• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek: Picard teaser trailer

If this has been posted than I apologize for repeating it, but I look on Jammer's site at the various reviews and he linked this. It's the Picard Teaser as a viagra commercial. I thought it was hilarious.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

OMFG. That works on so many levels.
 
Yes it's not hard to see that the vacuum in leadership means that the Empire quickly falls into dozens of tinpot dictators ruling various sectors.
Now I'm having flashbacks to the Imperial splinter groups - admirals staking out territory, warlords, and so on - presented in the old Star Wars Expanded Universe post-Endor.
 
I sure hope ST: Picard does not get the "Discovery treatment" where the showrunners retcon a bunch of stuff, change the look of Romulans etc... Although the show is set in the future so they can some things like change the look of ships and tech without any issues.

Of course they're going to change it. I mean, we can't have things looking like they're form the 90s and stuff.
 
I sure hope ST: Picard does not get the "Discovery treatment" where the showrunners retcon a bunch of stuff, change the look of Romulans etc... Although the show is set in the future so they can some things like change the look of ships and tech without any issues.
Except the romulans should never have been give bumpy foreheads. This was done by the powers that be because they thought the audience was too dumb to figure out the difference between romulans and vulcans. I'd be fine with romulans not having bumpy foreheads in STP
 
I know its nitpicking on my side, but their are far easier and more convenient irrigation systems, with simple rubber tubes, to water your vineyards. Hovercraft look more futuristic and cooler though.

edit: And european vineyards often dont use any irrigation at all.

edit 2:

Attitudes about wine irrigation in Europe are changing. And you're failing to take into consideration the massive effect climate change will have on late 24th Century vinification.
 
The other Romulans we see in Spock's mind-meld just looked like normal Vulcans so I assume that's how they will look now.
 
"Fifteen years ago today, you led us out of the darkness. You commanded the greatest rescue armada in history. Then? The unimaginable. What did that cost you? Your faith? Your faith in us? Your faith in yourself? Tell us, why did you leave Starfleet, Admiral?"

Once I rescued those ripened grapes at Starflleet Academy from Boothby I had to make Chateu Picard '86
 
What if... The Romulans decided to purge the Reunification movement and that was Picard's heroic rescue mission? The unthinkable is Hobus and that leaves us with the Reunification movement being the only surviving Romulans?

The other Romulans we see in Spock's mind-meld just looked like normal Vulcans so I assume that's how they will look now.
One of the people in the leaked photos is dressed quite similarly to Nero's thugs, leading me to suspect they're one of the show's Romulan characters. I could of course be wrong, but I expect Picard to carry over a lot of the reimagined visuals from the Kelvin universe as Discovery did.
 
^I thought of Praxis before I wrote the above and I feel the writers of Star Trek VI used the same "logic" as what is being alluded to in the new Picard series - reducing interstellar empires to their home systems. The Unidiscovered Country referred to "dismantling the Starfleet" (or words to that effect)? Huh? I know, Cold War parallels.

The Federation has 150 members in the 24th Century. They have always been the big boys on the block compared to the other AQ powers vying for position. The Romulans & Klingons have always been presented as large interstellar empires with dominion over territory ... well, at least enough to have enough resources to pose a threat to a 150 member Federation.

I'm just saying that in BOTH the Praxis incident and the Romulus loss (the latter of which would be obviously devastating), the empires ought to have endured. In The Kelvin timeline Vulcan (a founding member) got sucked into a black hole. The Federation seemed to take it in it's stride and keep on chugging.

Anyone who's watched Nemesis knows how poorly the Romulans centralize their power. Kurtzman has already referred to the "dissolution of the Romulan Empire" so we know it happens.

And Earth falls = Federation dies has been the Trek trope forever.

Yes, you'd expect massive space empires to have plans X, Y and Z for catastrophic eventualities but apparently not in these ficticious worlds.:shrug:

The thing is the Romulans are a centralized, authoritarian regime. Taking the center out ot that - would be much, much more harmful than from a democracy that is used to self-gouvern through all regions.

If today Moscow or Peking would suddenly be innhalitated entirely - that would very likely take out the complete Russian or Chinese State as a result. Whereas if London or Washington+New York would vanish - that would be a massive catastrophe for both States, but the power structures are decentralized enough (and less violent internal conflict to errupt) that both would survive as functional States.
 
