I don't see it.Common sense contradicts it.
I don't see it.Common sense contradicts it.
I don't see it.
Dude, you're becoming that type of fan. Wild flights of hyperbolic fancy.Season three: Spock has six kids by six different women. The Prime crowd: "Well, there's nothing there that prevents it!!!"
What's implausible about a war between the Federation and the Klingons?Maybe not in the most utterly technical sense, but in terms of plausibility....it sure bends that over backwards.
Here is something that might be worth considering:
Kirk is not a self-centered bastard. He doesn't live in a vacuum of his own personal pain; he sees the pain of others. Consider the wedding in TOS that became a funeral.
Consider Kirk's comment in TUC about never trusting Klingons, because they killed his son.
Do you really think that Kirk, or anyone else who had lived through the period of Discovery's Klingon War, would have been as restrained as Kirk was in 'Errand of Mercy' after only 9-10 years?
He was part of the fleet at that time. His ship could easily have been one of those that was destroyed. At the very least, he would have lost a lot of friends.
If he had that to say in TUC, he certainly would have had a lot more to say in EOM, coming just 9-10 years after a war of that magnitude.
He was at the academy during the war, not in the fleet.
Dude, you're becoming that type of fan. Wild flights of hyperbolic fancy.
Restrained? He conducted a two-man insurgency against the Klingons!Do you really think that Kirk, or anyone else who had lived through the period of Discovery's Klingon War, would have been as restrained as Kirk was in 'Errand of Mercy' after only 9-10 years?
What's implausible about a war between the Federation and the Klingons?
Obsession said:MCCOY: Am I? I was speaking of Lieutenant James T. Kirk of the starship Farragut. Eleven years ago, you were the young officer at the phaser station when something attacked. According to the tapes, this young Lieutenant Kirk insisted upon blaming himself.
Not sure what you mean here. People never seem to expect the next war. They think there's no way that could happen again and blissfully ignore all the warning signs.I feel it's magnitude versus not acknowledging that magnitude just 9-10 years later.
Kirk graduated in '57.Kirk would be well out of the Academy in 2256/7.
I imagine if I had a son that would effect me more than just losing a comrade in arms. Your own flesh-and-blood is not the same as even a friend. You expect a fellow soldier to die in battle. You don't expect your own kid to. And technically a civilian at that. It's inherently different.
I never served but I have several friends who were in Iraq and Afghanistan. One had his face completely scarred (meaning everywhere on his face is scar tissue) and another has severe PTSD episodes. Others, they're not as bad off or bad off at all. The experiences and circumstances vary upon the missions and how close in combat they were. Not to mention how much combat they saw.
Yes, I'm injecting some Real Life into this debate.
Restrained? He conducted a two-man insurgency against the Klingons!
Kirk graduated in '57.
Court Martial said:STONE: Let us begin with your relationship with Commander Finney. You knew him for a long time, didn't you?
KIRK: Yes. He was an instructor at the Academy when I was a midshipman, but that didn't stand in the way of our beginning a close friendship. His daughter Jamie, who was here last night, was named after me.
STONE: It's common knowledge that something happened to your friendship.
KIRK: It's no secret. We were assigned to the same ship some years later. I relieved him on watch once and found a circuit open to the atomic matter piles that should've been closed. Another five minutes, it could have blown up the ship.
SHAW: And who was that officer?
ENSIGN: Ensign James T. Kirk.
SHAW: Louder, please, for the court.
ENSIGN: Ensign James T. Kirk.
The show doesn't agree with itself.The shows don't agree with you.
He was a Lieutenant on the Farragut in '57.
Is there a reason he should? Did soldiers in WWII spend a lot of time talking about WWI?But did not reference a recent war of large magnitude!
The show doesn't agree with itself.
Sometimes people are a lot closer to friends than they are to blood relatives, especially if those blood relatives were highly judgmental, holier-than-thou, treated them like shit, and their friends didn't do that.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.