I thought the movies are already done with her? IIRC, Gwendoline Christie is not listed among the cast for Episode IX.Hopefully post episode IX the movies will be completely done with her
I thought the movies are already done with her? IIRC, Gwendoline Christie is not listed among the cast for Episode IX.Hopefully post episode IX the movies will be completely done with her
I thought the movies are already done with her? IIRC, Gwendoline Christie is not listed among the cast for Episode IX.
First, before getting into my responses to other posts, I want to say that I've started Phasma. I looked up a bit about it, and I'm really disappointed in all the comparisons to Mad Max, and how Phasma isn't even really a character in the book. Hopefully post episode IX the movies will be completely done with her and we can get an actual backstory and character for her. As for this book, Ill give it a chance, but I don't know if I'll get through it knowing what I now know about it.
Eh, I don't really need anything more with the parents. They got the perfect amount of screen time in the movie. Anything more would be like reading a book focused on Luke's Uncle Own and Aunt Beru, a kind of pointless story about characters I find uninteresting.
I found the "blindly loyal to the point of being psychotic" Empire types in that book to be boring. I'm fine with really evil villains in Star Wars, but they have to have more to them then "the Empire is basically my religion". No Imperial should be that obsessively loyal to the Empire, to the point where they have no real character. Imperials don't have to waver in their loyalty or anything, but they need something else. I just really hated everyone in that book. I'd honestly call it the second worst canon book I tried but couldn't finish, after Lost Stars.
That is the perfect way to describe what I think of Leia. She's a good character, but I don't need a lot of stories with her as the focus. As for the book, even outside of it being focused on Leia, honestly I tolerate Claudia Gray at the best of times. I'll at least try any general audience SW book she does, but I couldn't be paid to look at one of her YA books again.
I thought the movies are already done with her? IIRC, Gwendoline Christie is not listed among the cast for Episode IX.
I think the book gets better by the end. There actually is a reason why in the book we always see Phasma through the eyes of other characters, never from her perspective (like Sherlock Holmes or Grand Admiral Thrawn in other books). I think it's worth it, if nothing else for Captain Cardinal's story.
I strongly recommend that you give the book another chance; I read through the whole thing and I can assure you that the characters are not the cardboard cut outs they've come across to you as. In fact, IMHO, they're some of the most interesting antagonist characters we've gotten. I will concede that I don't know were you stopped reading and, at the end of the day, you've got to do you, but I think that it would be worth it to give it another shot.
It takes all types, doesn't it? Funny thing for me is that while I don't "need" the Leia books, I tend to find that I like them an awful lot when I do read them. Weird, huh?
I like the new Thrawn books, but him not being the focus is the weakest part (well, technically making half of Thrawn 2 a book about freaking Padme was the weakest part, but overall not focusing on Thrawn is the biggest recurring flaw with the new Thrawn books).
As for generic red guy, I've read a lot of Star Wars stuff over the years, and he really isn't impressive. If I want to read about a generic SW thug but in red armor, I'd read the old Crimson Empire comics![]()
Actually, I think one of the new canon books has already had a more interesting red armored character, since I think a former Imperial Guard was in one of the books (Aftermath, maybe?).
Eh, I don't think so. I HATED the book. Rarely have I seen such badly written Imperial characters, and when it comes to terrible New Canon SW books at least Lost Stars had the excuse of being a generic YA romance book to explain why it was so bad. Inferno Squad was supposedly a general audience SW book, but it reads like an author who has never seen any of the films was contracted to write it. I honestly can't believe it was written by the same woman who wrote Dark Disciple, to me Inferno Squad feels like a first novel from someone who doesn't like SW. So, yeah, unless someone wants to pay me a lot of money for my time, I won't be looking at that book again. I'd almost rather try to read Lost Stars again. Almost.
For me, I thought Bloodlines was just ok. Leia is great as a side character, or part of an ensemble cast, but I don't need solo (pun not intended) stories with her.
Never read those comics, but I will say that that "generic red guy" gets some really good character work in the Phasma novel. You do need to read through it to get it, of course.
That's not ringing any bells. The Aftermath trilogy did have a former Imperial loyalty officer in the cast (and he was a very interesting character).
Your call, but you are loosing out big time and I can assure you that whatever you saw in the book's beginning is not how the story unfolds when you get to the end of it. (Heck, I'm kinda doubting that we're even talking about the same book here.)
I'm at his introduction, but he doesn't have much. He doesn't like Phasma, and thats about it. Not exactly an interesting villain, although still 1000 times better then the boring Resistance spy he's interrogating.
You're right. I guess I mixed him up with being part of the Royal Guard somehow.
I'm talking about the book where a female imperial pilot, daughter of a group of 1 dimensional imperial fanatics, survives the battle of Yavin and does evil stuff, all while everyone is acting so obsessive and nuts with the Empire worship that Palpatine would probably have told them to tone it down.
That's just my opinion. But, its one i'm firm on.
As it is, to me its easily the worst SW book that isn't a YA romance novel.
Who said he was the villain?
In any event, the book does peel back layers on this guy. Not liking Phasma is just one element.
That's not who the characters are. The book does have a slow start, but it picks up and subverts everything you ever thought going into it. In fact, if you don't like the idea of flat, Empire-worshiping villains, this is exactly the book for you. (Kinda funny, both this book and Lost Stars deal with the idea of shades of gray in the Empire, but you weren't fond of either of them, despite it apparently being that don't like things all black and white. There's some irony there.)
Worse then Crystal Star, Plant of Twilight, and the Fate of the Jedi stuff?
If you can get past the icky-cooties romance elements of Lost Stars, there is a lot of great world building for what was going on before, during, and after the OT.As for Lost Stars, it doesn't deal in anything except being the Star Wars version of Twilight minus the vampires and mixed with some Romeo & Juliet.