The thing is the Romulans are a centralized, authoritarian regime. Taking the center out ot that - would be much, much more harmful than from a democracy that is used to self-gouvern through all regions.

If today Moscow or Peking would suddenly be innhalitated entirely - that would very likely take out the complete Russian or Chinese State as a result. Whereas if London or Washington+New York would vanish - that would be a massive catastrophe for both States, but the power structures are decentralized enough (and less violent internal conflict to errupt) that both would survive as functional States.

Russia and China would survive the obliteration of their capitals, too. It is not like they don't have politicians in the regions and other cities. The countries won't just fall apart. I think of your four examples the UK would suffer the most. A really large percentage of their population lives in London and then there is this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_London

"London produced in 2016 about £408 billion or $765 billion, over 22% of UK GDP, while the economy of the London metropolitan area—the largest in Europe—generates about 30 per cent of the UK's GDP (or an estimated $669 billion in 2005)."
 
Russia and China would survive the obliteration of their capitals, too. It is not like they don't have politicians in the regions and other cities. I think of your four examples the UK would suffer the most. A really large percentage of their population lives in London and then there is this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_London

"London produced in 2016 about £408 billion or $765 billion, over 22% of UK GDP, while the economy of the London metropolitan area—the largest in Europe—generates about 30 per cent of the UK's GDP (or an estimated $669 billion in 2005)."

I know where dealing in hypotheticals here - but that wasn't talking about GDP or population share.
Just completely ignoring any outside interference:

The UK - Brexit and all - has a much more resistant form of gouvernment, and very clear rules about how it elects it's leaders. If London would be taken out, of course that would be a massive blow to everything in the UK, from economics to morale. But all the cities and regions would follow the book - create an election for the survivors, have a clear power-structure, continue on seperation of powers. The biggest problems would be logistical - organizing and distributing everything.

Any authoritarian regime has armed insurgents, organizations within that are desperate for seccession (whereas in the UK, Scotland would get closer to England should that happen) - but most importantly, the lack of seperation of powers creates a "free for all"-situation: Local gouvernments would fight with each other for who's in power, there is no clear rule of succession in dact, and the "rulebook" got changed so much, it's not a reliable guideline - because the power was centralized by people, not by institutions.

If the American Supreme Court got taken out - there's a clear line of succession, and people wouldn't question the authority of the people moving up in ranks. And they could put up their court in a tent for all intents and purposes, they'd be legitimate

But if you have a leader that has installed a court with judges based on their loyalty, that people know bends the rules to the gouvernment's wishes - this instution itself breaks down once the people inside are gone.

The problem wouldn't be the immediate fallout in form of dead people or economy breaking down - The problem would be the complete anhilation of the entiretly of the known power structures through the entire ruled region, and a lack of legitimacy of any successors.
 
A mixture of smooth and bumpy headed Romulans works for me. Perhaps that's how their race developed. Some retained their Vulcan heritage more than others. Either that or they augmented their foreheads to differentiate themselves from Vulcans. Quite a few Romulans in TOS wore helmets so they could have had bumpy foreheads that we never saw.
 
Definitely seems the best and most plausible possibility. But damned if they go back to that well again. The whole supernova traveling at warp is already pretty absurd event, but then it suddenly accelerated and got to Romulus faster than expected? Never liked that whole thing in ST09 and I hope they don't spend too much time on in in STP.
They could just retcon it to being the Romulan home star.
 
What we are going to find out is that Picard mowed down some of his grape vines and has a whole patch of soil used for growing weed as well. Picard spends most of his days getting drunk and high.

Jason
 
What we are going to find out is that Picard mowed down some of his grape vines and has a whole patch of soil used for growing weed as well. Picard spends most of his days getting drunk and high.

Jason
And after the first few scenes he'll end up so high that in the scenes from his inner POV, he'll be played by Seth Rogen. Sir Patrick will only play Picard whenever the scene is from someone else's POV.
 
They could just retcon it to being the Romulan home star.

"Retcon"? The movie actually shows it being the Romulan home star, doing a continuous run from Romulus through a rubble field to the star which then blows up, sweeps away the rubble field and shatters Romulus. It always was that, and never Hobus (because as everybody knows, the Romulan home star is called Eisn instead :vulcan: ).

I'm cautiously positive about all these statements on the show being "grounded", visually and perhaps thematically. Lots of close-ups on characters in utilitarian sets and minimally dressed locations, so that it takes six episodes to patch together what the hero ship might look like, perhaps?

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top