• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Lower Decks 1x02 - "Envoys"

Rate the episode...

  • 10 - It was everything I wished for.

    Votes: 16 10.7%
  • 9

    Votes: 32 21.3%
  • 8

    Votes: 46 30.7%
  • 7

    Votes: 30 20.0%
  • 6

    Votes: 12 8.0%
  • 5

    Votes: 8 5.3%
  • 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • 2

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • 1 - I dream of better Trek.

    Votes: 4 2.7%

  • Total voters
    150
An 8.

I just liked this one a lot. Two B-Stories EXCEPT these 24th century characters are actual/relatable human beings and not Gene Roddenberry/Rick Berman emotionally well adjusted mannequins.

had they had actual relatable human characters like these in TNG proper, I probably would have enjoyed that series a lot more. Yeah, they go a bit overboard here and there (IMO to good and comedic effect for the most part); but at the core they are human beings who look out, and care about each other, but definitely ain't 'perfect, or perfectly well adjusted (and that goes for the Bridge crew characters too.)

Again, just a simple, and sometimes funny episode set deeply in the Star trek Universe.
 
No offense meant, but you said "I would gladly talk about things I liked" and then proceeded to talk about another thing you hated.

People might have an easier time understanding why this isn't your jam if you say what is.

I mean I would gladly talk about things I liked if I liked this show. Even if I didn't like the show, I'd give it credit if it did even one thing well.

Sure, I talk about "Things I like" all the time, but in a "lower decks" forum, I talk about "lower decks." Which is, at present, not a thing I like.
 
So, not quite as good as last week's episode (which I gave a 10). So this week is an 8 for me.

Still loving it, just not as sharp as last time. Still love practically everything about this show. It's great having a Trek show to look forward to again every week, if nothing else, for the sheer promise of an open, episodic world to explore.

I like Picard and Discovery well enough, but their serialized, darker stories and occasional failures to execute their vision (again probably a serialization issue with the writers and the production process) made it less "fun" (?) looking forward to new episodes than it should have been. So, hooray for LDS! (and hooray for more hope in the future in SNW!)

...Last episode it seemed like the senior officers didn't really care about the lower deck crew, but not this week. That whole plotline and the ending moment with Tendi was heartwarming...
i sorta had that impression about the senior officers too, but I think it was just from that moment used in the trailer where the deck officer (?) welcoming Tendi to the ship tells her "move along lower decks". In the trailer it felt like an insult and I didn't like the tone. In the episode itself it comes off as more like "move along we have lots a people to onboard" and the "lower deck" part was more like just an acknowledgement of her station. I think the trailer played that up on purpose to highlight "these guys are not your standard bridge crew level" and it came across as mean, but the characters are clearly TNG-era good characters. The only other time it cropped up was when the senior officers ignored the contributions of the lower deckers in ending the Rage Virus. But that was a minor, minor slight at most - given the lower deckers didn't actually do anything except accidentally and unknowingly bring the raw material for the cure onboard with them. It wasn't even like Mariner or Boimler even thought of the potential of a cure from the goo.

What bothers me the most now is that Section 31 went from being top secret to being official and widely known, then back to top secret again, and then back to widely known again. :eek::ack::brickwall::crazy::sigh::wtf:

Blame "Discovery" - Enterprise and DS9 had a logical consistency - 31 was a secret organization until Bashir revealed them to a vast swath of Starfleet command and apparently regular officers too. Discovery screwed with it for the "cool factor", but didn't pull it off.

...
  1. There were notably less attempts to make jokes. I only really laughed at one thing this week - the "Janeway protocol" - but it was way, way funnier than anything in the first episode. Aside from that though the episode was lighthearted but not trying to make us bust a gut. Which was fine, because it had heart in spades. ...
I just want to know what the Janeway Protocol is. I wonder if they are going to keep it as a running joke, or let us in on it at some point.

My one issue with the episode: If Rutherford is this hard working and beloved within engineering, I can't see how the series isn't going to promote him to lt. junior grade.

Of course, you could still be "Lower Decks" and not be an ensign I suppose.

Lavelle gets promoted in the original "Lower Decks" episode, so it is canon you can be promoted and still be lower decks.

It was alright. I liked the command training simulation. I assume the Janeway protocol is to get lost? :)

Having Boimler know about Section 31 was a bit silly. I expect better from this team than to make Discovery mistakes.
It's not LDS that screwed up. It's DIS. Bashir outed them in DS9, and LDS is totally consistent with that.

I don't entirely see it that way. She jeopardized the mission, which ended poorly, of them delivering the Klingon to the conference or whatever by her reckless actions. Barging onto the shuttle, putting herself in the mission, putting herself in CHARGE of the mission and treating Boimer like crap, getting the Klingon drunk, leaving him behind on the shuttle which gave him opportunity to steal it, thus forcing them to have to walk through the different districts where, sure, Boimer wasn't 100% prepared but would anyone entirely be who hadn't had the experience Mariner apparently has?

And there's other ways to train and teach people things other than treating them like crap and making them feel like crap...
Probably because she's always yelling, shouting and just generally being an obnoxious know-it-all. Want to teach Purple Hair some stuff? How about doing it WITHOUT crashing his mission and treating him like crap while he's piloting the shuttle?
We get it. You hate Mariner and nothing she ever does is correct in your eyes. I think we can move on from that, probably don't need to get your next week's searing take on how crappy she is and how she treats everyone else like crap. Got it covered.

