I'm not sure I indicated that there should only be 1 person aboard with the rank of Commander. If I did, it wasn't intentional. My reference to Giotto was instead meant to point out another instance where a character is addressed out loud as "Lieutenant Commander" but wears braids indicating full Commander's rank.Why is it considered a production error? The practice of frocking adequately accounts for any supposed discrepancy in Spock's rank. There is no reason Giotto couldn't have been a full Commander, either. Why must there be only one person aboard with that rank?
That's a good point. I suppose it's entirely possible that it found its way into a script here or there and was, possibly, even shot and then left on the cutting room floor because it didn't add anything to the story. The Corbomite Maneuver comes to mind - it was stated in that episode that Kirk promoted Bailey. Who knows?While frocking is never discussed in the series, it's never relevant to the plot either.
Aren't we all supposed to just pretend that WNMHGB never really happened? I mean it was a dress rehearsal (a pilot) to sell the series and was never really meant to be part of the canon.
Why is it considered a production error? The practice of frocking adequately accounts for any supposed discrepancy in Spock's rank. There is no reason Giotto couldn't have been a full Commander, either. Why must there be only one person aboard with that rank?
"Tomorrow is Yesterday" is near-impossible to explain away, unless we assume Kirk was having a momentary lapse of concentration due to the trauma of time travel.And if Giotto was a similar case, why wouldn't Kirk call him simply "commander?"
In "Court Martial", the Records Officer appeared to be a top computer operator, by skill and access. Kirk apparently equaled him in access, while Spock most probably also enjoyed an advantage in skill. But it wouldn't be difficult to assume that Spock's promotion to combined XO and SO status would necessitate taking some computer-related burden off him and giving it to another guy, in this case Finney. The two acting promotions would be related, then.And why would Finney, with the infamous black mark on his record, be bumped up to full commander to serve as records officer, while the ship's chief engineer and apparent third-in-command is only a LCDR?
But "Devil in the Dark" isn't that difficult to fit into the picture, because Kirk could more easily fail to remember the recent promotion of an officer he doesn't daily interact with.
In "Court Martial", the Records Officer appeared to be a top computer operator, by skill and access. Kirk apparently equaled him in access, while Spock most probably also enjoyed an advantage in skill. But it wouldn't be difficult to assume that Spock's promotion to combined XO and SO status would necessitate taking some computer-related burden off him and giving it to another guy, in this case Finney. The two acting promotions would be related, then.
Kirk should be able to remember who they are, plus the stripes are there as a reminder.
...records officer is apparently pretty non-essential (we never hear of one again, do we?).
And it still wouldn't explain why they always call him "lieutenant commander."
Well, that's actually why I started this thread. I know there are a lot of posts to sift through so I'll try to summarize the best I can: I noticed that Spock is referred to as Lieutenant Commander early in the series, yet he wears the 2 solid gold braids of a full Commander.spock is same rank as mccoy & scotty isnt he? which was lieutenant commander
After much speculation by members who posted here, it seems most likely that the producers just screwed up...and more than once actually, as the character of Giotto in The Devil in the Dark also wears 2 solid braids.
Not even close. Brevetting would enabled a officer to hold a higher rank temporarily, for a special purpose. During the time period that they held that temporary rank, the officer would have the full authority of that rank.Brevet promotion: A promotion given as an honor for valiant or outstanding service, but with little or no real authority. Died out by the 20th century.
Not even close. Brevetting would enabled a officer to hold a higher rank temporarily, for a special purpose. During the time period that they held that temporary rank, the officer would have the full authority of that rank.
While it became less common in the twentieth century during peacetime, it hardly "died out." The practice would become common again during both the first and second world wars.
There have been brevetments (sp?) in the USAF as recently as 2005.
^ The incident referred to in 2005 was frocking, not brevetting. Although the waters are muddied somewhat if you read sources like Wikipedia, because they treat brevetting and frocking as basically the same thing and use the terms interchangeably, even though they are quite different.
Heinlain's Space Cadet stories were an influence on Roddenberry, so there's that...
Not to throw a monkey wrench into the works but Kirk does refer to him as Science Officer in WNMHGB. More CDST I suppose. eh?
We know two things for sure from Where No Man...:
* Spock is identified as 'science officer' by Kirk.
* Only two people have the 'star' symbol on their insignia patches, Kirk and Spock. They also both are wearing the same color tunics.
Now we see Spock stay behind after the staff meeting and consult with Kirk about an appropriate course of action, suggesting they either maroon or kill Mitchell.
I use to think that it was Mitchell who was XO in the episode, but after reviewing it lately I've changed my mind.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.