Actually, yes, I think you just might be.Am I the only one who likes Narek? I was amused by that lazy-eyed scumbag chipmunk
Actually, yes, I think you just might be.Am I the only one who likes Narek? I was amused by that lazy-eyed scumbag chipmunk
I thought he was alright and I prefered him to his high camp evil sisterAm I the only one who likes Narek? I was amused by that lazy-eyed scumbag chipmunk
Its not real Trek if they dont modify the deflector dish to emit a beam in every episodeSeason 2 needs more warp core breaches. Dont think we got any breach this season. And space anomalies
Well, hey, Geordi was in an episode of VOY and he did visit DS9, even though it was technically an episode of TNG. So, they count.Was there even a "Level 2 Diagnostic" all series? Only Geordi can do those!
It doesn't work on wood.Some unrealistic technobabble thing that comes out of nowhere you say? Who's only purpose is to solve problems and to make up for a lack in writing talent?
Its not real Trek if they dont modify the deflector dish to emit a beam in every episode
So you’re saying it’s Star Trek?Some unrealistic technobabble thing that comes out of nowhere you say? Who's only purpose is to solve problems and to make up for a lack in writing talent?
![]()
Because it was long ago. It's like a lot of historical advisers on shows too.he days of having real scientists discussing details with those creating the show so that advice from, say, actual astronomers and astrophysicists could inform the writing seem to have loooooooong gone.
So you’re saying it’s Star Trek?
And the complainers continue to make it all about themselves. I'm growing weary of the Trek BBs for the first time in 17 years.No, nothing has changed. Yet the complaining continues as though its the first time.
Because it was long ago. It's like a lot of historical advisers on shows too.
Sorry, I go to Trek for different reasons than science education.
It was not meant as patronizing. It's more an observation that the fantastical elements have always been a part of Trek, and that the basic underlying science has largely given way to Trek's in universe technologies.That’s a more than slightly patronising comment. I’m not talking about science education — and you know that.
I’m making the point that while Trek has always been storytelling or, supposedly, a morality play wrapped in sci-fi form, there was a point where they made some effort to try to have their basic underlying science more-or-less based in reality.
Of course, there is always a fantastical element; that’s in the nature of sci-fi that is telling its stories using speculative future technologies, not to mention that there will always be story requirements that require them to bend their own rules with dramatic licence.
I’m sure I’m not the only one who misses that aspect of their production values.
This is actually very valuable! I haven't written my TMP reaction parody yet. It's a challenge because I have to keep "tru fan" outrage reactions ("How can they do this?!") separate from general audience reactions ("It's so boring!") and make it funny at the same time. TWOK gave me more to work with because it was "Roddenberry vs. Bennett/Meyer", which is easier to do than "Roddenberry vs. Roddenberry". But this gives me a start.This was written in 1979 in regards to Star Trek the motion picture, but if you switch out the name Gene Roddenberry with Alex kurtzman, it could have been written yesterday...
https://amp.reddit.com/r/StarTrekDi...k_superfan_leslie_thompson_writing_about_the/
They glossed over it. I'm under the assumption the second season will fill us in early on.It's kind of strange that the last episode didn't give any clue as to why they are all still together on the ship. Or maybe I just need to rewatch.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.