Yeah. So who is playing him?The extended Ahsoka trailer shows Sabine using Ezra’s lightsaber, and Thrawn’s face
Yeah. So who is playing him?The extended Ahsoka trailer shows Sabine using Ezra’s lightsaber, and Thrawn’s face
Lars.Yeah. So who is playing him?
They're showing the panel nowThe Creature Cantina just started on the livestream. Guess that means we're not getting the Clone Wars panel, alas.
It's simple: if this movie does well, Disney will want to make more, and if she isn't contracted for more, she'd be able to hold up said sequels for a higher salary. Ergo, it's only logical for Disney to lock her in to more than one movie up front, especially since the first movie will serve as its own advertisement for the potential others. Bringing her back at all is an investment, and one they'll want to capitalize on.
Hugh Jackman as Wolverine is a big enough star to secure a one-movie returns to his role. But Ridley? Nah.
I'm wondering if Joonas Suotamo might be playing Buryyaga Agaburry, I can't imagine there were that many Wookie Jedi running around so close to when Phases 1 & 3 of The High Republic take place.Well this is interesting; word out of the High Republic panel is that Vernestra Rwoh will be in 'The Acolyte'. I'm guessing that's Rebecca Henderson's character which she already cryptically (and weirdly specifically) described as a "Mirialan elder Jedi Master". Since 'The Acolyte' takes place a century after Phase I, that seems to track.
Kinda wild that the youngest Jedi from one era shows up as among the eldest in another.
If they end up calling it "Episode X" we'll expect an XI and XII...As you said, she's definitely contracted for more. But that's just SOP, doesn't mean there will actually be another movie or even plans for one. But it's just how you do business, you put those clauses in precisely for the reasons you delineated.
No, they were very definite that he wasn't Buryyaga, but a new character called Kelnacca. Keep in mind; the Acolyte takes place about a century after the last time we saw Buryyaga, and likewise about a century before the Clone Wars when Gungi was a padawan. I think three Jedi Wookiees spread across as many centuries still counts as "rare" in an organization that hovered around 10,000 strong.I'm wondering if Joonas Suotamo might be playing Buryyaga Agaburry, I can't imagine there were that many Wookie Jedi running around so close to when Phases 1 & 3 of The High Republic take place.
OK, the story I saw just said he was playing a Wookiee Jedi, they didn't say anything about them revealing his name.No, they were very definite that he wasn't Buryyaga, but a new character called Kelnacca. Keep in mind; the Acolyte takes place about a century after the last time we saw Buryyaga, and likewise about a century before the Clone Wars when Gungi was a padawan. I think three Jedi Wookiees spread across as many centuries still counts as "rare" in an organization that hovered around 10,000 strong.
Which disproves your point. Also, you forgot that Luke not just appeared on screen in Rebels but also that "Twin Suns" was about Luke.It occurs to me there may be a kind of grand irony at play here: when Filoni was starting out, and even getting into the Rebels timeline, he was doubtless barred from doing series/stories about Luke, Leia, and Han because those characters were too important for mere animation. (Yes, I know that there's a Rebels episode featuring Leia.)
That and the Leia episode were two out of 75. This is my "not impressed" face.Also, you forgot that Luke not just appeared on screen in Rebels but also that "Twin Suns" was about Luke.
Nope.Which disproves your point.
You're proceeding from a false assumption. There's been absolutely no indication that they were "barred" from using any particular characters. Indeed, had they pitched a Luke, Leia & Han show set immediately after ANH or RotJ, Disney would likely have been all for it! All they really cared about is to have something on DisneyXD to sell toys and sticker books.It occurs to me there may be a kind of grand irony at play here: when Filoni was starting out, and even getting into the Rebels timeline, he was doubtless barred from doing series/stories about Luke, Leia, and Han because those characters were too important for mere animation
No idea if this rumor is true but supposedly disney pushed the newer characters because of some merchandising deal George had with the original characters meaning disney couldn't maximize the profit without introducing new characters.To me no one really knew how to use the OT crew after the OT. It's just too neat a wrap up.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.