Which other eps of DSC and PIC has she written?People always praise her on the supposed strength of the Voyager novels, but her episodes come across as bad fanfic to me.
Which other eps of DSC and PIC has she written?People always praise her on the supposed strength of the Voyager novels, but her episodes come across as bad fanfic to me.
And pretty much every officer of note supported her.
None of the crew, not Burnham not Nilsson not Stamets not Detmer, has any apparent issue with Tilly in this job, so they must know something we don't to make this make more sense.
????? Isn't that true about every single Star Trek Episode that we have ever seen ????Because the script said so...?
Which other eps of DSC and PIC has she written?
To each their own. I disagree with your opinions on every single one of those episodes.DIS Season 1: Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
IMHO, the worst episode of the first season. The planet-side A-plot could have been good, if they had fixed a few issues (energy beings with yurts? And a giant crystal transmitter?) The B plot with Cornwell and L'Rell on the Ship of the Dead was totally incoherent though. I don't blame Beyer for this episode TBH, because I think poor direction choices and bad editing killed the story coherence. But it was still a low point in a bad season.
DIS Season 2: Saints of Imperfection
Tilly in the shroom-verse. I actually forgot she wrote this episode. Has the weird science-fantasy woo Discovery vibe of Berg-Harberts Trek, with the eye-rolling discussion of Culber's resurrected soul as "energy." There were some critical flaws in the episode, like the strange decision to tell a Tilly story from the POV of Burnham. And the Section 31 B-plot was basically useless. I remember the dialogue in this episode being awful though - a mixture of clunky exposition meant to tech the tech to plot the plot, and heavy Georgiou cattiness.
PIC Season 1: Stardust City Rag
Close to the low point of Picard's first season. A weird attempt at a comedic "heist/caper" episode ala DS9 bookended by two gruesome murders. Awful dialogue once again - a mixture of clunky infodumps and cornball melodrama. Small-universe syndrome out the whazoo. Felt completely unneeded at the time, and feels even moreso now that the season is over, since they just wanted an excuse to use Seven for something. The only thing that saved it was there were no scenes of Soji and Narek canoodling on the Artifact.
Indeed, yes. Culber's resurrection and Tilly's journey in the spore-verse was one of my favorite parts of Season 2.To each their own. I disagree with your opinions on every single one of those episodes.
????? Isn't that true about every single Star Trek Episode that we have ever seen ????
We don't get to decide what the show does.
We get to decide to watch it, or not. (period)
![]()
This thread is particularly bad for some reason, despite the high rating in the poll.
Most bizarre of all is seeing that some people are ranting that the episode is anti-Semitic because they equate Vulcans with Jews (which I’d never before heard in 30 years of being a Trek fan). Some people just go out of their way to hate things, and if they can’t find anything to hate they’ll make something up. It’s sad. Fans suck the joy out of things these days. Maybe they always did, I dunno.
Maybe it's because the Vulcan hand salute is borrowed from a Jewish prayer ceremony.
Maybe I’m just ignorant, but I don’t even remotely know how they are equated with Jews?
Is it because the Romulans were displaced and chose to share the ancestral home with the remaining Vulcans with some tensions between them?
I think perhaps that folks have forgotten that the Jewish angle that appeared in this discussion, came from a post about a complete 'Ice-hole' raging about his imagined Star Trek connections to real-world events that happened over 70 years ago.
It wasn't because any of us wanted to go there.
![]()
To each their own. I disagree with your opinions on every single one of those episodes.
exactly. again poor writing. they need to deal with this script realistically. one reason this episode is jarring is that the previous episodes this season HAVE dealt with the crew as actual persons with hurts and flaws and various qualities. Unification III turned them into a bunch of muppets.Because the script said so...?
????? Isn't that true about every single Star Trek Episode that we have ever seen ????
We don't get to decide what the show does.
We get to decide to watch it, or not. (period)
![]()
Here's my thing. I can make sense of it with few exceptions if I'm invested in the characters. Discovery hasn't failed me in that regard, even if writing was lack luster at times. I make connections even if the writers didn't intend them. Been doing that since TOS and ain't about to stop now.????? Isn't that true about every single Star Trek Episode that we have ever seen ????
We don't get to decide what the show does.
We get to decide to watch it, or not. (period)
![]()
Only if one has a problem with it to being with.Yes, we don't get to decide whether the show does something But we do get to decide whether the decisions of the show make a lick of sense or not.
If someone is arguing a Doylist position (something doesn't make sense as the author has written it) you do not respond back with a Watsonian argument (the story says there's no problem, so there's no problem).
exactly. again poor writing. they need to deal with this script realistically. one reason this episode is jarring is that the previous episodes this season HAVE dealt with the crew as actual persons with hurts and flaws and various qualities. Unification III turned them into a bunch of muppets.
Now we know why no one saw him in a relationship before. Dude aims high.Saru's got some game!)
Only if one has a problem with it to being with.
I don't have a problem with it.
I'm not watching the show to evaluate every single decision the writers make.
I'm watching it to enjoy where they decide to take the characters and the final results the writers chose to make.
You hyper-realist evaluations essentially destroy any joy that might come from just going along for the ride.
That of course is your option, but it seems to me like a whole lot of wasted time and energy over something that none of us have a say in.
![]()
Internet Morons' Dumbass Bitching?I wouldn't use IMDb reviews as a reflection of the "general public". It's a very small portion of the audience which rates an episode on IMDb, and an even smaller portion which goes on to write a review.
A substantial portion of the written IMDb reviews for each Disco episode are negative, even the episodes which have high overall ratings. It's mostly a core of hate-watchers (or non-watchers) who rush to bash each episode.
Just have a look at the Forget Me Not reviews as an example - a substantial portion of them (a third when I looked soon after the episode) were transphobic, and many had little to do with the episode itself.
I find it much better here than elsewhere for the most part, though that may be due to my ignore list. I've stopped discussing it on Reddit because of the constant negativity. It's one thing to dislike portions of a show - I had issues with this episode - but it gets tedious when it's the same people just constantly hating on the show.
Only if one has a problem with it to being with.
I don't have a problem with it.
I'm not watching the show to evaluate every single decision the writers make.
I'm watching it to enjoy where they decide to take the characters and the final results the writers chose to make.
You hyper-realist evaluations essentially destroy any joy that might come from just going along for the ride.
That of course is your option, but it seems to me like a whole lot of wasted time and energy over something that none of us have a say in.
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.