Because the scale may be off.
It will bug me forever.So? Is that going to effect the plot? The characters? The acting? The directing? It's just scale of a non-excisting object. I'll get over it.
But I already sounded the alarm! There's no backing out now, the scale police will be on their way!So? Is that going to effect the plot? The characters? The acting? The directing? It's just scale of a non-excisting object. I'll get over it.
Mon Mothma's rope chains are to thick when compared to ROTJ
Really, you're nit picking that?Mon Mothma's rope chains are to thick when compared to ROTJ
Really, you're nit picking that?
If I found the difference they should have found it.
For me Han Solo is Harrison Ford and vice versa. Using the Star Trek reboots as an example; they're fine and they're a good cast but, to me at least, they won't ever be the original characters. So whoever they cast as Han Solo will only ever be doing an impression of him. Equally now, I can't imagine any other actor playing Tony Stark although I'm sure they'll find another Iron Man of some description. Ewen McGregor as Obi Wan Kenobi seemed to work because of the massive age gap between him and Guinness. McGregors performance could conceivably become the perfomance Guinness put in, for example. But Ford was in his thirties so unless they're doing him really young all I'll see is someone who won't grow into Han Solo.We had Pre-OT Han Solo novels in the old EU, why not the movies?
I'm still not convinced we need a Han Solo origins movie, nor any of the other suggested ideas so far.
Tuskin38 said:Really, you're nit picking that?
Reverend said:I suspect that had more to do with a lack of continuity oversight. Or rather a much less attentive one than there is now (at least until things get complicated again.)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.