• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek 2009-11 years later

Status
Not open for further replies.
We’ll have to disagree. I believe Spock gave her the whole green Vulcan roll. He just had no open physical feelings for her.

Totally disagree: from what I gather it’s wasn't much unlike Spock’s relationship with Chapel, as much as she would have liked it there was no way Spock would go much further than being colleagues.
 
Totally disagree: from what I gather it’s wasn't much unlike Spock’s relationship with Chapel, as much as she would have liked it there was no way Spock would go much further than being colleagues.

Where that we’ll have to agree to disagree comes in. :p
 
This might just be my favourite Star Trek movie (also my first!). It isn't without it's issues but I love it so much that it's among my favourite movies of all time!

It was a breath of fresh air for the franchise in 2009. Spectacular, funny with a very neat premise to keep it tied to what came before whilst giving it the freedom to do it's own thing. I think it's a flawed but fantastic movie.

It still annoys me to this day how they dropped the ball afterwards though (though I like STID and STB every bit as much).

What a wasted opportunity.
 
Kirk's a jerk...:shifty:
Note to Cryo: That's a TAS reference

The trailer though, even 11 years on is still one of the best in the last 20 years. Hell, it's an all-time great trailer.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
They took out "On May 8th" but kept the black screen and blue line XD
This one (trailer 3) even got an award, IIRC

One other thing on '09, if only Paramount and CBS would pony up about $30 million dollars an episode and do a TV series that looked like Star Trek '09.
Maybe next lifetime.
Disco looks very Kelvinized

For the mods and the wider record:

Trolling comments that begin with the first reply above (Post #2) are are a crystal-clear allusion to an exchange in the following thread that begins around here:

https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/the-undiscovered-country.305323/page-3#post-13510461

I'm being publicly maligned for my opinions on the Star Trek 2009 film, given in a separate location (as above -- runs for several pages), after I was encouraged to acknowledge this new thread and reassured it was for the purposes of genuine conversation. Unfortunately, this is hardly something new with adherents of the Abramsverse.

The other thread was becoming derailed and this one was set up to supposedly remedy that situation. But as you can see, it's just a troll tactic to shame me and mock ST 09 critics in advance. I am not against people having fun, but the well has been poisoned here; and now the new thread starter is denying his role in that process.
Calm down, it's not worth it. :beer:
How old are you, roughly?

-the plot makes no sense whatsoever
Most of it makes sense, the rest is no less sensical than the other movies XD

Yes: in TOS there was no indication this could have ever been a thing. It’s obvious they did it to give Zoe Saldana something more to do, but it really came out of the blue and, for me, didn’t work with where Spock was supposed to be in his life.
Fair enough, though there is a flirtatious look Spock gives Uhura while playing his Vulcan harp. I'm guessing (don't have any evidence) that this was the reason given for the relationship.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

I saw it four times at the theater, numerous times on Blu-ray in the intervening years.
I ended up seeing it 9 times in theaters - different languages, and different people wanted to go see it over months and months IIRC

My inner Trekkie rebelled at the idea of the Enterprise being built on the ground. At that same time, building something like it on the ground shouldn’t really be a problem for a society that has mastered matter, energy and gravity.

So I continue to be torn on the idea.
Galaxy parts are on the Utopia Planitia ground facilities in TNG
 
This is one that I always struggled to understand. Is there a reason why it was so off putting?

Yeah; I agree with all your other points (especially the mess of science and plot), but I was fine with this.

At that point, Spock is supposed to be engaged with T’Pring and it isn’t even public knowledge that he’s half human (Kirk thinks he has “a human ancestor”), why would he have a human girlfriend?

Alternate timeline: we don't know about T'Pring (I'm trying to remember if they address it in the comics). Also, the human ancestor line always struck me as just pilot episode awkwardness. It's certainly public knowledge by Corbomite Maneuver (clearly the next episode chronologically), and a mother is technically an ancestor.

Totally disagree: from what I gather it’s wasn't much unlike Spock’s relationship with Chapel, as much as she would have liked it there was no way Spock would go much further than being colleagues.

Same here, and the novel Inception certainly agrees with us.
 
This version of Spock is debating how Vulcan he wants to be. Prime Spock is all in, Movie Spock is more nuanced.

Or it's possible, just possible, Spock and T'Prynn don't see their engagement as binding until marriage.

Uhura and Spock may see their relationship only lasting through the Academy due to the same reasons people in RL date in college with the knowledge they will move away later.
 
