^ wholehearted agreement.
though i think if they'd said 'we worked on trek, we wanted to make our own trek, here's a fanfilm' i'd be less bothered than by the whole 'this isn't your grandfathers trek, cbs pilot' stuff theyve come out with.
Glad I didn't donate as I finally got around to Of Gods and Men last night (at least the first forty-minutes of it).
Coupling right-wing claptrap along with terrible writing/acting and video game quality special effects will not impress CBS.
Irks me when people complain about fan productions as if they paid to watch them.
For something that involved so many professionals and promised so much, OGAM was seriously underwhelming. I don't think it heled that people associated with it really hyped it up. And to be fair, we're seeing much of the same hype this time, which is what I think is turning some people off.
That said, I'll judge this effort on it's merits. Hopefully it's an enjoyable yarn, which is really all I'm looking for.![]()
I agree, they did hype it up a bit more than they should have. But they feel compelled to do so given the nature of the production (low budget indie). Sales of DVDs pay back some of the overhead. I do wonder if any of the original Star Trek cast members get some compensation, even if under the table (I think being part of AFTA or SAG means you must get paid by guild/association rates, unless it's a volunteer thing).
I'll be happy as long as the script is good. That was really the main thing that let OGAM down for me.
I'll be happy as long as the script is good. That was really the main thing that let OGAM down for me.
Union actors get paid for the work they do on these films. The union would most likely not allow them to be in the films otherwise. The rate of pay would be on the low end, as these are non-profit 'indie' films.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.