It's not Avenger-class? https://sto.gamepedia.com/Avenger_BattlecruiserThey look like a good match, although I am leaning towards the Noble class rather than the Imperial class.
It's not Avenger-class? https://sto.gamepedia.com/Avenger_BattlecruiserThey look like a good match, although I am leaning towards the Noble class rather than the Imperial class.
Memory Alpha seems to confirm that there are two beings named 'Picard' now....
Memory Alpha's entry for 'Jean-Luc Picard' has now been changed from 'Deceased (2399)' to "Active as Jean-Luc Picard (golem) (2399)"
Still has two separate entries for 'humanoid' Picard and 'golem' Picard though.
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Jean-Luc_Picard
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Jean-Luc_Picard_(golem)
Data said that before Picard died, they were able to scan, map, and transfer a complete neural image of his brain substrates. So in other words, they copied his mind.while in Picard's case they actually transferred his mind
No, he said that before his brain activity ceased completely. The key word here is transfer. They did not make a copy of Picard, they transferred his mind to a new body while his old body died. Mind transference has happened numerous times before In Star Trek and the person wasn't treated as some separate entity.Data said that before Picard died, they were able to scan, map, and transfer a complete neural image of his brain substrates. So in other words, they copied his mind.
A transfer took place, but it was of a neural image they made from scans of his mind.The key word here is transfer.
A distinction without a difference.A transfer took place, but it was of a neural image they made from scans of his mind.
It's your opinion that there is no difference between a person and a copy?A distinction without a difference.
In the make believe world of Trek? Yes.It's your opinion that there is no difference between a person and a copy?
One thing I didn't like, which is prevalent in a LOT of scifi and action these days, is the clutter. Too many ships and things going on at once. It's like the visual guys have A.D.D. I get that battles and scenarios like that are going to be hectic and chaotic, but it was just too cluttered. I had the same issue with the DISCOVERY season 2 finale.
How did it not have meaning? Because it happened in a movie that sucked? Data saved Picard and was ultimately responsible for blowing up the Reman ship after Picard froze. We did get a goodbye scene in this episode that we did not in Nemesis, but the meaning was always there.
This is the old argument about the transporter.It's your opinion that there is no difference between a person and a copy?
By definition, a copy is not the same thing as the original no matter how precise.In the make believe world of Trek? Yes.
Exactly, yes.In the make believe world of Trek? Yes.
So are you arguing that Harry Kim should be two articles on memory alpha as well?By definition, a copy is not the same thing as the original no matter how precise.
TOS solved that puzzle (Dr. Corby, the spores, Sargon and co., Norman and co.—I’m sure I’m forgetting some). Ignoring immortality is basic Star Trek.
It's your opinion that there is no difference between a person and a copy?
For a good sci-fi read on the subject, check out Kiln People by David Brin. He even calls the duplicates "golems," IIRC.This is the old argument about the transporter.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.