• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Picard 1x02 - "Maps and Legends"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    303
Frankly it all depends on your personal experience. There are people who will forever have difficulty attracting a sexual partner, and then there are people that for almost their entire life can hook up all the time. Just like there are some people who are better at finding a long term partner, then a casual hookup, and people who are great at casual hookup who have a terrible time finding a long term partner, and of course every combination in-between. I know that if I wanted even in my 50's I could meet and hook up with some one, today. As for the MeToo movement, well here is some easy advise that helps with the vast majority of situations. Don't hook up when you or the other person is drinking or using drugs. Make sure its not someone who feels you are in a position of power over (ie don't hook up with people you work with, or who interact with your job), make sure the other person is on the same page with you. If this is something you aren't great at, then once you've made contact, let the other person be in the driver's seat, so that they are the ones to initiate anything, putting you in the position to say no, if anything crosses the line. And just to let you know, this is what I was told when I was 18 back in 1985 in a terribly uncomfortable conversation with my Dad. The rule about drinking and drugs wasn't so much about consent at that time, but was so I wouldn't be careless about protection thanks to HIV.

As for how common it is, it might be a lot more common than you think. Technology has certainly made it easier, as there are apps on phones that will literally ping the people near you who are interested in just hooking up.

As for Trek, well even going back to the 60's we had Kirk putting his shoes on in episode, which was to imply he just had relations with an "alien" guest star of the week. In Star Trek Beyond in the opener, we see what looks like a pretty sudden pull my into your quarters scene, and a I am throwing you out of my quarters before your clothes are even on, which both imply fairly casual attitudes to sex. And we certainly have seen characters on TNG and DS9 imply fairly quick sexual interaction in the span of an episode. How long did it take Harry from having sex in Disease, after he meet the women? In Into Darkness Kirk is frolicking around with two women, I assume he isn't polyamorous, and this was a hook up, not a relationship with multiple partners. Heck on TNG we saw a younger crewman enjoying time with Troi (when she was under the influence, but he wasn't). In Conundrum when everyone has lost their memories, it is strongly implied that Riker and Ro hooked up almost immediately. So Trek certainly as hinted that this does happen.

Oh and just to point out we actually don't know how long it was from when they meet to when they hooked up. It could have been that night, it could be days. We can't assume just because we see time flow at a certain pace on Earth with Picard, that a similar time span is happening with the Romulans. Clearly that's the case because we see two scenes with Picard intercutting when they appear at different times, in different locations.
In short, even in this conservative century, people hook up all the time, at the drop of a hat-- especially hormone-driven young people. :rommie:
 
Starfleet crawling with infiltrators...?
I kinda hoped that trope was over and done with.
It was my belief that Picard and his crew represented the best of both humanity and the fleet but this show seems intent on portraying Picard as an outlier,the only moral man in a universe of bastardry.
 
Jarok was probably trying to get a response from Data aka he lied. Romulans do lie.
But that doesn’t make sense either, especially when you consider the Enterprise Season 4 trilogy with the robotic ships controlled by the Aenar . Sure by TNG that was 200 years in the past (and written well after “Thd Defector”) but it still gives the Romulans cybernetics and robotics technology.
 
No doubt there's a line drawn in vacuum somewhere, just like the Amish shun machines except for certain sorts.

Until we learn what the taboo or hang-up is specifically about, we can't plausibly argue what it would encompass and what not. Perhaps only machine men are banned, while automated lawnmowers are fine?

Timo Saloniemi
 
Man this was good. That scene with the admiral was awesome. I hope Picard doesn't loosen his ideals though.

I don't think so. I think it will be the other way around - Picard trying to restore the loss ideals of the Federation he stood for his six decade Starfleet away and instill it to a new generation of space adventures - the misfits he recruited during his final space adventure and voyage.
 
I find I still mostly* agree with him. This was absolutely a 2.5 star episode – a lot of good scenes, but no overall cohesion or narrative drive. It's table setting for what will hopefully be real stories down the line.

*I would give Remembrance 3.5 instead of the 3 he gives it, but he's right that the pilot was a stronger episode than this one.
Wow, I love Jammer's reviews. And he nailed it with this episode.
I generally find him to be too harsh on episodes that are setting things up. I believe he's harsher on them now than he was in 1999 with DS9's "Penumbra", "'Til Death Do Us Part", and "Strange Bedfellows". I think there's some bias on his part. I feel "Maps and Symbols" is better than two-and-a-half stars. 2.5 stars is what I think of as "middle of the road". I gave it an 8/10, which would be the equivalent of 3 stars. It got me more interested in the "world" of 2399. "Middle of the road" doesn't get me more interested in anything.

