From what I've heard around here, the special edition you refer to will never be released on BluRay.
Wrong.
The images are tons better, but they are also kinda off in some way. I looked at them last night and again this morning, and I'm wondering if they applied that grain erasure algorithm to TMP, like they did to PATTON. It seems like there is some texture missing from the image, which has been described as eliminating detail at one level, while accentuating detail in others.
Reason I say this is that photographic frame blowups from TMP didn't look this bright and sharp on the edges, and they should have.
I'm really intrigued, as I'm sure they didn't actually do any hands-on work to the film this early in its bluray history.
The images are tons better, but they are also kinda off in some way. I looked at them last night and again this morning, and I'm wondering if they applied that grain erasure algorithm to TMP, like they did to PATTON. It seems like there is some texture missing from the image, which has been described as eliminating detail at one level, while accentuating detail in others.
Reason I say this is that photographic frame blowups from TMP didn't look this bright and sharp on the edges, and they should have.
I'm really intrigued, as I'm sure they didn't actually do any hands-on work to the film this early in its bluray history.
I've been reading some fan reviews on other fora, and that's what folks are saying. The DNR and EE, to them, seems obvious, and has removed detail, leaving a waxy look. So, we can live w/ our DVDs (which I've already sold off), or live w/ BDs that are better than DVD, but not as good as they could be.
I'm reserving judgment until I receive my set.
Doug
The images are tons better, but they are also kinda off in some way. I looked at them last night and again this morning, and I'm wondering if they applied that grain erasure algorithm to TMP, like they did to PATTON. It seems like there is some texture missing from the image, which has been described as eliminating detail at one level, while accentuating detail in others.
Reason I say this is that photographic frame blowups from TMP didn't look this bright and sharp on the edges, and they should have.
I'm really intrigued, as I'm sure they didn't actually do any hands-on work to the film this early in its bluray history.
I've been reading some fan reviews on other fora, and that's what folks are saying. The DNR and EE, to them, seems obvious, and has removed detail, leaving a waxy look. So, we can live w/ our DVDs (which I've already sold off), or live w/ BDs that are better than DVD, but not as good as they could be.
I'm reserving judgment until I receive my set.
Doug
I've read that, too. I've actually read a few different opinions. Some saying EE/DNR on only some movies (TMP and TUC seem to be the culprits, some say TVH and TUC, etc.), some saying it affects all the films, etc. I will be holding onto my DVDs until I see the Blu-Rays myself. And even then, I'll still hold on to TMP, TWOK, and TUC (for the different versions).
Should I be ashamed that I had no idea TMP was going to be on BluRay? Compared to how fucking terrible the DVD looks, I have no qualms about purchasing this for BD off the bat (along with the TOS ones, as my first two BDs)
How is the sound elton?
EDIT: My god, this is the year of Star Trek, for almost everybody. The hard core guys get goregous BD sets for TOS (with both versions) and TMP, and everyone else gets a new movie.
Not to belabor this, but comparing this screencap with the similar one on trekcore, the deflector dish is oddly colorless in the new version, neither yellow (as it always was) or blue (which is how it is at highpower.)
Not to belabor this, but comparing this screencap with the similar one on trekcore, the deflector dish is oddly colorless in the new version, neither yellow (as it always was) or blue (which is how it is at highpower.)
I see very little difference in the actual shade of color. If anything the vibrancy and contrast of the new version is even more apparent. (image from Trekcore)
![]()
Not to belabor this, but comparing this screencap with the similar one on trekcore, the deflector dish is oddly colorless in the new version, neither yellow (as it always was) or blue (which is how it is at highpower.)
I see very little difference in the actual shade of color. If anything the vibrancy and contrast of the new version is even more apparent. (image from Trekcore)
![]()
Maybe it is because I'm colorblind, but when I compare the two, one is yellow (trekcore) and the other is practically the same color as the hull.
The midtones are brighter on the BluRay cap, that's for sure. But I'd say the saturation of the color is about the same.
trevnian, when you say "colorblind," are you making a wisecrack or do you literally mean red-green colorblind? Because if the latter, I can see how the different grayscale values between the images might be throwing off your sense of what color it is.
If not, just ignore me.![]()
The problem is, the SLV doesn't just need cleanup; it would need effects work. The boat for that happening sailed with the Director's Edition.I'd still like to see the SLV cleaned up and put on DVD or BlueRay (I don't have such a player.........yet.)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.