Not quite so, I had the first 2 movies on VHS tapes by then, I watched them endlessly. They were $24.95 each and I asked my dad to get them for me for my birthday. The movies also ran on cable, so they were being revisited prior to Star Trek III's premiere.
Great point.

And, yeah, those first 2 are so easily rewatchable too...
Probably because of the more crowded sci-fi/fantasy landscape by then. Summer 1982 was chockablock with incredible choices:
Poltergeist
Star Trek II
E.T. (the week after TWOK - so there's your answer)
Blade Runner
The Thing
Tron
Great year for sci-fi movies, I must concede! TV shows were also there, most were just not memorable (or good)...
Compared to Star Trek The Motion Picture whose sole sci-fi competition in December was The Black Hole, three weeks later. It also had 10 years of hunger to feed off of. If it came out in the summer of 1979, it may have been a different result with Alien, Rocky II, The Amityville Horror, Moonraker and the re-release of Star Wars taking the young folks' movie ticket dollars.
Dang. Glad it came out when it had, then. And "The Black Hole", while imperfect, has a surprising level of horror that sets it apart. It too is a masterclass of a movie, as is TMP.
Yup that was it, it was the less "Trekkie" of the films. It was a heavy handed message comedy
TOS had some heavy handed episodes, so it makes sense that at least one of the movies would whip out the sledgehammer as well. I don't recall what TMP's heavy handed bit was (Kirk's obsessing?) but TVH definitely has a whale of a time in whaling it up about the whales. Everyone loved it, but everyone loved smoking too so either way I can't complain. Signed, a non-smoking Trekkie.
that was, like TMP, plot driven rather than character driven.
The one time that a plot-driven movie makes a comeback and it's a 2-hour sitcom.
Other than the 23rd century bookends, you didn't need to know a thing about the characters.
Which is a plus, especially for bringing in new audiences to get hooked on them before you do something big and epic like what had happened in the previous two films, which is what made TOS that much more epic in the first place.
And if the US prints had the same recap the overseas releases did, it wouldn't have been out of place to audiences.
Great point! I've to look up the international edition one day...
But Harve Bennett was quite skilled at working exposition into his dialog, so all you had to know was Spock died and the crew sacrificed their careers and their ship to save him. Everything else was Trek talk they just blew off and enjoyed the fun.
Admittedly, it was a very solid recap. The events of two movies rolled up into a handful of minutes. Great for the time to fill in the edited highlights, but the full experience and adventure of II and III were still no less mammoth in their own rights. I'd only hope that newbies in 1986 looked back, but even then there's nothing like the cinema. Which is usually good, but then you have to deal with sticky floors, dirty seats, talking people that causes sound pollution, people using their phones that causes light pollution, people doing it in the back seats that's distracting for a handful of reasons, etc.
I had one friend who had no interest in Star Trek, but his girlfriend made him go see it and he loved it. Then he saw "The Squire of Gothos" and loved how oddball Trek could be and suddenly he was a fan.
The best result.
"Gothos" is an interesting choice as well. It is oddball, and yet it hangs together so neatly.
Because Paramount didn't realize that it wasn't the jokes per se that people liked, it was the 23rd century (as you said) fish out of water situation. Star Trek V also didn't have a consistent tone. Star Trek IV kept most of the humor to the 20th century scenes. TFF had it everywhere, mixed with heady themes and tragic backstories. It was also steeped in Trek characters that general audiences didn't have an investment in. There's a good film in there somewhere, but too many cooks destroyed the dish.
^^this
Ehhhh, this was supposed to be a "darker" story but it was sabotaaged at every turn by really awful gags. Chekov being a borderline simpleton (he really takes a pounding in this movie), Uhura and the books, the Kirk loves himself meta humor, and the heavy handed Shakespeare quotes dilute what really should have been a nifty political thriller (the DC is even worse with the Scooby-Doo climax). I really mean to do an edit of this movie, removing the idiocy and seeing how it plays.
^^this!
As good as TUC is, the franchise never really ditched the gags until NEM, then forgot to make a compelling movie to go along with the darker tone. TWOK was compelling. NEM is just a big blob of empty indulgence.
I did like the Shakespeare "in the original Klingon" stuff, though. While it's riffing on the Chekov shtick from TOS, and yet it's not making the Klingons looks like doofuses in the way Chekov was treated as one in TOS. It's almost heavy-handed in a way, given some of Shakespeare's stories' themes, and yet it isn't.
After Star Trek III, none of the TOS films were allowed to take themselves seriously and the first 3 really feel like they were made for adults more than the rest.
^^this!!
That's the phraseology for sure. The films and franchise stopped taking itself seriously and it's not been the same. Even the TNG flicks never fully recovered from this "need".
I do remember griping in 1989 how TOS's movies were getting sillier while TNG was getting to take itself seriously. TNG definitely needed to. But so did TOS. The seriousness of the general content is another reason why the one-off comedic episodes hold up better. Make it all one farcical comedy routine one episode after the next and it won't be seen credibly as the audience, apart from being a joke.
None of these things, though, take away from my love of the first 6 movies. I still enjoyed TFF more than TVH and consider TSFS my all time favorite Trek movie (with TWOK and TMP directly behind).
Ditto. I-III are, IMHO, the platinum standard, but: TUC still has a lot in its favor, while I felt TFF was
okay at the time I adore it now because - jokiness aside - it captured the flavor and aura of TOS* as well as trying to find a big epic way to explore a strange new world and to seek out w new life form, with the deleted scenes adding desperately needed background context. TVH, in the right mindset, can be fun, but the humor is too much dated as it's a relic of 1986. But it's still not without its moments.
* Shatner nailed it, even if audiences didn't recognize it at the time because they were used to the serious element from I-III that had been ditched thanks to TVH's detour, and at least TUC remembered to put enough seriousness back in to satisfy that trait of the big screen Treks.
As I said, it was a lovely time to be alive.
Too true!