billcosby said:Yes, sadly I agree.
I wasn't serious.
billcosby said:Yes, sadly I agree.
Fair enough. Although I'd hoped that when the Clone Wars started they would have a plan to approach the 3 year gap between films with some properly thought out timelines. With that mind-numbing chronology that JD just posted it makes me suspect otherwise.
Sometimes it is most proper to tell a story out of order. Sometimes that's the best, most meaningful way to present a story to an audience. For instance, the ending of The Empire Strikes Back wouldn't be as powerful if the prequels had been made first and everyone had already known that Vader was Luke's father. That was a case where the "proper" way to tell the story was out of chronological order.
It's taken from Wookiepeida's timeline of media. It puts every movie, show, game, short story, book, comic, ect. in order.Fair enough. Although I'd hoped that when the Clone Wars started they would have a plan to approach the 3 year gap between films with some properly thought out timelines. With that mind-numbing chronology that JD just posted it makes me suspect otherwise.
Have the abduction suceed and Palpatine be replaced by Darth Sidious using the same face altering surgery used on Obi-Wan...that would throw everything for a loop. Turns out Sidious and Palpatine were two seperate people!
The outrage from fandom would be hilarious.
They'd never do that, though.
The first Star Wars film was Episode IV - very nonlinear.
There is no set end date for the series. At Fan Days in Texas last October, I was talking to Tom Kane (the voice of Yoda and others) who told me that the actors were currently recording season five, and that the writers were already working on season six. That's been stated in other interviews I've heard as well.
all the "new" stuff he knows about his role as the Chosen One that obviously wasn't part of the rationale of ROTS originally.
Sometimes it is most proper to tell a story out of order. Sometimes that's the best, most meaningful way to present a story to an audience. For instance, the ending of The Empire Strikes Back wouldn't be as powerful if the prequels had been made first and everyone had already known that Vader was Luke's father. That was a case where the "proper" way to tell the story was out of chronological order. So it's bizarre that any Star Wars fan could be so ignorant as to think that linear chronology is the only "proper" way to tell a story.
And then, Star Wars 3D is announced... and everyone super pumped to see A New Hope in 3D first were likely disappointed to hear TPM comes first. But at least we could finally draw the conclusion: this is chronological Lucas' choice of viewing order.
One major reason I'm irritated by all of this is because when The Clone Wars started I tried to pay attention to what sort of large scale movements were being made in the war (the narrator's open often includes this information) to try and picture how the galactic skirmish of the Clone Wars played out. I felt the series (like most on television) begins and implies an orderly progression.
And when the entire Clone Wars series is over and we can rewatch it from the start, is it in airing order or the timeline order?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.