I'm recording my impressions of the character.
They wrote that character henpecking at Spock in typical style and that as prominent as she got. The main trio got prominent and dynamic roles in this film. I've no personal objections to making Uhura more prominent if that's what it is upsetting you about my post. But nuUhura isn't particularly prominent in these films and if you're seeing something else then I think you've been watching a different brace of films than I watched!
aren't you being contradictory? in one breath, you admit you are talking about your impression (meaning personal and subjected to your own, possible, biases) but then you make it seems this is how the writers objectively wrote it and anyone seeing things differently had watched another movie.
If you think Uhura didn't get a more prominent role than tos Uhura did AND the secondary male characters in these movies did, even though the writers themselves said that, showed that and the media kind of collectively recognized that since 2009, I don't know what to tell you. I surely don't want to make a list of all the things Uhura did in these movies because, frankly, I'm sick and tired of having this argument and the fact itself that people have to constantly 'remind' some people this stuff, all the while the same people overrate the dudes' contribution to the plot, makes this point moot and a loss of time because it's obvious that people's selective memory about Uhura has little to do with what is 'written' and so called 'objectivity'.
and I don't know what you refer to with 'The main trio got prominent and dynamic roles in this film', what main trio? Kirk, Spock, Bones? because if that is the case then, again, gotta disagree here. I don't see where McCoy's role had been more prominent and dynamic than Uhura's - and surely if it were, I think many of the tos purists wouldn't complain that 1) they saw too little of him 2) Uhura 'replaced' him in the trio. In terms of the main guys, Uhura is basically Spock's friend/girlfriend while McCoy is mostly Kirk's friend.
I understood it ages ago that some fans project tos over the reboot (and this, in my opinion, is the biggest problem this fandom has) but I'm afraid I don't have that same amount of suspension of disbelief some have (and yes, even some interviewers) and I can't pretend that these characters have the same exact dynamics when objectively they do not. I'm not going to just pretend that in these movies Spock and Bones are Kirk's yin and yang and developed like that when, if anything, they changed Kirk and Spock to the extent they don't even have the same dynamic with each other, let alone have those supposed roles that fanon attributes to the 'holy trinity' characters. I see no id, ego and supergo here. (and maybe, just maybe, I like the reboot precisely because it's not too stuck with those supposed roles characters must have according to some people in the fandom)