If you can get past the icky-cooties romance elements of Lost Stars, there is a lot of great world building for what was going on before, during, and after the OT.
I was shocked to find out that both Keira Knightly and Rose Byrne were in the Prequel Trilogy.Just got done reading 'Queen's Shadow' and it was very good. As someone who could never keep the various handmaiden's straight and is surprised every time I look it up and realise just how many outfits Portman wore in those movies (I swear, it's almost a new one for every scene for the most part!) it was nice to have it contextualised into a narrative so I now have a better grasp of it all.
My only negative is the lack of a central plot. While the backbone of it is absolutely Padme coming to grips with the transition from Queen to Senator, the narrative seems to flit hither and thither, never really settling on anything and the way the book ends, most of the subplots are left unresolved or dead ended. I guess part of that is unavoidable given that a lot of it is just foreshadowing other stories and relationships we've already seen play out in the movies and TCW, but still. I guess it would feel like a more natural flow if it lead straight into the opening of AotC, but it just stops dead about 5 years between TPM & AorC before jumping ahead to Padmé's funeral epilogue.
I guess the main take away is that it left me wanting more and I'd be all for a followup book based solely around Sabé post RotS. Indeed, I'll double down on what I said before about getting Keira Knightly back. I could easily see her having a role in a number of upcoming projects: The Cassian series, the supposed young Leia show, whatever they're doing (if anything) with Kenobi in exile and I'd even say the the young Han/Qi'ra stuff too if they plan on continuing that thread.
The book also left me wanting to learn more about the Naboo and their history. Most especially why such and idyllic, seemingly naive culture managed to get where they were. Given the implications of how their ancestors displaced the native Gungans and what is implied by them employing such borderline paranoid use of theatre and subterfuge in their security, from decoys, to weaponized jewellery. This to me speaks of a history that's a bit more blood soaked than they'd like to admit.
I was shocked to find out that both Keira Knightly and Rose Byrne were in the Prequel Trilogy.Just got done reading 'Queen's Shadow' and it was very good. As someone who could never keep the various handmaiden's straight and is surprised every time I look it up and realise just how many outfits Portman wore in those movies (I swear, it's almost a new one for every scene for the most part!) it was nice to have it contextualised into a narrative so I now have a better grasp of it all.
My only negative is the lack of a central plot. While the backbone of it is absolutely Padme coming to grips with the transition from Queen to Senator, the narrative seems to flit hither and thither, never really settling on anything and the way the book ends, most of the subplots are left unresolved or dead ended. I guess part of that is unavoidable given that a lot of it is just foreshadowing other stories and relationships we've already seen play out in the movies and TCW, but still. I guess it would feel like a more natural flow if it lead straight into the opening of AotC, but it just stops dead about 5 years between TPM & AorC before jumping ahead to Padmé's funeral epilogue.
I guess the main take away is that it left me wanting more and I'd be all for a followup book based solely around Sabé post RotS. Indeed, I'll double down on what I said before about getting Keira Knightly back. I could easily see her having a role in a number of upcoming projects: The Cassian series, the supposed young Leia show, whatever they're doing (if anything) with Kenobi in exile and I'd even say the the young Han/Qi'ra stuff too if they plan on continuing that thread.
The book also left me wanting to learn more about the Naboo and their history. Most especially why such and idyllic, seemingly naive culture managed to get where they were. Given the implications of how their ancestors displaced the native Gungans and what is implied by them employing such borderline paranoid use of theatre and subterfuge in their security, from decoys, to weaponized jewellery. This to me speaks of a history that's a bit more blood soaked than they'd like to admit.
Does Leia, Princess of Alderaan deal with Breha Organa much? I've been curious about her for a while. We've gotten tons of stuff about Bail over the years, but we've never really seen much of Breha other than her quick appearance at the end of Revenge of The Sith.
Yeah, Lost Stars is nothing like Twilight. At all.Lost Stars is a YA romance in the vein of Twilight is its biggest issue.
I was aware Keira Knightley was in TPM for a while. Probably since her popularity skyrocketed after Pirates of the Caribbean. It was only in recent years I learned Rose Byrne was in AOTC. In fact, it might have been back in 2015 when I was doing a rewatch just prior to TFA's release.I was shocked to find out that both Keira Knightly and Rose Byrne were in the Prequel Trilogy.
Yeah, Lost Stars is nothing like Twilight. At all.
Well, I'm still going through it, slowly. The resistance spy is just starting the (first?) Phasma story. All we know about the guy in Red is that he's a bad guy, he hates Phasma, and he's incompetent when it comes to torture.
I'm fine with bad guys with intense loyalty to the Empire, but the people still have to have character. Tarkin was loyal to the Empire, but he didn't worship Vader or Palpatine. The imperial pilot's Dad in that book would probably literally sacrifice (by that I mean a dagger and blood style sacrifice) his daughter if Palpatine so much as hinted he wanted him to do it, and the daughter would probably jump at the opportunity to be sacrificed.
Its fine to have side characters like that, but you can't focus a story on such a one dimensional character. As for Lost Stars, it doesn't deal in anything except being the Star Wars version of Twilight minus the vampires and mixed with some Romeo & Juliet.
But anyway, I don't want to argue. People don't always like the same things. There are definitely SW books I like and even love that other people don't care for, which is fine.
I liked Fate of the Jedi well enough, it was certainly better then the Dark nest trilogy or the non-Karen Traviss books in the Legacy of the Force series.
Planet of Twilight was fine, a middle of the road book, and The Crystal Star was decent from what I remember, although I haven't read it in years.
Never read Dark Nest, but I think Legacy was better then Fate.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.