I don't just remember the movie I remember following the news on it day by day since the JJ announcement in 2006!

From the casting, filming, rumours etc to the actual film, I still have a great nostalgia for it!
 
Spock having a romance seems out of character for someone whose reason as a character is as suppressor-of-emotion and outsider/commenter on the human condition. The point is to represent the Apollonian, even though, brilliantly in TOS and the movies, he struggled with it and ultimately rejected its strict adherence. (What a great character arc, as he developed from shouty to cold to integrated.)

But even in ST V and VI when he's out back together, he's still primarily the logic/reason character.

To have him acting like a college kid with his girlfriend: meh.

Also, Uhura was mainly elevated . . . to be Spock's girlfriend. Then dropped in Beyond. She was almost a full person in STID dealing with the Klingons for a moment iirc.

Many things about the movie (back to 09) smacked of immaturity on the part of the filmmakers. Have Kirk listen to Beastie Boys! Show Spock and Uhura making out! Kirk is an immature jerk! He does green women! Kewl.

Now, are all these things possuble/plausible? Yup. But in the totality, I got the sense of someone who keep throwing things in just for the sake of being provocative, which is at heart, immaturity. Nero addressing Pike informally as "Christopher"! That was the moment in the theater that took me out.

Is it plausible/possible? Sure. It just seemed like a filmmaker pointing to himself by inverting a Trek trope (formality) and being cool by doing the informality which is the order of our day.

Oddly, JJ made very, very (too) orthodox SW films. Imho, of course.
 
The ARG was also outstanding

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Spock having a romance seems out of character for someone whose reason as a character is as suppressor-of-emotion and outsider/commenter on the human condition. The point is to represent the Apollonian, even though, brilliantly in TOS and the movies, he struggled with it and ultimately rejected its strict adherence. (What a great character arc, as he developed from shouty to cold to integrated.)

But even in ST V and VI when he's out back together, he's still primarily the logic/reason character.

To have him acting like a college kid with his girlfriend: meh.

Also, Uhura was mainly elevated . . . to be Spock's girlfriend. Then dropped in Beyond. She was almost a full person in STID dealing with the Klingons for a moment iirc.

Many things about the movie (back to 09) smacked of immaturity on the part of the filmmakers. Have Kirk listen to Beastie Boys! Show Spock and Uhura making out! Kirk is an immature jerk! He does green women! Kewl.

Now, are all these things possuble/plausible? Yup. But in the totality, I got the sense of someone who keep throwing things in just for the sake of being provocative, which is at heart, immaturity. Nero addressing Pike informally as "Christopher"! That was the moment in the theater that took me out.

Is it plausible/possible? Sure. It just seemed like a filmmaker pointing to himself by inverting a Trek trope (formality) and being cool by doing the informality which is the order of our day.

Oddly, JJ made very, very (too) orthodox SW films. Imho, of course.

Agreed with everything, but I liked that detail of Nero: it showed he was not your regular Romulan admiral, only some angry ignorant idiot that thinks too much of himself, can’t come up with half a plan and only makes things worse for everyone.

That was the idea, right? Right?!

Heck he probably just had himself tattooed without knowing what it meant and his forehead read “hot chili” in ferengi.
 
Last edited:
Agreed with everything, but I liked that detail of Nero: it showed he was not your regular Romulan admiral, only some angry ignorant idiot that thinks too much of himself, can’t come up with half a plan and only makes things worse for everyone.

That was the idea, right? Right?!

Heck he probably just had himself tattooed without knowing what it meant and his forehead read “hot chili” in ferengi.

Well he literally is just a space trucker. That was actually deliberate. After years of crafty Romulans and generals, he's just an angry Redneck.

It's why I hated trying to say his ship was Borg technology or he was the head of the Mining Guild.
 
Agreed with everything, but I liked that detail of Nero: it showed he was not your regular Romulan admiral, only some angry ignorant idiot that thinks too much of himself, can’t come up with half a plan and only makes things worse for everyone.
That was my impression and why Nero is among my favorite villains. He isn't a super genius, or an advanced AI but a regular guy, someone who has suffered intense pain and witness tragedy and loss on a scale that few of the characters he encounters will understand. And, it goes to the theme of emotions running deep in the Vulcan and Romulan race, and just how destructive that can be.

I also wanted to share a video that usually gets a lot of play (either for or against the film) in CinemaSins. I chuckle a bit during their reviews, but also find some of their interpretations lacking. Curious for thoughts and if anyone else use to watch them.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top