I know but I’m just showing an example on how their world differs to ours.Clearly it hasn't
I know but I’m just showing an example on how their world differs to ours.Clearly it hasn't
Calypso was not written by Berg/Harberts. It was mostly written by Michael Chabon (now writing for the Picard show) with some story input by Sean Cochran (who wrote Despite Yourself in the first season, but apparently is no longer part of Discovery's writing staff).
bashir was kind of a history reenactment nut
I know but I’m just showing an example on how their world differs to ours.
Good episode that but they should have done more to differentiate it from ours. Have a Eugenics War reference or something.Their nineties changed when we reached it (see Voyager) and because our nineties. The way Star Trek looks not to mention its past has never been etched in stone.
So you think tech won't improve in 200 years?They did cars with touchscreen controls. They realised how terrible they were and brought back physical ones.
https://www.slashgear.com/ford-bringing-back-buttons-after-touchscreen-distraction-fears-17286673/
So you think tech won't improve in 200 years?
Yes and no. If it's mentioned on screen, then it is canon.
However, something that is not mentioned onscreen does not mean that canon tells us it didn't happen. Please excuse the use of the multiple negatives.
If a certain thing was never mentioned on screen -- for example, Scotty never mentioned siblings -- the idea that Scotty DOES have siblings is fair game. Until we find out onscreen if he has siblings or not, then canon could be said to be completely silent on the issue.
Just because he didn't mention siblings doesn't mean he has none -- although he might have none.
I don't believe they hired Rebecca Romijn for the five minutes of screen time she's had so far. Or credited a random extra as Yeoman Colt just to impress some geeks. Or built that massive bridge for two episodes. Or introduced a second engineer to the series for the hell of it. Or established that Culber's moving to the Enterprise next season because they don't want Wilson Cruz on the show anymore.
Canonically, Spock and Sarek aren't speaking at this point.I was disappointed to not see any scene between spock , sarek and amanda.
the michael burnham importance is just getting too far, this is almost as bad as when leia hugged rey in the force awakens and ignored chewie for no darm reason
Did anyone care about any of their scenes together?
He just needs to wear such a suit each time he does a simulation with cadets.
- They found a time to describe a time-travel suit, which looks like common clothes but protects his owner from all the types of radiation? Why Pike couldn't wear one all the time?
I might be only saying this because I'm a Burnham/Tilly shipper and shippers tend to see subtext in everything, but seriously, the scene where Tilly appeared to say goodbye to Burnham before taking her outside to tell her they had all decided to follow her had a more romantic vibe for me than the entirety of the Burnham/Tyler relationship. But then again, as I've said in the thread for Project Daedalus, the friendship of Tilly and Airiam had more chemistry in the span of a single episode than Burnham and Tyler through all two seasons.Burnham/Tyler? The Internet is ablaze with fans wanting to see these two star-crossed lovers finally come together!
But seriously, no. No one cares. You are not alone in how hollow it seems.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.