• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Stargate Universe SPOILERS!!

Re: Stargate Universe Good or BAD?

The idea of the Ancient ship that's accessible through the ninth chevron is pretty good, but I don't see how you can get a TV show out of it. The story of this Ancient ship should be used as an SG-1 DVD movie.
 
Re: Stargate Universe Good or BAD?

The Wormhole said:
The idea of the Ancient ship that's accessible through the ninth chevron is pretty good, but I don't see how you can get a TV show out of it. The story of this Ancient ship should be used as an SG-1 DVD movie.

That's what it was supposed to me. And I have been thinking about it and that's what they should do. They should make a DVD movie, and it works well then they can make it into a show.

And the problem with the Stargate: Universe idea is more of a USA thing. I think it would make a great show over 1-3 seasons, with a plan each season, and then end it. The british do things correctly and never over do it, and have shows end when the creators wants (Like Life on Mars). And if it is a super hit, which I doubt, they can expand on it more in another series.
 
Re: Stargate Universe Good or BAD?

bigdaddy said:
Umm... they why do even the worst episodes of Atlantis get the majority of the people voting here to love it?

Umm... because a Star Trek BBS isn't a random cross-section of television viewers or even a random of SciFi Channel viewers. This is a forum devoted to Stargate. People who've tuned out years ago aren't posting here. The producers can't afford to make a series that won't bring in new viewers. This happened to Trek -- each subsequent series didn't even keep all the viewers who were watching the previous series... That's a losing formula.
 
Or maybe, Stargate: Deep Space Nine. It looks like they'd be able to come and go from this distant, untamed galaxy at their leisure.
 
Still the viewers will be there to watch for a few reasons, they like stupid sci-fi, they want to see space ships, or because no other sci-fi show is on.

Viewers won't ever be a major issue with the Stargate name until the fans feel like it's like Star Trek and get sick of it doing the same crap every week. And it's very clear that the fans don't care.
 
The premise of this show merits a gigantic 'meh'. Maybe it's just me, but the more I learn about the Ancients, the less I care to know more. They were a bunch of wussy aliens who copped out of doing anything constructive by "ascending".

Also, this sounds more like a movie idea than an entire series. How do you develop an enemy when you're dealing with the entire Universe?

I would be far more interested if the new series would skip ahead a few hundred years in human progression and focus more on what the Stargate program accomplsished and what they end up doing. Perhaps they develop a more advanced Stargate. Perhaps they learn than "ascending" is lame as hell and decide to become more like explorers and explore the Universe. Perhaps the Tau'ri become the dominating force in the Galaxy and there become uprisings. Perhaps the humans splinter into two groups with some kind of following (perhaps similar to Ori uprising?). There are just so many cooler ideas than another Star Trek rip off.

Hell, even a show based around the Hey Day of the Goa'uld could be pretty cool.
 
That doesnt sound bad but doesnt sound good either.

Id warmed up to the idea of a ship based show, but was hoping it was going to be an exploration ship of our own making, with its own stargate.
 
Eh. I guess there's some potential here, if they can keep to their premise.

The ancients have never been to these places, so no more excuses for humans on every planet, all of which look like Canada.

On the other hand, haven't we seen enough of the ancients and their second evolution nonsense by now?

Also, maybe there's someone more in the know about this than I am, but is there any validity to that "older parts of the universe" stuff? Isn't the universe 10 billion light years away the same age as the universe here?

I know that the further away you look into the universe, the farther back in time you're seeing because of the speed of light. Are they confused with that effect?
 
Re: Stargate Universe Good or BAD?

bigdaddy said:
Turbo said:
It sounds like an interesting idea for an SG-1 or Atlantis miniseries (perhaps this ship is in the Furlings' home galaxy), but it really doesn't seem like the concept would hold up well as a full series.

It was going to be made into a movie then they changed their minds and desided to try to make it intoa show.
Where'd you see that? Not that I don't believe it, but we know that that was the case with Lost City. Two aborted movies, especially when SG-1 is making movies now?

Oh, and does anyone else think that the producers might have allowed this to slip out to gauge fan reactions?
 
Re: Stargate Universe Good or BAD?

To be honest I want a show that actually deal with a new look Earth and Galaxy, one that actually shows the public finding out about the Stargate.

To be honest I can't really see any sort of idea that could work for a 3rd show and think after Atlantis that there is no reason why the franchise can't go on a break for a few years.

If there is a 3td show then I want Conner Trinner as the lead actor.
 
Re: Stargate Universe Good or BAD?

There will be no 'break' in Stargate scheduling. Wright and Mallozi will continue to churn out rehashed plots after rehashed plots year in year out, suffocating their viewers and eventually leading to SGU getting cancelled.

A break would be ideal, but it will never happen as long as those morons are in charge.
 
Re: Stargate Universe Good or BAD?

I like SG-1 and SG-A but feel a 3rd show under the same writers is too dangerous and TREK proves this fact. A 12-18 month break is needed after SG-A ends either in S5 or S6 and then we need fresh new writers.
 
Re: Stargate Universe Good or BAD?

Regarding its origin as a film

From Gateworld:
. . . Like many of the producers ideas, Cooper said, the idea for Stargate Universe was originally conceived as a stand-alone movie. "When we originally were sitting around talking about this we were trying to come up with ideas for a Stargate feature -- not an SG-1 feature or an Atlantis feature, but a feature that would fit into the Stargate franchise that we feel we have created," Cooper said. "We were thinking, 'How do we create a third arm to the franchise that is very connective and that fans will feel is born out of the material that has come before, but at the same time is very much something that stands alone?'

"When it became clear that a third series was a more realistic possibility at this point from the studio's standpoint, we figured out how to tweak that idea and give it a little more legs than it would have had as a one-off story. We always, in the back of our minds even in coming up with that concept, felt that it could launch a third series. ... But now that idea has become the core idea for the new show."

Link: http://www.gateworld.net/news/2007/03/third_series_is_istargate_univer.shtml
 
Re: Stargate Universe Good or BAD?

"I think it's a good premise"

/shrug, i'm willing to give it a chance, it sounds neat to me

I like how we finally know how they seeded the galaxy with Stargates now!
 
Re: Stargate Universe Good or BAD?

Kpnuts said:
There will be no 'break' in Stargate scheduling. Wright and Mallozi will continue to churn out rehashed plots after rehashed plots year in year out, suffocating their viewers and eventually leading to SGU getting cancelled.

A break would be ideal, but it will never happen as long as those morons are in charge.

but it will be a great 3 years full of P90 action, witty one liners and pop culture references :lol:
 
that1guy said:
The premise of this show merits a gigantic 'meh'. Maybe it's just me, but the more I learn about the Ancients, the less I care to know more. They were a bunch of wussy aliens who copped out of doing anything constructive by "ascending".
I do agree the Ancients are wussies. At the same time I rather ascend and explore the universe than take a ship and do the same thing. But the Ancients were a bunch of wimps before they went bye-bye, but they really don't need to be in the show.

Plus because they are going so far away they can go back in time and bring the Asgard back to how they were.

And they will never set a Stargate far in the future, that's against what makes Stargate Stargate.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top