• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Should there be a Captain Pike spin-off from DSC?

Should there be a Captain Pike spin-off from DSC?

  • Yes

    Votes: 110 71.0%
  • No

    Votes: 18 11.6%
  • Don't know, let's wait until DSC season 2 is finished

    Votes: 27 17.4%

  • Total voters
    155
A lead character need not be likable. The fact that they haven't gone an easy route with Burnham has grown on me over time.
I'll agree with Tuskin on that. There's been a few enterprise shows. Let's see where this ship Discovery goes for awhile longer.
Precisely so. There is this insistence that leads be likable and that isn't always appropriate for the story being told.

Thus far, I think that Burnham's story is far more interesting than is given credit for, because of reckless labeling.
I was under the impression it's a character who is always right and revered by everyone. Even after she mutinneed that's Burnham.
That is inaccurate on both counts.
 
I was under the impression it's a character who is always right and revered by everyone. Even after she mutinneed that's Burnham.
but Burnham isn't always right, that's the whole plot of season 1 goddammit!
Also: if she weren't female, would she still be a know-it-all? I'm just wondering, because I seldomly hear or read that description, when it comes to male characters.
 
There's nothing even interesting about her. She's a smug know it all Mary Sue. Along with her unlikeability I really can't stand her.
I'll admit up front I dislike the term Mary Sue, I think it is overused, and generally wrongfully used, as it is in this context. She's not THAT. Opinions are legion, but yours is wrong, regarding this.

As she's to some degree the lens around which the action occurs, she doesn't have to have extremes of character to draw the viewer in or make them fall in love or want to have their babies or have a love-hate thing or all the other stuff that can be said about popular characters. They have other characters for that.

Burnham is a flawed character that happens to be extremely good at many things, much of that from what is being revealed as an extremely competitive upbringing as an orphan on an alien world. The Federation has billions of citizens. If Starfleet is a desirable location for some of their most qualified people, then they'd HAVE to be very good at things.
 
I was under the impression it's a character who is always right and revered by everyone. Even after she mutinneed that's Burnham.
She's not always right (You mention her betrayal of Georgiou yourself. Or her killing T'Kuvma against orders), she's not revered by everyone (Did you miss the whole exchange with Connolly that everyone has been freaking out about? Or how long it took the crew to regain their trust in her?), and that's not all that constitutes a Mary Sue character.
 
but Burnham isn't always right, that's the whole plot of season 1 goddammit!
Also: if she weren't female, would she still be a know-it-all? I'm just wondering, because I seldomly hear or read that description, when it comes to male characters.

Who else in Trek was a know it all? Data? Spock? Seven of Nine? Q? They pretty much did know it all.
 
She's not always right (You mention her betrayal of Georgiou yourself. Or her killing T'Kuvma against orders), she's not revered by everyone (Did you miss the whole exchange with Connolly that everyone has been freaking out about? Or how long it took the crew to regain their trust in her?), and that's not all that constitutes a Mary Sue character.

Who is Connolly?

Assaulting Georgiou and killing T'Kuvma were eventually shown to be medal worthy.
 
Wesley was more of a Mary Sue than Burnham. Apparently he was even an author insert of Gene so he fits the term even better than she does.

I agree but this is not about Wesley, who at least got humbled in the end. Its about Burnham.
 
Precisely so. There is this insistence that leads be likable and that isn't always appropriate for the story being told.

Thus far, I think that Burnham's story is far more interesting than is given credit for, because of reckless labeling.

That is inaccurate on both counts.

Mary Sue
noun
  1. (originally in fan fiction) a type of female character who is depicted as unrealistically lacking in flaws or weaknesses.
    "she was not a ‘strong woman’ so much as an insufferable Mary Sue"
 
Mary Sue
noun
  1. (originally in fan fiction) a type of female character who is depicted as unrealistically lacking in flaws or weaknesses.
    "she was not a ‘strong woman’ so much as an insufferable Mary Sue"
And Burnham has flaws and weaknesses, so she isn’t a Mary Sue.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top