• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek 2009-11 years later

Status
Not open for further replies.
Technically correct. The best kind.

I would imagine that the point was year to year, not month to month.

Yes, he should have. He wasn't that kind of leader yet. Kind of the point of the whole second movie.
NuKirk was not a child, and should have learned discipline during his years at the academy. That would have included leaving personal affairs to off-duty time whether you're in that specific situation or not. I do not excuse him for it He should have known better, and NuSpock should have known better as well.

NuUhura would be slow to receive any more promotions if I were running that ship.
 
NuKirk was not a child, and should have learned discipline during his years at the academy. That would have included leaving personal affairs to off-duty time whether you're in that specific situation or not. I do not excuse him for it He should have known better, and NuSpock should have known better as well.

NuUhura would be slow to receive any more promotions if I were running that ship.
Even if you learn that and discipline even the most disciplined are going to make mistakes.
 
Even if you learn that and discipline even the most disciplined are going to make mistakes.
Even such mistakes as basically telling the captain to shut up while she finished haranguing her boyfriend?

I've never served in any RL military, but would a RL captain take that from a subordinate?
 
Even such mistakes as basically telling the captain to shut up while she finished haranguing her boyfriend?

I've never served in any RL military, but would a RL captain take that from a subordinate?
I have not served in the military either so I do not know. I have certainly talked back to my manager in a rather disrespectful tone and worked through that with him. But, he was an experienced manager and knew what to do. The whole point of ID is that Kirk is not at that leadership level yet. He thinks he is; and his conversation with Pike is very illustrative of that fact. He assumes that because he hasn't gotten anyone killed, that he inspires loyalty and camaraderie amongst his crew, those facts makes him a good leader, and that should be enough. Except it isn't. And that's the movie.
 
I'm looking forward to every show equally. I'm a rare and endangered trek fan.
Yes, even Prodigy, 'cause I'm a kid inside :razz:

Even such mistakes as basically telling the captain to shut up while she finished haranguing her boyfriend?

I've never served in any RL military, but would a RL captain take that from a subordinate?

I suppose it has to be remembered that the system on a Star Trek ship is quasi-military and not directly analogous to the military of today. Scientists, not soldiers. There's plenty of examples from TOS onwards of personnel stepping out of line and getting away with it. How much Starfleet adheres to a strict military code is one of those things that varies between episodes. Plus, the crew of the Enterprise at this point are all raw-rookies. Some 'ironing out of the kinks' has to go on I guess.
 
I suppose it has to be remembered that the system on a Star Trek ship is quasi-military and not directly analogous to the military of today. Scientists, not soldiers. There's plenty of examples from TOS onwards of personnel stepping out of line and getting away with it. How much Starfleet adheres to a strict military code is one of those things that varies between episodes. Plus, the crew of the Enterprise at this point are all raw-rookies. Some 'ironing out of the kinks' has to go on I guess.
So if nuKirk was in charge of a science lab and nuUhura felt the need to nag her boyfriend, it should be okay to do that during a shift when critical things were going on and nobody would tell them to keep it for off-hours?

Seriously, wouldn't NuKirk have learned ANYTHING about leadership during his Starfleet Academy years?

Even Wesley or Harry would know more than that!
 
That "the inmates are running the asylum" vibe of ST'09 and ID where everyone's young and inexperienced and they're all just winging it, is one of my favourite things about those movies.

I respect your opinion.

I can't stand that about these films. But I am of a different era. The TOS ENT was staffed by fully-formed grown ups. (Made by people who were adults in WWII.)

I don't like the feelz/emo-ness of current culture. We are all siblings now, as opposed to becoming grownups. It's just how I roll. I really didn't want to get into it in a DSC thread, but -- iirc, and I'm not sure I do -- in the last ep there was a group hug scene and Tilly? said, "I love you guys."

Yuk. If you're me.

If not, then as always, like what you like!

(Though ... maybe... the movies are implying you need the grownups around to really run things well (Pike and Sarek)?
 
So if nuKirk was in charge of a science lab and nuUhura felt the need to nag her boyfriend, it should be okay to do that during a shift when critical things were going on and nobody would tell them to keep it for off-hours?

I guess so 'cause that's what happens. Do we go to Star Trek movies for realism or drama?

Seriously, wouldn't NuKirk have learned ANYTHING about leadership during his Starfleet Academy years?

I think training in any field teaches about tasks in the abstract. Speaking as a lecturer with over ten years experience, no training prepared me for the crap that all too often goes down in a classroom. There must be a difference between learning about commanding a spaceship and actually doing it. Plus youth, hormones and an unusual interspecies relationship going off the boil... it seems reasonable to me dramatically speaking.

In terms of logic? It's a movie about a giant octopus spaceship that time travels in time to avert the destruction of an entire planet, that can destroy planets, with two actors playing the same character from different universes and every other significant role from TOS recast.

A lovers tiff seems pedestrian in comparison.
 
It's a movie about a giant octopus spaceship that time travels in time to avert the destruction of an entire plane
you wish. They time travel by error after trying to exact revenge because their planet has been destroyed, could prevent such destruction but instead do nothing for decades, then go on revenge rampage instead. Eventually they end up in the same kind of anomaly that caused them to time travel in the first place but instead of time travel again they are just crushed for no. Reason. At. All.

