only design that really doesn't sit with me is the Voyager.
Can't believe he would listen to the producer's request. He shouldAlso according to him, the big design difference between the -D and -E came as a request from the producers.
Everyone knows that productions don't listen to technical advisers.Can't believe he would listen to the producer's request. He should
be following what Starfleet engineers say!
According to Eaves, the flatness of Voyager is why he made the Enterprise-E flat.
Also according to him, the big design difference between the -D and -E came as a request from the producers.
Well, so is the Galaxy class.
HOLD UP ONE MINUTE. My Making of First Contact book says the similarities between Voyager and the E-E were entirely fluke, and Eaves hadn't even seen Voyager.According to Eaves, the flatness of Voyager is why he made the Enterprise-E flat.
I misread a line on memory-alphaHOLD UP ONE MINUTE. My Making of First Contact book says the similarities between Voyager and the E-E were entirely fluke, and Eaves hadn't even seen Voyager.
HaVE wE bEEn LIed tO???
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.