• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek: Starships Model/Magazine Subscription

Bernd posted his Ex Astris Scientia database entry on Klingon ships of DSC:
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/schematics/discovery_klingon.htm

I always thought that STO’s idea of Feds, KDF and Romulan Republic building a starship class type (e.g. pilot escorts) and then having 3 individual named classes rolled out for the type is a bit...wasteful? Impractical?

But with some of the DSC Klingon ships forming design lineages/classes, that’s either now having a canon precedent. Or, it’s like in the Kelvin timeline, where the Connie got upgraded noticeably and several times within a few years (original, 2259/60 refit, 2263 refit, A-type).
 
I’m not really sure why the Nerada needs to be off the table when Hot Wheels did a reasonable one. Is it that much harder than the Romulan drone which had numerous bits sticking off of it? (Although now I’m wondering if it’s off the table because it’s too expensive too make because of the labor of gluing a zillion spikes to it.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: MFB
I always thought that STO’s idea of Feds, KDF and Romulan Republic building a starship class type (e.g. pilot escorts) and then having 3 individual named classes rolled out for the type is a bit...wasteful? Impractical?

But with some of the DSC Klingon ships forming design lineages/classes, that’s either now having a canon precedent. Or, it’s like in the Kelvin timeline, where the Connie got upgraded noticeably and several times within a few years (original, 2259/60 refit, 2263 refit, A-type).
I’ve only watched the first episode of DIS, however, since my understanding from that episode was the Klingon houses weren’t yet united, so maybe that’s a reason why there are multiple classes per ship type.

Also, I think we are supposed to pretend the 2263 changes are part of a single post Info Darkness refit.
i'm just as baffled by the choices made for discovery's starships as everyone else, but bernd's closed-mindedness is hilarious. "discovery reboot"? such shade.
He’s been bent out of shape since ST2009, and really needs to tell himself it’s just a show and to relax.
 
interesting read, had no idea the veqlargh (my favorite discovery klingon design) was just one of a few ships with very similar configurations.
i'm just as baffled by the choices made for discovery's starships as everyone else, but bernd's closed-mindedness is hilarious. "discovery reboot"? such shade.
Since it's got the same ships (D-7, Bop etc) but depicted with very different designs, a site like EAS would need something to differentiate DSC from Berman-era Trek.

I'd have gone with "Discoverse"
 
  • Like
Reactions: pst
you may think that. and i may think that. but the producers don't agree, so it's not.
The art department thinks it is, and the producers are signing off on them deliberately contradicting everything from Klingon anatomy to Pike's Enterprise, so I'm thinking it's more a case of them just saying whatever they think will get them the most subscriptions on the belief their fanbase will swallow anything with "prime universe" slapped on it.

And I say that as a fan of the show, albeit one who watches it as a Gotham/Smallville/Batman Begins-style reboot-prequel.
 
I received an email about my Discovery subscription. Basically the same information as the one received by UK subscribers with the exception of the restart date. It gives a date of June 16th, I think the UK was June 12th.
 
It's cool that they are doing the un-Borgified version of the Arctic One, although on that preview pic it looks kinda bland.

The Vulcan Survey Ship is also a nice addition to the growing Vulcan fleet. I wonder why they haven't done the Vulcan shuttle from TMP yet, though.
 
It's not like he doesn't have a point. A lot of people find it difficult to reconcile Discovery with what's come before.
no totally and i'm one of them.

he also does this with every new incarnation of the franchise: he considered enterprise inconsistent with the franchise for being too advanced before coming to accept it. still calls the kelvin timeline "abramsverse" and refused to acknowledge its prime timeline elements as canonical (way before simon pegg's comments about it being a wholly new universe in 2016). and now he has deemed discovery a reboot, despite the stated intention of the producers.

i think a website dedicated to the minutiae and continuity of starship design should try to account for new designs, not immediately dismiss them. even if they're ugly. which they are.

i love his site, read and reread his articles frequently. he's just an example of the kind of intransigence and resistance to change i hate in certain fandoms.

but hey, expecting the klingon warbird any day now.
giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top