Also, why do you call Boimler "Boimer" a couple of times, then revert back to calling him "Purple Hair"? Both make it seem like you are purposely trying to be insulting to the character, the show, and fans who like it. It's getting tiring already.

The cold opening was odd. I assume a later episode will continue the open plot thread of the entity inside her mother.

That energy entity died attacking the Captain after having nearly exhausted itself making the tricorder. It is likely never coming back. Think of it as a cold open.

And I have issues with that, and is the reason why I have problems with DS9.

One of my favorite things about DS9 is its depiction of the idea that it is "easy to be a saint in paradise". In the Federation proper and in TNG, it was "easy" for the characters to stick to their ideals and always live up to them. In DS9 that is harder to do, and it is on purpose. Within the setting of the show the characters have a harder time because they are on the frontier and they don't have all the might of the Federation (physically, legally, and morally) to fix every situation as the Federation would normally do it. But they still try. Also, within the approach to the show itself, the writers and producers wanted it to be more realistic; they didn't think the idealized characters from TNG were as realistic or fun to play as they wanted in their show and that that "saint in paradise" stuff was too easy. They created a show to test Star Trek ideals in tougher situations, to show that the characters - even when pressed hard - might bend or break a little, but would still work toward those ideals and, in the vast majority of cases, succeed in upholding them. But the few times they failed, it made their successes all the more significant and the impact of the stories greater.

Yeah, I too love the "perfect" Picard of TNG for being the best of what humanity should/could be, but I also love the Sisko of DS9 who struggles every day to be that best self and bring his ideals to "the frontier" (as Bashir called it at one time).
 
Last edited:
Lavelle gets promoted in the original "Lower Decks" episode, so it is canon you can be promoted and still be lower decks.
We don't know what happened regarding Lavelle. He was promoted only in the very last scene of the ep, and he was off duty. All we know is that he got promoted, and thus no longer had to share a room with Taurik.
 
We don't know what happened regarding Lavelle. He was promoted only in the very last scene of the ep, and he was off duty. All we know is that he got promoted, and thus no longer had to share a room with Taurik.
I was trying to be a little funny. I guess I should have remembered on the internet to include obvious indications of the intent of the words - like an emoji.

I was just trying to say that one of the main story threads of the original Lower Decks episode was one of the lower deckers getting promoted, so, within "lower decks", promotion could certainly be on the table. I didn't mean that we know absolutely that within Starfleet officers are still considered "lower deckers" at the LT JG level. And you are right, getting a promotion to serve on the bridge might make Lavelle no longer "technically" lower decks. But in the spirit of the lower decks/junior officers I think he would still very much qualify to stay in the group, as would Rutherford.
 
I truly love that the series is still Star Trek and depicts a positive future. It’s just funny — and that’s all that really sets it apart from the other shows. The USS Cerritos looks like a kitbashed model that we’d see on TNG; it doesn’t look like a joke because it’s a comedy.

The show is stupidly respectful of the franchise. I’ve ended both episodes with a big smile on my face. It’s a really fun show and turned out to be way better than I expected. And lastly; I never realized just how much I missed self-contained episodes.
 
The episode was fun but not as good as last week.

I thought the B plot with Rutherford was great.

leaving the General just passed out “on the porch” while they got away was great.
 
If Mariner entered the Academy at 16, possibly finishes it in three years thanks to living on starships and Starfleet installations, she’s probably a year older than the rest, so 24.

That gives her five years of being in Starfleet. Plenty of time for an interesting amount of things to have happened.

The other thing is, with both her parents being career Starfleet and, as mentioned, her spending most of her life on ships and starbases (plus I'd bet she was absolutely the kind of kid who got into everything) I imagine some of Mariner's "I have seen things!" experiences came from before she was ever even in Starfleet.
 
I like this. It's cute, fun, and it has some great Trek feels. I love all the little Easter eggs. There was a creature from TAS in the Andorian bar for Gods sake...!

I think the Rutherford plot was again my favorite, and I like how they kind of lampooned TNG-era Klingons as being stereotyped drunken Vikings.

7/10
 
I mean I would gladly talk about things I liked if I liked this show. Even if I didn't like the show, I'd give it credit if it did even one thing well.

Sure, I talk about "Things I like" all the time, but in a "lower decks" forum, I talk about "lower decks." Which is, at present, not a thing I like.
Seems like a waste of energy to me, why talk about or watch something you hate?

I hate Nemesis, so I don't watch it or respond to threads talking about.
 
If it wasn’t for the mum reveal you would think Beckett was a Q with all the deep references she knows.
 
Seems like a waste of energy to me, why talk about or watch something you hate?

I hate Nemesis, so I don't watch it or respond to threads talking about.

Because the show's brand new. I didn't know I was going to hate it, but it's now in the zeitgeist and I'm going to share my opinion about it in a discussion group that was created specifically for doing so.

I'm not spending any time in the VOY or Nemesis forums myself and I left the Picard forum a day or two after the last episode aired and won't be going back there, either.

How much of the show I end up watching or how long I remain in the forums remains to be seen. But since the show is current and I did see the episode, I'm going to discuss it.
 
I am a simple person, I love Andorians and I saw many of them that makes me love the episode :P

EfVJY3iXoAAaFa8
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top