And what I wrote isn’t even among the most absurd parts of the movie.
 
Good for you, but there is hardly any hint there that the Romulans have been held captive for decades, conveniently close to their ship, and just escaped in time to intercept Spock.
 
Good for you, but there is hardly any hint there that the Romulans have been held captive for decades, conveniently close to their ship, and just escaped in time to intercept Spock.
Aside from the attack on the Klingon prison planet.

And even so, why bother destroying earth and Vulcan? Why there’s isn’t any hint of any kind of plan to save Romulus?
Because Nero is insane. You are applying logical thinking to someone who has been deeply traumatized, and has had a psychotic break from reality. To Nero, as he says, the only way for Romulus to be safe is to eliminate the Federation who failed to save Romulus.

Is it logical? Nope. But it is where Nero is at psychologically.
 
I suppose it has to be remembered that the system on a Star Trek ship is quasi-military and not directly analogous to the military of today. Scientists, not soldiers. There's plenty of examples from TOS onwards of personnel stepping out of line and getting away with it. How much Starfleet adheres to a strict military code is one of those things that varies between episodes. Plus, the crew of the Enterprise at this point are all raw-rookies. Some 'ironing out of the kinks' has to go on I guess.
Exactly so. There is a different style of discipline than necessarily would be expected at a military academy.
Seriously, wouldn't NuKirk have learned ANYTHING about leadership during his Starfleet Academy years?
Learned it? Sure. Know how to apply it? No, which is why Pike is completely right at the beginning of the film; Kirk is not ready for the center seat. Kirk has a very different attitude towards leadership, primarily driven by the fact that he believes that by not getting anyone killed he is a good leader. But, leadership comes from experience, not just training.
I think training in any field teaches about tasks in the abstract. Speaking as a lecturer with over ten years experience, no training prepared me for the crap that all too often goes down in a classroom. There must be a difference between learning about commanding a spaceship and actually doing it. Plus youth, hormones and an unusual interspecies relationship going off the boil... it seems reasonable to me dramatically speaking.
Exactly. Most of the time, when I was an assistant manager, the problems that came up were not stuff that was touched on in trainings and seminars. Certainly the knowledge could help but from time to time it came down to experience, confidence and ability as much as knowledge about procedure.'

Also, the whole point of 09 and ID is how Kirk becomes a great leader and it wasn't because he was born great or born a genius.

Though ... maybe... the movies are implying you need the grownups around to really run things well (Pike and Sarek
I don't think it's implying. I think that is the point of the film.
 
you wish. They time travel by error after trying to exact revenge because their planet has been destroyed, could prevent such destruction but instead do nothing for decades, then go on revenge rampage instead. Eventually they end up in the same kind of anomaly that caused them to time travel in the first place but instead of time travel again they are just crushed for no. Reason. At. All.

And what I wrote isn’t even among the most absurd parts of the movie.

It's been a long long while since I saw it. But my point stands. The fact an officer publicly kicks off at her boyfriend (also an officer) in front of another officer does not cause me to suspend my disbelief, especially not weighed against the reality presented within the context of the movie, or indeed that of the larger Star Trek universe from whence it sprang.
 
I guess so 'cause that's what happens. Do we go to Star Trek movies for realism or drama?
Hopefully some degree of both. When the "drama" ruins the suspension of disbelief, that's not a good thing.

I think training in any field teaches about tasks in the abstract. Speaking as a lecturer with over ten years experience, no training prepared me for the crap that all too often goes down in a classroom. There must be a difference between learning about commanding a spaceship and actually doing it. Plus youth, hormones and an unusual interspecies relationship going off the boil... it seems reasonable to me dramatically speaking.
So you were never thrown into any sort of practicum during your time of learning how to be a lecturer? You don't say whether you teach in a university, or in a school, but even during my first year of a B.Ed. degree I was thrown into a real classroom with real kids for a minimum of 6 half-days (most of us did more) as an early way of seeing if I could handle it.

This practicum time increases each year of the program. So by the time the student teacher becomes the teacher, they should know something about leadership. And yes, I know people can still throw you for a loop, but what does that say about NuKirk's Academy instructors if he turns out to be such a weak leader that he lets his communications officer order him around on his own ship so she can conduct personal affairs in the middle of a critical mission? He should already have learned how to shut that sort of thing down.

If you recall, Chekov was chastised for conducting personal business during a mission in an episode or two...

In terms of logic? It's a movie about a giant octopus spaceship that time travels in time to avert the destruction of an entire planet, that can destroy planets, with two actors playing the same character from different universes and every other significant role from TOS recast.
Thanks for explaining. To me it seemed like a mess of hammy actors (exception: Leonard Nimoy) spouting a series of one-liners as CGI stuff happens at a rate too fast to process, which resulted in the kind of sensory overload that makes me not want to watch anymore.

A lovers tiff seems pedestrian in comparison.
It's not that they had their "tiff." It's that they had it on-duty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top