• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

"Star Trek" movie toy report from Toy Fair Germany...

And then there were the problems with the Playmates' "First Contact" Enterprise... That was bad too.
 
Captain Robert April said:
Starship Polaris said:
What we've seen of it so far is pretty similar to the TOS ship...

Get thee to an optometrist.

Nope, sorry. My definition of "close" just isn't particularly anal retentive. The TMP ship and the TNG ship are pretty similar to the original, too. :cool:
 
Yeah the word similar doesn't mean "exact duplicate of the 1960s Enterprise". The glimpse we got of the ship in the trailer looked great to me.
 
Starship Polaris said:
My definition of "close" just isn't particularly anal retentive. The TMP ship and the TNG ship are pretty similar to the original, too.
If all they wanted to get was 'close' they should have made Galaxy Quest II.

---------------
 
SonicRanger said:
Well, we know how accurate the "Generations" actions figures were.

Not only the TNG uniforms though. I'm pretty sure the Kirk in movie uniform is called 'Admiral Kirk' even though he's a Captain in the film and has the Captain rank insignia on his uniform. (I have the fig, in the package, somewhere)
 
The Castellan said:

Anyone think it's pathetic the conservative places tried to NOT sell the Duras sisters, simply cause of cleavege? :rolleyes:
I actually find it rather hard to BELIEVE. I'd like to hear about where, specifically, this was the case.

Also, I don't think that "conservative" is the right word to use. Supposing that there were places that this sort of overprotective, governmental-nanny-state attitudes were actually present... that's NOT a "conservative" attitude.

I'd suspect that if there was a lower sales figure for those two figures, it would more likely be due to the stores choosing to carry more of the figures which they assumed people would at least RECOGNIZE.
 
scotthm said:
Starship Polaris said:
My definition of "close" just isn't particularly anal retentive. The TMP ship and the TNG ship are pretty similar to the original, too.
If all they wanted to get was 'close' they should have made Galaxy Quest II.

---------------

And (based on the first "Galaxy Quest") in doing so would probably be making a better "Star Trek" film than most of the first ten - which is rather the point of making a new Trek movie, right?

Bring Back Tim Allen! :lol:
 
Cary L. Brown said:
Also, I don't think that "conservative" is the right word to use. Supposing that there were places that this sort of overprotective, governmental-nanny-state attitudes were actually present... that's NOT a "conservative" attitude.

You should tell that to the Republican Conservatives. Maybe then they won't get their panties in a twist about flag burning, gay marriage, Evolution curricula, Brain dead women on Life support, or a President's lack of weenie control.
 
Starship Polaris said:
scotthm said:
Starship Polaris said:
My definition of "close" just isn't particularly anal retentive. The TMP ship and the TNG ship are pretty similar to the original, too.
If all they wanted to get was 'close' they should have made Galaxy Quest II.

---------------

And (based on the first "Galaxy Quest") in doing so would probably be making a better "Star Trek" film than most of the first ten - which is rather the point of making a new Trek movie, right?

Bring Back Tim Allen! :lol:

Lol, and the film could be about the production of a new Galaxy Quest film, with new younger actors playing the roles, except that Alan Rickman was asked back to reprise his role and Tim Allen wasn't.
 
Starship Polaris said:
scotthm said:
...they should have made Galaxy Quest II.
And (based on the first "Galaxy Quest") in doing so would probably be making a better "Star Trek" film than most of the first ten...
Very possibly. I'm not a very big fan of any of the Star Trek films myself.

---------------
 
Valar said:
Cary L. Brown said:
Also, I don't think that "conservative" is the right word to use. Supposing that there were places that this sort of overprotective, governmental-nanny-state attitudes were actually present... that's NOT a "conservative" attitude.

You should tell that to the Republican Conservatives. Maybe then they won't get their panties in a twist about flag burning, gay marriage, Evolution curricula, Brain dead women on Life support, or a President's lack of weenie control.

Far be it for me to drop-kick this thread into TNZ, but, IIRC, Tipper Gore certainly had her panties in a bunch regarding musically "offensive materials" back in the 90's and I'm preeeeeety sure she's not a conservative. Censorship ain't just for the right anymore there, my friend.

It's whatever gets votes and for whom.
 
Valar said:

You should tell that to the Republican Conservatives. Maybe then they won't get their panties in a twist about flag burning, gay marriage, Evolution curricula, Brain dead women on Life support, or a President's lack of weenie control.

There's a difference between the private and public sectors, between the sale of Star Trek toys and high government officials perjuring themselves, between cleavage on toys and attempts to protect humans who can't protect themselves*. Besides, flag burning hasn't been a serious issue for years, and evolution has been a non-starter at the national level and most of the states.

*If you're referring to Terry Schiavo, she wasn't brain dead. "Look up the right words, the ones for today. Use them correctly, and mean what [you] say."
 
22 Stars said:
Lol, and the film could be about the production of a new Galaxy Quest film, with new younger actors playing the roles, except that Alan Rickman was asked back to reprise his role and Tim Allen wasn't.

Allen/Taggart's reaction would be great and over the top. Fred Kwan, of course, wouldn't care - he'd think it was all cool. :lol:

Someone get to work on this.

scotthm said:I'm not a very big fan of any of the Star Trek films myself.

---------------

Great, then there's no problem at all - bring it on!
 
Warp Coil said:
I realize this is probably going too far here... but what are the chances that the action figure prototypes seen at this Toy Fair are decoys? Or, at least, not completely accurate to the final product?

Historically, the chances are pretty good, especially where Playmates is concerned. Combine that with Abrams' notorious penchant for cloak & dagger and it wouldn't surprise me if what's being shown at Toy Fair is simply for the press. It's possible buyers are seeing something entirely different.

Worst case scenario we get figures from deleted scenes.

kir2.jpg
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top