• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek: Starfleet Academy

The plaque for the Leondegrance (a John Eaves design that is woefully anachronistic for the time period in which it was built) also says that the ship was on a five year mission to the Lesser Magellanic Cloud, which is utter nonsense.
Not really.

It could have been on a mission there as part of some sort of exchange with the Kelvan's.

You know, the people who were capable of altering the Enterprises engines so they could make the Trip to the Andromeda galaxy in 300 years.
 
Not really.

It could have been on a mission there as part of some sort of exchange with the Kelvan's.

You know, the people who were capable of altering the Enterprises engines so they could make the Trip to the Andromeda galaxy in 300 years.

So why didn’t Starfleet outfit all their ships that way then? And why did it only take 5 years instead of 300? And why wasn’t that spelled out on the plaque?

I call shenanigans on that idea.
 
So why didn’t Starfleet outfit all their ships that way then? And why did it only take 5 years instead of 300? And why wasn’t that spelled out on the plaque?

I call shenanigans on that idea.
The same reason The Burn crippled the galaxy even though Dilithium was just used for power generation and there are a bunch of ways to generate the power for a warp drive without it. :rommie:
 
The same reason The Burn crippled the galaxy even though Dilithium was just used for power generation and there are a bunch of ways to generate the power for a warp drive without it. :rommie:
Don't they mention and even use other methods in DISCO?
 
Don't they mention and even use other methods in DISCO?
They did. Beamite (sp? No doubt someone will correct me) were noted and I believe transwarp corridor was referenced. But, given the ubiquity of dilithium even with Romulans and across the galaxy it seems hard to replace.
 
Don't they mention and even use other methods in DISCO?
Book's ship had slipstream drive. This was established in the very first episode set in the 32nd century.

 
Don't they mention and even use other methods in DISCO?
Nope.

They have Booker make an offhand mention of nobody having benaimite crystals for Slipstream and that's it. (Which was another hilarious oversight on the writers part because benamite was only needed for the second Slipstream drive and not the original.)

The obvious one's were Fission (Like the Phoenix), Fusion (Like the DY-500 and Promellians), Aldentuim, and the singularities used by the Romulans.
 
The same reason The Burn crippled the galaxy even though Dilithium was just used for power generation and there are a bunch of ways to generate the power for a warp drive without it. :rommie:

Not sure what that has to do with the Leondegrance’s five year mission to the Lesser Magellanic Cloud.
 
IIRC, the old Stargazer novel series also went with the 2326 commissioning date, though there's a lot in those novels that doesn't really add up anyway. Like the Constellation class being described as "capital ships" which I would think in the time period they take place in (2330s) that term would apply to the Excelsior and Ambassador class ships. The novels also describe the crew quarters on the Stargazer as "apartments" and are described as being spacious enough to include a living room, separate bedroom and bathroom. Even though in The Battle we see Picard's Stargazer quarters were significantly smaller.
I read the first one or two of those, and was put off by how little it resembled the ship in the show. They had more officers working at stations on the bridge than there were stations on the set. They also mention the only shuttlebay being small and in the rear when it's massive, 4-decks tall and wide as fuck and at the very front.

I think MJF may have been going off the script for "The Battle" and been treating Stargazer as a Constitution-class ship, which is what she ws going to be until a change of plans in post-production.
 
I read the first one or two of those, and was put off by how little it resembled the ship in the show. They had more officers working at stations on the bridge than there were stations on the set. They also mention the only shuttlebay being small and in the rear when it's massive, 4-decks tall and wide as fuck and at the very front.

I think MJF may have been going off the script for "The Battle" and been treating Stargazer as a Constitution-class ship, which is what she ws going to be until a change of plans in post-production.

Yeah, I don’t think MJF even knew what the ship looked like despite artwork of it slapped right on the cover. He certainly didn’t know what a New Orleans class starship looked like.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top