The question of whether it's a reboot is neither here nor there. What matters is the intrinsic quality of the movie itself.
Yes, they are entertaining.
Fat chicks?
What on Earth are you on about?
He was obviously answering the question asked in the poll. It has nothing to do with your sexist remark about "Fat Chicks".
I have repeatedly asked you stop with the spammy, argumentative, off-topic posts. This time you've earned an infraction. Comments to PM.
I like big butts [a play on the word 'reboots'?] and I can not lie
You other brothers can't deny
What you should have done was post the poll here without any reference at all to the poll in the other forum and you would have gotten "non-skewed" results...but since you let the cat out of the bag, the results here will also be "somewhat" skewed.
Nope. Thought they were very disposable like the Transformers movies.
Maybe they weren't great but they didn't give me a formulaic Hollywood vibe.Or Star Treks 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10.
Yes, they are entertaining.
Fat chicks?
Personally I think that the reboots are better than the alternative, IE nothing.
Nope.
The only thing I can honestly say I like 100% was the casting of Karl Urban--shame they do nothing with him.
Personally I think that the reboots are better than the alternative, IE nothing.
I like Star Trek (2009).
I love Star Trek Into Darkness (2013).
So, yes.
Basically how I feel as well. Eric Bana's Nero being a mostly uninteresting villain is the biggest problem I have with the first one, which I felt Khan and Admiral Marcus did a good job of rectifying for the sequel.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.