It introduced the concept of the Zhat Vash. It closes the door of Starfleet as an option for Picard. It explained why he doesn't decide to turn to his former crew of the Enterprise for help. It sets up he'll need a new/different crew. Which leads him directly to Musiker and directly into the next episode. It sets up the idea that Picard has a neurological disorder, which I'm dead-sure will pay off later. It also established the web that Commodore Oh is the linchpin of, with Rizzo reporting to her and Rizzo using Narek to get to Soji.

It has narrative cohesion. It just doesn't have the traditional style of something being set up and resolved in the same episode. I think Jammer just doesn't like the style of writing or the choices they made. That's all well and good. But it's not random things that are happening in the episode. If it were all random and nothing would be of consequence, then I'd agree with you and he. If I didn't know I was watching the second tenth of a complete story, I'd agree.
 
Last edited:
Ann Magnuson, who played Admiral Clancy, had a bit of a musical career back in the 80s and 90s. She fronted a couple of bands, one of which was named... Vulcan Death Grip (the other was "Bongwater"). They were a satirical faux heavy metal band. They were interesting, to say the least.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Interestingly, many of the posters there see Picard having similarities with Disco, although unlike myself, they aren't pleased about that being so and complaints about CSI styling does seem to be rampant. And there's also a lot of dislike over at IGN. Looks like it's going to take some continued heavy lifting for even Patrick Stewart to carry fandom into the 2020s.

The CSI/NCIS complaint makes me laugh. NCIS in particular is basically the TNG format anyway. Gibbs is Picard, you have the ‘young womanising’ Riker type, Abbey and whotsisname geek boy are covering Data/Geordi/Wesley, and MacCullums character is your basic Starfleet doctor type. We even get Yar types, and a Marina Sirtis guest role.
 
But you can build nuclear power plants and still ban nuclear weapons. The fissile fuel each requires is different in terms of % U-235 or Pu-239. That's what the Iran nuclear deal was all about -- they could process up to the purity for nuclear power plants, but no more.

Sure you can, but that hasn't happened. The USA shredded a nuclear arms treaty with Russia and also the Iranian Nuclear deal … both within, what? the past 2 years. Despite that new nuclear power plants are still being built. Granted some are "cleaner" than others.

No respectable physicist actually thought that the Earth would be destroyed. ...

Exactly my point, thank you! Reason and rationality was prevalent , won the day, and won it handily. They didn't let fear stop them. Fear is the antithesis of science.
 
It doesn't fit. In Into Darkness the Klingons are an unknown threat, in Disco they've just had a massive war.

I never got the sense from STiD that the Klingons were unknown. On the contrary, Marcus knew pretty much all about them, and knew that there was a war on the horizon. Uhura was fluent in the language, too. Not something you can do if you're not very familiar with the species.
 
Sure you can, but that hasn't happened. The USA shredded a nuclear arms treaty with Russia and also the Iranian Nuclear deal … both within, what? the past 2 years. Despite that new nuclear power plants are still being built. Granted some are "cleaner" than others.

But you can't build nuclear weapons with reactor grade fuel. It just won't work. So, if someone really wanted to ban nuclear weapons but keep nuclear power, it's totally possible to do so.

Exactly my point, thank you! Reason and rationality was prevalent , won the day, and won it handily. They didn't let fear stop them. Fear is the antithesis of science.

No. Theree was never any fear among physicists about the Earth being destroyed. That storyline came about by the average joe who heard "black holes at the LHC" and didn't understand the whole picture.
 
Wow, I love Jammer's reviews. And he nailed it with this episode.

Many I adore, some I partially disagree with. But he puts time into them and that's what counts. :D Still, I need to look up what this "peak TV" concept is... is it a term that amounts to everything cannibalizing old shows because they can't think of genuine innovation anymore? (e.g. Firefly was based on Blake's 7 and other shows and things but added and changed enough to make it feel like its own show. Or Star Wars taking Samurai tropes and adding a couple twists with day-glo swords and an art deco mask with cape?)

My thoughts on episode two:

The scenes with the Commodore made me shake my head. Please don't tell me we're going to do more Section 31/shady spy BS in Star Trek. I can accept Starfleet Intelligence existing, but in this future where humanity is always portrayed as wanting for nothing and wanting peace over conflict, what is the impetus for having an organization that is doing more than intelligence gathering? Also, Section 31 has always been lazy writing with base level shadowy characters that are portrayed as doing "whatever it takes" and the main characters having to save the day with ideals. This worked once, maybe because William Sadler is such an awesome actor, but each with use subsequent use, the returns have diminished. I will be frustrated if we go down this route.

