I saw someone complaining that Spock shouldn’t have understood Michael’s line “How’s that beard working for you?”
They felt it was too ‘slangy’
Then they can take him stroking his beard as a reaction of puzzlement at the non sequitur.
I saw someone complaining that Spock shouldn’t have understood Michael’s line “How’s that beard working for you?”
They felt it was too ‘slangy’
Just finished a rewatch and had a similar thought.The quid pro quo by the Talosians made Silence of the Lambs flash through my mind during a second viewing...
Have they never seen a Star Trek episode with Spock before?I saw someone complaining that Spock shouldn’t have understood Michael’s line “How’s that beard working for you?”
They felt it was too ‘slangy’
I've been thinking that for a couple of weeks now. Whoever it is has Majel's cadence down pat. The only way they could have done better is if they got Rebecca Romijn to be the voice of the computer.That computer voice would make Majel proud...
didn't the timeline get altered by the Red Angel visiting Spock and warning him of Michael's death?
Discovery is clearly in the prime universe, but the question is whether the timeline we know and love happened with or without Red Angel intervention.
If it happened without Red Angel intervention, it means Michael Burnham died as a child, and anything she does in the story possibly changes the future. Which not only has far reaching implications, it implies the Red Angel saved Michael Burnham specifically because it thought she would do something to achieve its positive or negative ends, that did not originally happen.
That would go with novel canon since there they mention that her voice was used for Starfleet’s computer.I've been thinking that for a couple of weeks now. Whoever it is has Majel's cadence down pat. The only way they could have done better is if they got Rebecca Romijn to be the voice of the computer.![]()
That would go with novel canon since there they mention that her voice was used for Starfleet’s computer.
The Rift by Peter David...have read only a handful of ST novels but never knew that tidbit.
I felt the same way. It did feel a bit jarring to cut away to Culber but they had to address his issues. And the episode title could relate to this side plot as well.The B plot is kinda dragging the episode. I am much more interested in Spock and Michael on Talos IV.
Nope.Not disagreeing, but Kirk & Joan Collins?
Really? I thought it was from Legacies.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.