Spidey OUT of MCU

[Professor Zoom]

Nope.

It doesn't count if it's not Cumberbatch.

 

[Booji]

It doesn't count if it's not Cumberbatch.

Nope!

 

[Professor Zoom]

Nope!

I'm sorry. It's the rules.

 

[JD]

Nope!

 

[Anwar]

The Raimi films were not a part of shared universe and scored as close to perfect as anyone could get with a Spider-Man adaptation

Yeah. No.

I would argue the opposite. The MCU ones are garbage. The Raimi ones as well as Into the Spider-verse, which are not connected with the MCU are all vastly superior.

Into the Spider-Verse was everything MCU Haters complained the MCU was. But because it had no one but Spidey characters in it somehow that automatically made it good. Hypocrites.

 

[suarezguy]

I have to agree that Spider-Verse was pretty MCU-ish so it's hard to see why someone would like one and not the other.

 

[Mudd]

I have to agree that Spider-Verse was pretty MCU-ish so it's hard to see why someone would like one and not the other.

No, because the script was very clever. Not a hallmark of the MCU.

 

[Mudd]

That's because there hasn't been a great Spidey film pre MCU. All the live action Spidey films were garbage at best.

 

[The Nth Doctor]

No, because the script was very clever. Not a hallmark of the MCU.

Hahahaha....nope.

 

[Anwar]

No, because the script was very banal and predictable. Not a hallmark of the MCU.

Fixed.

 

[Anwar]

Hahahaha....nope.

 

[Turtletrekker]

Bwahahahahahaha!! That's beautiful!

You win the internet for the day.

 

[Timelord79 (he/him)]

The biggest draw (pun not intended) for ItSV, was it’s unique and beautiful animation style which enhanced the story quite a bit.

 

[Kai "the spy"]

This is beginning to feel like a DC movies vs Marvel movies thread.

 

[Ovation]

This is beginning to feel like a DC movies vs Marvel movies thread.

Beginning?

 

[Professor Zoom]

*Checks out which super hero movie has one an Oscar, and not for technical/design*

Huh.

 

[Mudd]

The biggest draw (pun not intended) for ItSV, was it’s unique and beautiful animation style which enhanced the story quite a bit.

That was a great part of it as well, yes. It captured the kinetic art of comics and layered on graphic elements in such a way that I found it a far truer and more satisfying evocation of the characters and their milieu than I ever do these live-action blockbusters.

 

[CorporalClegg]

It's the best comic movie since Batman 89 and not just because of the artwork.

 

[TREK_GOD_1]

Everything you just said is objectively wrong.

True.

I would argue the opposite. The MCU ones are garbage. The Raimi ones as well as Into the Spider-verse, which are not connected with the MCU are all vastly superior.

..and all represent the source in ways the MCU could not touch, instead, making Parker "Spider-Lad, The Boy Wonder" to Iron Man--a begging side-kick wannabe with some surrogate daddy issues on the side, but never did we get a sense of the individual Peter Parker and how this kid dealt with operating in the adult world that was not overloaded with fanciful creatures and energy blasts .

 

[CorporalClegg]

The whole second film was about that. Punctuated by how the fanciful creatures and energy blasts were literally an illusion without substance.