As Jammer said, this is "peak TV" so definitely expect more of the same apocryphal BS. It's ironic since the DS9 episode that introduced them was intriguing - like a double-edged sword. As you indicated with the law of diminishing returns.

Why did the Commodore have to be a Vulcan? If we are having characters doing shady things that doesn't jive with Vulcan ideals, especially the IDIC on her desk. I don't think any series has done the Vulcans right outside of Spock and Tuvok.

Sybok was the closest to a Vulcan being different that was even remotely interesting. PIC was probably trying to go down a not dissimilar route to improve upon or one-up the concept.

The whole Lieutenant Rizzo storyline has tipped their hand too early in my opinion. We weren't sure what Narek was up to. Most of us figured it was no good, but to lock that in so early could be an unfortunate misstep depending on where they go with it. In the meantime, it kills any mystery of his story line.

It bugged me more that Picard states he never got into sci-fi, despite referncing a Dyson sphere by name, amongst other things... ***********

The use of swearing seems to have a lot of people on social media wound up with some declaring this "wasn't their Trek." First off, "isn't my" is the most overused and tiresome BS on social media today. Secondly, I was fine with it. Trek has always promoted humanity as being perfect or as close to perfect as one can get, but people also get frustrated and angry. The new mediums that bring us Trek have allowed this kind of language to be used and frankly it makes them seem more human.

Forgetting it's still crass in general, that scene from Star Trek IV is still a fun one (given the context of dealing with our 20th century that they're thrown into).

Picard swore in French in season 2 TNG, albeit once. That's probably how it made it on screen to begin with. The h-word or d-word are tame and can convey just as much if not more, especially if the underlying situation feels authentic and not melodraaaaaaaaaama - the more of that usually results in the use of the far nastier words.

But it still comes across uncouth and very 21st century civilian, which is out of place in established 24th century (would dialect and inflection change THAT MUCH in two decades? Dialect, perhaps, since nobody really says "gag me with a spoon" or other trashy valleyspeak anymore yet somehow "merch" came back with insane gusto and from a decade almost everyone claims to loathe but keeps the hip dialect and other things anyway but I digress) They believe they're making "adult, mature" television, but it's only juvenile. It really isn't "****ing cool". The more they do it per-episode, and especially if it's done in many if not every episode... Give it some depth and steeped reason. Not hipster trash like the 1990s flick "Total Recall" - a great movie but a swear every x seconds apart wasn't needed. Like standup comedians who swear every 5 seconds because that's always funny... it really isn't. Mass audiences might like it but a lot of ciggie smokers in the 1950s were calling nonsmokers uncool too...

That said, I'm happy many people are fine with it. It's okay to be for or against it. Indeed, your reason is one of the best ones yet, to be fair. Heck, plenty of 21st century people sometimes use 13th century words and even grunts like "ug" and other leftovers from prehistoric caveman days so perhaps I'm too stern and obstinate on this particular issue... But would I want to see Shatner Kirk or the real McCoy effenheimer up the s-word-er incessantly? Nope... they got better messages across without needing to stoop. /mytwocents

Side note: Should any Trek series waddle around on Earth for so long, just call it "Earth Trek" instead?

The scenes of Picard and Laris piecing together the scene of the crime could've been better served with lighter technobabble. Another kernel of lazy writing is layering on words that don't mean anything to the viewer. Using a metaphor to explain what is going on would be helpful.

TNG wasn't perfect in this regard as well but the actors made it work. LeVar in particular is underrated as an actor given what he had to belt out and even the nonconvincing stuff he could make work as her made it all sound authentic, having the words feel authentic too helps. Yet when VOY came about it kept shoveling in the technobabble but in such a diluted and haphazard state that it became the source of much mockery and who could blame them, it was lackadaisically made...

One thing I was happy to see in this episode was the continued strong universe-building. Having seen where Discovery season three is going with a future where the Federation has fallen, you can theoretically begin to see the cracks here when Clancy comments that eighteen members almost left over helping the Romulans. All empires fall and it is amazing to see the two series in a kind of lock step to grow the universe.

Why does the Federation need to fall in order to make a series? That's a bit of a cliche too. It's certainly trite... at the same time, given TNG movies and a couple tail-end episodes pulling the "Corrupt Federation Personnel" card every other movie or what not, PIC comes across even less compelling as a result. But it probably was done so Stewart could act like Stewart in front of the camera instead of acting out Picard. That would make sense...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top