these look bad:
![]()
And, thankfully, that's what you can easily do with the blu-ray version of TOS-R.I love the remastered image quality. But the space-shots are a big part of a space opera for me. And everytime the cartoon-y models are visibly, I want to go back to the low-resolution original.
And, thankfully, that's what you can easily do with the blu-ray version of TOS-R.![]()
They did. And they're on the Blu-rays that you were just shitting on.In all seriousness though: It would have been great if they sold a version with the cleaned up & improved image quality without the added CGI.
https://www.amazon.com/Star-Trek-Or...1526461644&sr=8-12&keywords=star+trek+blu-rayI'd have no problems if the space shots would still be grain-y and lower res than the rest, if its still the original shots, and not the new crap with floating camera movements and pans that clash with the mostly static shots of the whole rest of the show.
I would actually shell out good money for that.
They did. And they're on the Blu-rays that you were just shitting on.
https://www.amazon.com/Star-Trek-Or...1526461644&sr=8-12&keywords=star+trek+blu-ray
The episodes on the Blu-rays are fully remastered during live action at all times. They use seamless branching to switch between original effects and CG.Okay, let me get this straight, because I read conflicting reports there: The un-altered version on the Blu-Ray still has the improved image quality?
Because as far as I understood it, it offered basically the new remastered version (better image quality, but also the new crappy effects) and the original DVD version (somewhat improved image quality from the earlier DVD scans, but not the complete HD overhaul they did for the Blu-Ray, but containing the original effects). Is that wrong? Is the original version on the Blu-Ray the same HD like the remastered one, just without the vfx? Because THEN I would take back everything!
It's just...confusing... I read the opposite, and I hadn't had a chance to confirm it myself, and to just "take a try" the Blu-Ray boxes are definitely too expensive.
The episodes on the Blu-rays are fully remastered during live action at all times. They use seamless branching to switch between original effects and CG.
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Star-Trek-The-Original-Series-Season-2-Blu-ray/6281/#Review
Who's been telling you the original cuts are in DVD quality on the Blu-rays?
i generally prefer the updated stuff (designs, not effects), but i was hoping for an unadulterated tholian ship too. just a solid piece of translucent red resin.When they announced the TOS Tholian ship, I was (naively) expecting the original model. Yes, that was pretty bare. But so is this. And the models aren't that big.
There is just extremely little information presented about the non-cgi extended version on those Blu-Rays. Does that mean the original space shots aren't touched up at all? Because that might be a problem as well, and a slight cleaning up of them from obvious degradation wouldn't hurt.
i generally prefer the updated stuff (designs, not effects), but i was hoping for an unadulterated tholian ship too. just a solid piece of translucent red resin.
funnily, not a single one of the TOS remastered ships has looked good in eaglemoss-form. at least not to me.Well, the original often times is only a single light effect for a starship, or even none at all. The updated stuff is hit (Orion ship from "journey to Babel") and miss (the Gorn ship). It's obvious though a lot of thought went into it - even if I prefer the original, the remastered design usually fits very well with the Trek world of the later spin-offs.
botany bay wasn't exactly a remastered ship though.Botany Bay - lots of metal, solid
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.