bring Janeway bak she was fantastic and made star trek voyager what it was. i wish i could be like her all the time. pls pls bring bak kathryn janeway and voyager
^Voyager hasn't gone anyhwhere.
Actually, Star Trek means something to me at least since elementary school. To give you a hint of how long ago that was, TOS and I were "born" in the same year.
It would be easy to fit Admiral Janeway in to the current story arc of Voyager being redeployed to the Delta Quadrant. Since Admiral Willem Batiste who was overseeing this mission now is no longer with Voyager due to him being exposed as a alien from the race Species 8472 this leaves Voyager in need of a new Admiral to oversee this mission. There is no Admiral more qualified that Admiral Kathryn Janeway to oversee this mission since she is the only Admiral in all of Starfleet who has actually had any experience in the Delta Quadrant. I am sure that Kristen Beyer who is a very capable writer would be able to creatively come of with a way to resurrect Admiral Janeway from the realm of the Q continuum, and incorporate her into this new story arc.
You are seriously starting to piss me off.
Please, at least tell me straight up what you just keep coyly implying: you think you're a better fan, and a better person, than me, simply because you liked Star Trek first.
You called me a "punk", implied I was being dishonest, disparagingly spoke of how young I was three times, and said you "pity the younger generation who think [this] is [real Star Trek]".
If choosing to be pissed off is my problem, choosing to be patronizing and belittling is yours.
IMHO, the most recent stuff is not Trek and I pity the younger generation who think it is.
So, I'm doing more than just arguing with someone who I don't believe is old enough to have participated in the first letter writing campaign.
Didn't I say that was doing more than arguing with punks?
And for the record, I don't have to believe every claim that comes along, not even yours.
According to the Simon & Schuster guidelines for submission of a Star Trek Novel it states the following:
“No death of an established crewmember or character, or any other permanent change in the Star Trek characters, settings, or universe, such as introducing offspring or close relations of the characters other than those already established”
IMHO, the most recent stuff is not Trek and I pity the younger generation who think it is.
Not belittling?
So, I'm doing more than just arguing with someone who I don't believe is old enough to have participated in the first letter writing campaign.
Not patronizing?
Didn't I say that was doing more than arguing with punks?
I was the only person you were arguing with at the time.
And for the record, I don't have to believe every claim that comes along, not even yours.
Either you believe me - and believe I'm honest - or don't - and are therefore accusing me of dishonesty.
Your words.
According to the Simon & Schuster guidelines for submission of a Star Trek Novel it states the following:
“No death of an established crewmember or character, or any other permanent change in the Star Trek characters, settings, or universe, such as introducing offspring or close relations of the characters other than those already established”
It seems to me that since these are Simon & Schuster's guidelines they should make a better effort of sticking to them.
Again, you said you were old enough. Be that as it may, you do take things personally and none of it has been directed personally at you.
It was my first poll. I don't think it's really fair to make the poll public after those who voted believed it to be anonymous (just on principle)
I never expected organized spamming by Super Janeway Fans, many of which don't read the books at all. Less still did I expect some people believing my little poll was somehow a Pocket Books plot. Lesson learned for the next time.
It's been interesting.
Steve, I'm curious. If you had to go to the calendar, when would you mark the point where Trek peaked? Recently, I've been thinking that the release of Generations was either the zenith of Trek's arc or the point where the engine cut out (where there was still some upward momentum, but not much), but that by the time the 30th-anniversary rolled around, Trek was in decline.
A few years ago, I was in a relationship with a feminist, she was a bit of a sci fi fan, same as me but she had never watched any Trek, because of her world view, she borrowed my Voyager DVDs and we watched them either together or she did on her own. She hated Janeway, she was inconsistently written and did not see her as a role model for anyone. I guess there are people out there as this thread like all the others demonstrate who believe she is the second coming or similar.
Actually, Star Trek means something to me at least since elementary school. To give you a hint of how long ago that was, TOS and I were "born" in the same year.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.